MPCA challenges
judge's ruling on sulfate limit
Wild rice harvested on Perch Lake on the Fond du Lac Reservation
gleams in the sunlight. (News Tribune file photo)
The Minnesota Pollution Control
Agency on Wednesday said it has filed a response defending its proposed wild
rice sulfate standard that in January was panned by a state administrative law
judge.PCA officials say their proposed sulfate pollution standard is a good
compromise that protects wild rice in places where sulfate pollution might
damage it, but also allows more sulfate pollution in lakes and rivers where it
may not harm the plant.
The new, lake-by-lake standard
would replace a long-standing but mostly unenforced statewide sulfate limit for
wild rice waters that industry officials say is too restrictive and could
cripple the state's taconite iron ore industry, as well as cost millions of
dollars for municipal sewage plants to comply with.
Scientists say excess sulfate in
some waters can spur the development of sulfides, which can starve wild rice of
needed nutrients, damaging or even killing the plants.The PCA response this
week, filed with the state's chief administrative law judge, addresses concerns
raised in the January decision by Judge LauraSue Schlatter, who said the PCA's
proposed new sulfate rule failed to meet the definition of a state rule and
failed to meet the federal Clean Water Act. Schlatter also said the PCA also didn't
properly consider concerns raised by tribal groups.
Schlatter ruled against repealing
the existing, statewide 10 parts-per-million limit due to the PCA's
"failure to establish the reasonableness of the repeal, and because the
repeal conflicts" with the federal Clean Water Act.The judge said the PCA
plan to develop "equation-based" limits for specific lakes and rivers
that hold wild rice "fails to meet the definition of a rule" under
state law "and is unconstitutionally void for vagueness."
Schlatter even rejected the PCA's
preliminary list of 1,300 lakes and rivers where the agency believes viable
wild rice stands exist, places where the new rules would have applied, because
the list itself violated federal law.
PCA officials on Wednesday said
the judge simply erred in applying the Clean Water Act, noting that using
equations to determine limits is a common practice in rulemaking for pollution
standards."We think the law judge misread the Clean Water Act," said
John Linc Stine, PCA commissioner, in a conference call with reporters.PCA
officials say their response addresses most of the concerns raised by Schlatter
in her January decision, and they are hopeful the chief administrative law
judge will reconsider the decision and support the new sulfate rule with the
changes made.
A decision is expected in the coming weeks.But even if the chief
judge reverses the January decision, the future of the proposed sulfate rule is
in question. Several state lawmakers, pushed by the state's mining industry,
are advancing legislation that would prohibit the PCA from enforcing the new or
old sulfate pollution limits, saying their impact on industry, jobs and
commerce would be devastating. One bill also calls for a wild rice task force
that would address multiple issues that threaten wild rice, not just sulfate
pollution.
Meanwhile, tribal and
environmental interests have panned the PCA's effort as too lax on industry,
saying there's no scientific basis for a lake-by-lake standard that would be
confusing, hard to enforce and not as protective as the existing statewide
standard for wild rice. They are calling for enforcement of the existing
statewide sulfate limit.
Tribal entities could ask the
federal Environmental Protection Agency to step in and decide the issue if they
believe it's not protective of tribal pollution limits where they have
regulatory authority, such as where rivers flow through reservations.Scientists
have found that sulfate — which can come from sewage effluent, mine discharges
and other industrial processes — is converted to sulfides in the sediment of
many wild rice lakes and rivers. The rate of that conversion changes depending
on the amount of carbon and iron in the water (generally, more sulfides with
high carbon, fewer sulfides with high iron). It's those sulfides that prevent
wild rice from thriving in some areas; the proposed new rule would study the
water chemistry of each wild rice lake and river to determine what sulfate
pollution level they could handle and still grow wild rice.The PCA says about
135 facilities are within 25 miles upstream of wild rice waters and would be
the most likely ones affected by any sulfate rule enforcement.
https://www.duluthnewstribune.com/news/science-and-nature/4424101-mpca-challenges-judges-ruling-sulfate-limit
Rice Radio
By Kurt Richter
To listen to an audio podcast, mouse over the title and click
Play. Open iTunes to download and subscribe to podcasts.
|
|
Name
|
Description
|
Released
|
Price
|
|
|
1
|
Episode 8: Preparing For Planting, Chinese GMO & The Road
To New Storage
|
It's March in the Sacramento Valley, which means farmers are
chomping at
the bit to start working ground. In this episode of Rice
Radio, we check in at
the shop as the countdown to planting season draws to a close.
We also debunk a meme...
|
3/27/2018
|
Free
|
|
|
2
|
Episode 7: Sites Reservoir, Snowpack & The Farm Show
|
The ongoing saga of Sites Reservoir and Proposition 1 made
news
this month, but not for good reasons. In this episode, I
sat down with
Jim Watson, General
Manager for Sites Project Authority, to break down
the hysteria around
Sites. Rice...
|
2/15/2018
|
Free
|
|
|
3
|
Saving Salmon in the Sacramento Valley
|
Sacramento River salmon runs have been on the decline for
years,
with almost no glimmers
of hope or upticks in fish counts for more
than a decade.
Several years ago, the farmer and water agencies who
pump off the river
decided to take matters...
|
1/24/2018
|
Free
|
|
|
4
|
The USA Rice Outlook Conference: Growing Rice, Selling Rice,
and Telling That Story.
|
The USA Rice Federation held its annual Outlook Conference in
early December. It's a change for people from all avenues of the
industry to get the latest on what's going on with rice in the United States
and globally. What's happening in...
|
12/27/2017
|
Free
|
|
|
5
|
Episode 4: The Oroville Dam: Past, Present, and Future
|
In February of 2017, the residents of Oroville, California,
along with other
downstream communities
of the Feather River, had their lives turned
upside down by the threat of flooding from failed structures
at the
Oroville Dam site. It was a...
|
11/28/2017
|
Free
|
|
|
6
|
Episode 3: Harvest ’17, Waterfowl & Water Storage Outlook
|
Lodged rice, equipment breakdowns, parts shortages,
crazy geese!
In this episode of Rice Radio, we recap a California Rice
Harvest that has
been called one of the
most difficult of the last 40 years. I also talk to
Fish and Wildlife about...
|
10/27/2017
|
Free
|
|
|
7
|
Episode 2: Harvest, Shorebirds, and Roxy
|
It's autumn in California, which means rice harvest is in full
swing. In this episode of Rice Radio, we check in at harvest and see how
things are coming along. I'll also introduce you to a new development in
California Rice, which could change how...
|
9/26/2017
|
Free
|
|
|
8
|
Episode 1: Welcome to Rice Radio!
|
The premiere episode of the new podcast, Rice Radio.
Topics covered include a recap of the 2017 rice season,
including wild
weather and flooding.
Also covered, army worms, weedy red rice, and the
Chinese market finally opening up to U.S. Rice.
|
8/25/2017
|
Free
|
|
|
8
Items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description
Rice Radio is an inside look at
all things related to the California Rice Industry and the Sacramento Valley.
Produced and Hosted by California Rice Grower, Kurt Richter, Rice Radio covers
the crop, the market, water, water and property rights, conservation,
regulations, and much more.
https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/rice-radio/id1298082371?mt=2#episodeGuid=3af24518ef4f69e7eae78d72db24ee2a
PARC
scientists develop new machine for wheat sowing
Islamabad
Handling of the combine harvested
paddy residue has been becoming a great concern to the farmers in rice-wheat
cropping system. The residue is either removed or spread in the field manually.
In general, farmers prefer to burn it as an easy and cost-effective method of
disposal. However, burning of residue not only results in loss of precious crop
nutrients but also poses a great threat to the environment, human health and
economy. The smog restricts road and air traffic and causes respiratory
problems for human/ animal health. Agricultural Engineering Institute organized
a Farmer’s Field Day to show wheat crop performance sown with PAK Seeder in
heavy rice residue at Ch. Shahbaz, Khokhar farm near Siakhum, on
Muridkay-Sheihkhupura Road. Dr Yusuf Zafar (T.I) Chairman Pakistan Agricultural
Research Council (PARC), Islamabad was the Chief Guest at the occasion. Dr
Nadeem Amjad Member Coordination/DG Agricultural Engineering Division (AED), Dr
Anjum Ali Buttar Member Crop Sciences division, Dr Abdul Majeed, country
representative of ICARDA country head and other dignitaries from Government of
Punjab participated in the event. On arrival of Chairman and other guests a
pictorial presentation was given by Engr. Shabbir Ahmed Kalwar Project Incharge
of ICARDA-USDA funded project about PARC efforts and different approaches since
last 12 years to reach PAK Seeder.
Thu Mar 29 2018 15:07:33 GMT+0500 (Pakistan Standard
Time)
UN data show
nearly half of Kingdom’s rice exports undocumented
An employee points out a stack of rice for an order at a rice
warehouse in Phnom Penh. Eli Meixler
The UN Food and Agriculture
Organisation (FAO) is forecasting that 44 percent of Cambodia’s total rice
exports will be smuggled out of the country through informal channels this
year, a persistent problem that weighs down profits and threatens to cripple
the industry.
The FAO’s forecast, released
earlier this month, predicted that Cambodia’s rice exports in 2018 would reach
1.35 million tonnes, a 5 percent increase over last year. But only 750,000
tonnes of that would be formal exports, according to Shirley Mustafa, an
economist at the FAO.
The other 600,000 tonnes would be
“unrecorded cross-border deliveries” – rice that is bought directly from
farmers by so-called brokers and then smuggled into neighbouring countries,
usually Vietnam or Thailand.
Smuggling has long plagued Cambodia’s rice
sector. While the Kingdom recorded 635,700 tonnes of exports last
year, Mustafa said the FAO estimated an additional 650,000 tonnes went
unrecorded.
But any government crackdown on
the illegal rice trade would cripple the country’s rice farmers, said Hean
Vanhan, director-general at the General Directorate of Agriculture, which is
under the Agriculture Ministry.
“During harvesting season, the
capacity of rice millers cannot handle all the rice from farmers, so our rice
and paddy rice must be sold to brokers along the border,” he said, blaming the
problem on limited financing and storage for the paddy rice.
The government has taken steps to
improve the country’s storage capacity in the past year, distributing $30
million in loans to construct three new storage and processing facilities. But
the total storage capacity at those three facilities is just 300,000 tonnes of
rice, far below the required space to meet the government’s target of 1 million
tonnes of officially exported rice.
“In order to reach 1 million
tonnes of rice exports, we need to store approximately 2 million tonnes of
paddy rice,” said Hun Lak, vice president of the Cambodian Rice Federation
(CRF), the sector’s industry body. That would be a more than sixfold increase
over current storage capacity.
Ngeth Chou, a senior consultant
at Emerging Markets Consulting, said the government should begin cracking down
on the unofficial border checkpoints to stem the flow of smuggled rice.
A farmer harvests his rice crop at a paddy in Phnom Penh’s Russey
Keo district in 2015. Vireak Mai
“Cambodia will lose a lot of
profits and revenue from [rice] exports,” he said, adding Cambodian rice’s
international reputation was also being harmed.Despite widespread smuggling, it
hasn’t been all bad news for the rice sector. China agreed to increase its
Cambodian rice import quota to 300,000 tonnes this year, up from 200,000 tonnes
last year and 100,000 tonnes the year before. And Mustafa from the FAO noted
that the 2017-18 rice harvest season had unfolded positively so far, which
should ensure adequate supply for export.
But the smuggling issue is
compounded with internal struggles within the CRF, which is headed by Sok
Puthyvuth, the son-in-law of Prime Minister Hun Sen. Puthyvuth was narrowly
re-elected as CRF president in 2016 with 113 out of 215 votes.The CRF released
a scathing assessment of its own capabilities in a report in January this year,
noting “there are many challenges facing the CRF”, including board members with
“commitment discipline issues” who only show up “when the meeting is about
their interests”.
It also notes that farmers often
suffer in favour of millers and traders, complaints from members often go
unaddressed, decisions by board members often go unimplemented and the entire
operation is hampered by a lack of financing.When it came to the topic of
smuggling, the CRF report said that porous borders posed an existential threat
to the entire rice industry.
Over 40 percent of Cambodia’s
rice exports went to the EU last year, which has stringent requirements to
verify the origin of the rice. But the porous border means Vietnamese rice
could be brought into Cambodia, labelled as Cambodian rice and then exported,
which would be a violation of trade rules. That would jeopardise Cambodia’s
preferential access to the EU market, the report says.In a separate case, Italy
and six other EU countries filed a complaint with the European Commission in
December regarding Cambodian rice. The countries urged the commission to invoke
a so-called “safeguard clause” to limit the import of Cambodian rice, which the
complaint claims is causing a trade imbalance. The commission has not yet
publicly responded to the complaint.Te Taing Por, who ran against Puthyvuth in
the 2016 CRF election, said yesterday he agreed smuggling was a big issue for
the sector and called for the government to curb unrecorded trade.
“The government should know their
duty to stop the unofficial exports,” he said. “They should work more
transparently in order to reach 1 million tonnes of rice exports.”
Contact author: Cheng Sokhor
JC conducts training camp on paddy procurement
THE HANS INDIA | Mar 29,2018 , 12:28 AM IST
JC conducts training camp on paddy procurement
Siddipet: Siddipet Joint
Collector Padmakar conducted training classes for Indira Kranthi Pathakam (IKP)
groups and Primary Agricultural Credit Society (PACS) - a basic unit and
smallest co-operative credit institutions working on gram panchayat and village
level, at Rice Millers Associations building in Siddipet on Wednesday for the
procurement and Minimum Support Price( MSP) for paddy crop for Rabi season for
the year 2017-18.
The Joint Collector issued guidelines to the management of
procurement centres such as the MSP Rs 1590 for Grade-A and Rs 1550 for common
type paddy crop with the target of 2,00,000 metric tons at total 154
procurement centres of 103 IKP centres and 54 PACS with the usage of gunny bags
in the ratio of 54:46.
All centres should have proper infrastructure with paddy cleaner,
Tarpaulins and weighing scales and moisture meter including drinking water,
toilets and shelter facilities failing which the centres will not be permitted
for the business. Centres should maintain daily records on the basis of entry
day in the tab making sure that no double payments are made. The district level
agricultural and revenue officials participated in the meeting
Murphy: GMO — OMG!
March 28, 2018 01:00 PM
Print
Genetically modified organisms have been given a bad rap. It is
too late to change their image? ( Farm Journal )
Without much of a coordinated
marketing plan, without a whole lot of media fanfare and without much
resistance from industry, the demonization of genetically engineered food
ingredients appears to be nearly compete.
In fact, “Non-GMO” has acquired
all the cachet of “organic” as a marker of (alleged) quality and purity. That
is amazing, for two reasons.
First, the organic industry and
its mouthpiece organizations, such as the Organic Trade Association, have
labored tirelessly for decades to convince consumers that anything not labeled
organic is guilty until proven innocent: guilty of being contaminated with a
roster of chemicals, pesticides, and God knows what other lethal residues with
which evil farmers have tainted the produce and grains they grow and market to
us witless dupes.
At least there is some evidence
that toxic pesticides, if applied improperly on a farm, could result in the
presence of residues on foods that would trigger health problems.
Likewise, it’s understandable
that consumer activists can attack Big Meat, because food-safety issues, such
as microbial contamination, have been documented to cause illnesses and deaths.
Obviously, those outcomes can easily be leveraged to promote anti-industry
messaging.
GMOs have no such track record.
Second, opposition to GMOs is
unique in that, unlike the Meatless Mondays movement, avoidance of genetically
modified food ingredients isn’t being promoted as an eco-positive initiative,
the way that cutting back on beef is positioned as a way to save the planet,
environmentally speaking.
The reality is that nobody has
gotten sick or died from eating the millions of tons of food products made with
GM corn and soy. Of all the issues one would reasonably expect to see leveraged
on the basis of factual evidence, GMOs ought to be at the top of that short
list.
A Nobel Protest Falls Flat
For example: Back in 2016, more than 100 Nobel laureates — the most
accomplished scientists on Earth — signed a letter urging Greenpeace, the early
leader and eventually chief cheerleader of the “Frankenfoods” movement, to end
its opposition to GMOs. Greenpeace had not been heavily involved with
agricultural or nutritional issues previously; GMOs were a gift-wrapped cause
that landed in their laps, thanks to the public’s ignorance of biotechnology.
Specifically, the Nobel
scientists singled out genetically engineered “golden rice,” which could reduce
Vitamin A deficiencies that can cause blindness and death among some 250
million children in the developing world subsisting on vitamin-deficient diets.
“We urge Greenpeace and its
supporters to re-examine the experience of farmers and consumers worldwide with
crops and foods improved through biotechnology,” the scientists stated at the
time, “and abandon their campaign against GMOs in general and Golden Rice in
particular.
“Scientific and regulatory
agencies around the world have repeatedly and consistently found crops and
foods improved through biotechnology to be as safe as, if not safer than, those
derived from any other method of production. There has never been a single
confirmed case of a negative health outcome for humans or animals from their
consumption. Their environmental impacts have been shown repeatedly to be less
damaging to the environment, and a boon to global biodiversity.”
In the face of such a clear-cut
rationale, the question becomes: Why the backlash?
Partly because GMOs are tangled
up in the backdrop of corporate control (think Monsanto), which is a red flag
for many people and provides anti-GM activists with a ready-made villain to
demonize.
But the truth is that “the
industry,” broadly defined, did it to themselves. The anti-GMO campaigns would
never have gotten the traction they’ve enjoyed if the application of this
understandably intimidating new biotechnology hadn’t been deployed almost
exclusively to benefit agricultural interests, rather than consumers.
GMOs wouldn’t have become a
hot-button issue if the research hadn’t been focused almost exclusively at
first on developing “square tomatoes and steel-skinned strawberries” (my
words), improvements aimed at benefitting growers and processors, not the
people eating those foods.
Golden rice and other
consumer-friendly GM projects came along way too late to alter the damage done
by the narrative that genetic engineering is the scourge of the modern world.
And by “damage,” I mean listening to college instructors who hold PhDs (in
subjects other than the life sciences, of course) tell me point blank, “GMOs
are terrible. I would never buy foods that contain them!”
As if “GMO” referred to some
physical contaminant, like E. coli or antibiotic residues.
As one activist admitted to me in
an email exchange, “We don’t need people to understand GMOs; we just need them
to understand that they’re bad.”
“GMO-OMG!” is definitely the
operative phrase — just not in the sense that activists use it.
Editor’s Note: The opinions in his commentary are those of Dan Murphy, a
veteran journalist and commentator.
March
29, 2018 / LAST MODIFIED: 12:00 AM, March 29, 2018
What protections for haor crops?
Shykh
Seraj at a green paddy field in a haor area of Mohanganj. Photo: Hridoye Mati O
Manush
At the moment, there is green
vibrancy in rice fields of haor region. Lands after lands across the wide area,
rice fields have turned picturesquely green. The only crop of the year, Boro
rice is being grown. After one and a half months, the fields will turn golden
with ripened rice and the crop will be ready for harvesting. The green colour
of paddy this season tells the tale of yet another great production for the
nation. However, farmers dreaming of getting this golden crop have doubts on
whether they will be able to take it home. Will it submerge again due to a
flash flood?
Ali Nur, farmer from Khaliajuri,
Netrakona says that his two and a half acres of paddy land went under
floodwater last year. He couldn't harvest anything from his golden fields. This
is the situation of every haor farmer. Back in 2016, farmers couldn't take
their entire crops home. Thousands of hectares of ripe crops submerged. Farmers
of Khaliajuri, Shalla, Shamarchar, Mithamoin, Itna, Tahirpur and many other
haor areas had to face Nayanbhaga. Even though the word Nayanbhaga sounds nice,
only the haor people know how much pain and nature's cruelty are dealt with it.
Talking to haor area people, I learned that two kinds of field workers work in
the two seasons of paddy planting and harvesting. The ones who work during
paddy planting are called Jirati. On the other hand, the ones who do the
harvest works, are called Dawali or Bhagali. These field workers are available
during the planting and harvesting seasons. When the crops go under water due
to untimely floods, these people along with farmers try to save yields as much
as possible. They dive in the water to cut paddies. This whole process is
called Nayanbhaga.
This flash flood is not a new
problem for the haor people. Every year, farmers have a fear that their crops
will submerge. Farmers of this area cultivate BRRI 28 or 29. Their lifetime is
140 days and 160 days respectively. Farmers are keen to cultivate BRRI 29 more
than the others as it gives more yield. However, it takes half of the month of
May for BRRI 29 to be harvested and taken home.
Recently, Director General of
International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) Matthew Morell visited Bangladesh
and we met for a discussion. I raised the issue of submergence-tolerant rice
variety. He said IRRI is experimenting on bringing in a rice variety for haor
areas. If everything goes alright, within one or two years, they will be
successful in introducing a short-term and high yielding paddy variety. IRRI
researcher Dr Md Rafiqul Islam says in many plots of Sunamganj, Kishoreganj and
Habiganj, research for a new variety is going on but they couldn't still get an
appropriate variety. IRRI, BRRI and many varieties from Nepal are being
crossed. If it becomes successful, then they will be able to get a short-term
and high-yielding variety with 2-3 years, said Dr Islam.
There was a time when Aus used to
be the most popular paddy. The word Aus came from Ashu, which means quick or
within a short time. Aus became so popular because of its short-term production
feature. I heard that we even had varieties that could be reaped in 60 days.
However, those varieties were not high-yielding.
My experience tells that farmers
need a variety which is both short-term as well as high-yielding. It is only a
matter of time now to make one for the haor people. Technology and modern
science can join hands to bring this as soon as possible.
It is evident that haor farmers are
becoming victims of climate change. We need to take effective measures to save
the farming in haor areas. I wanted to know from Dr Md Rafiqul Islam what more
is there to do for the haor farmers. He said that until a new variety is
brought in, farmers will need to carry on cultivating BRRI 29 on higher grounds
and BRRI 28 on low lands. Researchers need to conduct multidimensional
research.
There is another question of adding
any alternatives. I talked to globally renowned geneticist Abed Chowdhury. He
talked about aquatic paddy which grows with the increase of water and it can be
cultivated in waterlogged regions. In China, there is such a variety called
Zizania. He also talked about green blue agriculture. Many countries cultivate
'sea-weed' in seaside areas. Besides, water chestnut, wasabi, many kinds of
herbs: sage, parsi and different kinds of hydrophytes are also possible to
cultivate in haor areas.
An alarming scene is that the
construction works of the embankments to protect the haor area is not completed
yet. The ones which are being completed in a hurry are more worrying for
farmers. Haor people doubt if these embankments of soft soil can actually stop
the wild water. Tahirpur's Boyalmara embankment was supposed to be finished by
February. Sadly, the construction work started in March. The contractor, Water
Development Board, administration -- all blamed each other. Farmers complain
that every year construction works for embankments start right before the water
comes. In Sunamganj, Tk 122 crore was allocated for 964 projects to make a
total of 1,400 km embankments. However, the project wasn't completed in time.
The picture remains the same in other haor areas too. After visiting different
haor areas, I felt like their farming method is moving far behind technology.
They don't use any technology to plant or harvest crops even though they use
tractors for ploughing. They could use drum seeder to get planting done in a
short time. Similarly, they could use reaper machines to harvest more crops in
a little time. Thus technology can curb the loss.
Dear readers, for the protection of
farmers' crops and the living of farmers, not only in haor areas but all over
Bangladesh, the government should think seriously about crop insurance. There
will be more investment in agriculture sector if crop insurance is ensured to
provide financial security for the growers. We need to take the haor people
along in the road to sustainable development. Public and private research
institutions and agriculture extension department have to come forward together
not only with a specific plan but with a project with deadline.
Lat the dream that the green crops
of haor is showing turn into gold.
Ready to Eat Rice Market is touching new levels – A comprehensive
study segmented by Key Players: Mars, MTR FOODS, Maiyas, Goldern Star
HTF MI recently broadcasted a new
study in its database that highlights the in-depth market analysis with future
prospects of Ready to Eat Rice market. The study covers significant data which
makes the research document a handy resource for managers, industry executives
and other key people get ready-to-access and self analyzed study along with
graphs and tables to help understand market trends, drivers and market
challenges. Some of the key players mentioned in this research are Mars, Inc,
Gu Long Foods, Gu Da Sao, Shanghai Meilin, VegaFoods, Yamie, Tasty Bite,
Tastic, Jin Luo, Vala Thai Food Co., Ltd., MTR FOODS, Maiyas, Goldern Star
& Kohinoor Foods Ltd.
The research covers the current
market size of the Asia-Pacific Ready to Eat Rice market and its growth rates
based on 5 year history data. It also covers various types of segmentation such
as by geography [China, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, India, Southeast Asia &
Australia], by product /end user type [Indian Style, Chinese Style & Other
Styles], by applications [Convenient Stores, Restaurants and Hotels & Others]
in overall market. The in-depth information by segments of Ready to Eat Rice
market helps monitor performance & make critical decisions for growth and
profitability. It provides information on trends and developments, focuses on
markets and materials, capacities, technologies, CAPEX cycle and the changing
structure of the Asia-Pacific
Ready to Eat Rice Market.
This study also contains company
profiling, product picture and specifications, sales, market share and contact
information of various international, regional, and local vendors of
Asia-Pacific Ready to Eat
Rice Market, some of them are Mars, Inc, Gu Long Foods, Gu Da Sao, Shanghai
Meilin, VegaFoods, Yamie, Tasty Bite, Tastic, Jin Luo, Vala Thai Food Co.,
Ltd., MTR FOODS, Maiyas, Goldern Star & Kohinoor Foods Ltd.
The market competition is constantly growing higher with the rise in
technological innovation and M&A activities in the industry. Moreover, many
local and regional vendors are offering specific application products for varied
end-users. The new vendor entrants in the market are finding it hard to compete
with the international vendors based on quality, reliability, and innovations
in technology.
Asia-Pacific Ready to Eat Rice (Thousands Units) and Revenue
(Million USD) Market Split by Product Type such as Indian Style, Chinese Style
& Other Styles
|
Market
Segment by Type
|
2016
|
2017
|
2018
|
2019
|
2020
|
2021
|
2022
|
|
Indian Style
|
xx
|
xx
|
xx
|
xx
|
xx
|
Xx
|
xx
|
|
-Change (%)
|
xx%
|
xx%
|
xx%
|
xx%
|
xx%
|
xx%
|
xx%
|
|
Chinese Style
|
xx
|
xx
|
xx
|
xx
|
xx
|
Xx
|
xx
|
|
-Change (%)
|
xx%
|
xx%
|
xx%
|
xx%
|
xx%
|
xx%
|
xx%
|
|
Other Styles
|
xx
|
xx
|
xx
|
xx
|
xx
|
Xx
|
xx
|
|
-Change (%)
|
xx%
|
xx%
|
xx%
|
xx%
|
xx%
|
xx%
|
xx%
|
The research study is segmented
by Application such as Convenient Stores, Restaurants and Hotels & Others
with historical and projected market share and compounded annual growth rate.
Asia-Pacific Ready to Eat Rice (Thousands
Units) by Application (2017-2022)
|
Market
Segment by Application
|
2012
|
2017
|
2022
|
Market
Share (%)2022
|
CAGR
(%)
(2017-2022)
|
|
Convenient Stores
|
xx
|
xx
|
xx
|
xx%
|
xx%
|
|
Restaurants and Hotels
|
xx
|
xx
|
xx
|
xx%
|
xx%
|
|
Others
|
xx
|
xx
|
xx
|
xx%
|
xx%
|
|
Total
|
xx
|
xx
|
xx
|
100%
|
xx%
|
Key questions answered in this report – Asia-Pacific Ready to
Eat Rice Market Report 2018
What will the market size be in
2022 and what will the growth rate be
What are the key market trends
What is driving Asia-Pacific Ready to Eat Rice market
What are the challenges to market growth
Who are the key vendors in Asia-Pacific Ready to Eat Rice market space?
What are the key market trends impacting the growth of the Asia-Pacific Ready
to Eat Rice market?
What are the key outcomes of the five forces analysis of the Asia-Pacific Ready
to Eat Rice market?
Get Access to sample pages @ https://www.htfmarketreport.com/sample-report/1046292-asia-pacific-ready-to-eat-rice-market
There are 15 Chapters to display the Asia-Pacific Ready to Eat
Rice market.
Chapter 1, to describe
Definition, Specifications and Classification of Ready to Eat Rice,
Applications of Ready to Eat Rice, Market Segment by Regions;
Chapter 2, to analyze the Manufacturing Cost Structure, Raw Material and
Suppliers, Manufacturing Process, Industry Chain Structure;
Chapter 3, to display the Technical Data and Manufacturing Plants Analysis of
Ready to Eat Rice, Capacity and Commercial Production Date, Manufacturing
Plants Distribution, R&D Status and Technology Source, Raw Materials
Sources Analysis;
Chapter 4, to show the Overall Market Analysis, Capacity Analysis (Company
Segment), Sales Analysis (Company Segment), Sales Price Analysis (Company
Segment);
Chapter 5 and 6, to show the Regional Market Analysis that includes China,
Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, India, Southeast Asia & Australia, Ready to Eat
Rice Segment Market Analysis (by Type);
Chapter 7 and 8, to analyze the Ready to Eat Rice Segment Market Analysis (by
Application) Major Manufacturers Analysis of Ready to Eat Rice;
Chapter 9, Market Trend Analysis, Regional Market Trend, Market Trend by Product
Type [Indian Style, Chinese Style & Other Styles], Market Trend by
Application [Convenient Stores, Restaurants and Hotels & Others];
Chapter 10, Regional Marketing Type Analysis, International Trade Type
Analysis, Supply Chain Analysis;
Chapter 11, to analyze the Consumers Analysis of Ready to Eat Rice;
Chapter 12, to describe Ready to Eat Rice Research Findings and Conclusion,
Appendix, methodology and data source;
Chapter 13, 14 and 15, to describe Ready to Eat Rice sales channel,
distributors, traders, dealers, Research Findings and Conclusion, appendix and
data source.
Thanks for reading this article;
you can also get individual chapter wise section or region wise report version
like North America, Europe or Asia.
About Author:
HTF Market Report is a wholly owned brand of HTF market Intelligence Consulting
Private Limited. HTF Market Report global research and market intelligence
consulting organization is uniquely positioned to not only identify growth
opportunities but to also empower and inspire you to create visionary growth
strategies for futures, enabled by our extraordinary depth and breadth of
thought leadership, research, tools, events and experience that assist you for
making goals into a reality. Our understanding of the interplay between
industry convergence, Mega Trends, technologies and market trends provides our
clients with new business models and expansion opportunities. We are focused on
identifying the “Accurate Forecast” in every industry we cover so our clients
can reap the benefits of being early market entrants and can accomplish their
“Goals & Objectives”.
Red Rice Red Market Analysis and In-depth Research on Market
Trends, Size, Emerging Growth Factors and Forecasts 2023
Red Rice Red research report is made up of an in
depth analysis of current state of the global Red Rice Red market and the
factors that will be responsible for the progression in the future. The Key
word market report also inspects price, revenue, Shipment, gross profit,
interview record, business distribution etc. Additionally, the Red Rice Red
market adds the past data and Provides forecast to 2023
This Red Rice Red market report
also provides the useful information on the basis of capacity, production,
market share, price, revenue, cost, gross, gross margin, growth rate etc. This
is a useful research result which provides detailed competitive analysis of the
market. It also concentrates on the global market along with providing the
development prospects for the industry. The report also includes an analysis of
the manufacturers, suppliers, distributors, traders, within this market.
A further section of the Red Rice
Red report gives an interpretation of revenue, sales, price, cost, and growth
rate of the Red Rice Red market for each region, product types, and applications.
Moreover it covers the imminent scope of the Red Rice Red market.
Top Manufacturers Covered in this report are:
Company1 and Company2 etc..
The report split into several key Regions, with sales
(Units), revenue (Million USD), market share and growth rate of Red Rice Red
for these regions, from 2018 to 2023 (forecast), covering North America Country (United
States, Canada)
South America
Asia Country (China,
Japan, India, Korea)
Europe Country (Germany,
UK, France, Italy)
Other Country (Middle
East, Africa, GCC)
Product classification, of Red Rice Red industry involves- Type1, Type2 and Type3 etc..
Some of the Industry Segmentation mentioned in Red Rice Red
market report- Segmentation1, Segmentation2 and Segmentation3 etc..
Channel (Direct Sales, Distributor) Segmentation
Reasons for Buying this Report:
It helps in making informed
business decisions by having complete detail of market and by making in-depth
analysis of market segments
It provides forecast assessed on
the basis of how the market is predicted to grow
It provides pin point analysis of
changing competition dynamics and keeps you ahead of competitors
Global Red Rice Red Market Forecast 2018-2023
The Red Rice Red industry research report analyses the supply,
sales, production, and market status comprehensively. Production market shares and sales market shares are analysed
along with the study of capacity, production, sales, and revenue. Several other factors such as import, export,
gross margin, price, cost, and consumption are also analysed under the section
Analysis of Red Rice Red production, supply, sales and market status.
Lastly, This report covers the
market landscape and its growth prospects over the coming years, the Report
also brief deals with the product life cycle, comparing it to the relevant
products from across industries that had already been commercialized details
the potential for various applications, discussing about recent product
innovations and gives an overview on potential regional market shares.
Red Rice Red Market Research Growth by
Manufacturers, Regions, Type and Application, Forecast Analysis to 2023
Red Rice Red Market Report
speaks about the manufacturing process.major
Types and
Applications for
the
key
players. Company Competition Regional Market by
Company, Market Demand,Demand (
Situation, Supermarket Others, Comparison, Forecast)
and Sales Revenue, Sales Volume, Price, Cost, Gross Margin all information in
Red Rice Red Market Report.
Description : The global Red Rice Red
market will reach xxx Million USD in 2017 and CAGR xx% 2011-2017. The report
begins from overview of Industry Chain structure, and describes industry
environment, then analyses market size and forecast of Red Rice Red by product,
region and application, in addition, this report introduces market competition
situation among the vendors and company profile, besides, market price analysis
and value chain features are covered in this report.
Ask for sample Report @
Market Segment by
Manufacturers, this report covers: Jiacheng Biotechnology, Shandong Zhonghui,
Jiangr Bio-Technology, Gutian Diyuan, Fuzhou LLX, Hangzhou Twin-Horse, Nanping
Senfa, BNP, Hubei Zixin, Sylvan Bio, Zhejiang Sanhe, Hangzhou Boda, Ningbo HEP,
Gee Lawson, 3W Botanical
Red Rice Red Market Reports List And Figures also
contains Upstream Segment,Application Segment,Major Company List
of With Membrane Type, Sales Revenue, Share 2012-2017,
by Company, in USD Million,Demand in Others, 2012-2017, in USD Million,Regional
Market Size and Growth 2012-2017, by Type, in USD Million
and alson Red Rice Red Market Forecast 2017-2023
Red Rice Red Market Segment by Type,
covers: Industrial
Grade, Food Grade
Red Rice Red Market Segment by Applications,
can be divided into: Health Products, Food Additive
Red Rice Red Market
Segment by Regions, regional analysis covers :
·
North America
·
Europe
·
Asia-Pacific
·
South America
·
Middle East & Africa
Have Any Query? Ask Our Expert
for Red Rice Red Market Report @
Key questions answered in the
report:
·
What will the market growth rate of Red
Rice Red market in 2023?
·
What are the key factors driving the united states Red Rice
Red market?
·
Who are the key manufacturers in Red Rice Red market
space?
·
What are the market opportunities, market risk and market overview of
the Red Rice Red market?
·
What are sales, revenue, and price analysis of
top manufacturers of Red Rice Red market?
·
Who are the distributors, traders and dealers of
Red Rice Red market?
·
What are the Red Rice Red market opportunities
and threats faced by the vendors in the Red Rice Red market?
·
What are sales, revenue, and price analysis by types and applications of
Red Rice Red market?
·
What are sales, revenue, and price analysis by regions of
Red Rice Red market?
No of pages in Red Rice
Red Market Reports :102
Purchase Red Rice
Red Market Report at $ 2980 (SUL) @
The next part also sheds light on the gap between supply and
consumption. Apart from the mentioned information, growth
rate of Red Rice Red market in 2023 is also explained. Additionally,
type wise and application wise consumption tables and figures of
Red Rice Red market are also given.
Hybrid Rice Seeds Sales Market Research
2017-2022; Regional Industry Segment by Production, Consumption, Revenue and
Growth Rate
Hybrid
Rice Seeds Sales Market report provides complete
evaluation for those who are looking for Business expand in various regions,
manufacturers, New entrants in the industry, Professional
organisation/solutions providers, Government bodies, financial speculators and
private value firms.
Reports presents an in-depth
assessment of the Hybrid Rice Seeds Sales including enabling technologies, key
trends, market drivers, challenges, standardization, regulatory landscape,
opportunities, future roadmap, value chain, ecosystem player profiles and
strategies. The report also presents forecasts for Hybrid Rice Seeds Sales
investments from 2017 till 2022.
Top Key Players of Hybrid Rice
Seeds Sales Market: Dupont Pioneer,Syngenta,Bayer
CropScience,Nath,Advanta,Nirmal Seeds,Longping High-tech,China National Seed
Group,Hainan Shennong Gene,WIN-ALL HI-TECH SEED,Hefei Fengle Seed,Zhongnongfa
Seed,RiceTec,SL Agritech.
Global Hybrid Rice Seeds Sales
market is booming into the Agriculture sector at present era. The Hybrid Rice Seeds Sales
has uncovered rapid development in the current and past years and is probably
going to proceed with a continuing development in the upcoming years.
Major classifications are as
follows: 3-line Breeding Systems2-line Breeding Systems .
Major applications are as
follows: Application1, Application2. & more.
Scope of the Report: This report focuses on the
Hybrid Rice Seeds Sales in Global market, especially in Europe,
North America, China, Japan, Southeast Asia. This report
categorizes the market based on manufacturers, regions, type and application.
Key Reasons to Purchase:
·
To gain insightful analyses of the market and
have comprehensive
understanding of the global Hybrid Rice Seeds Sales market
and its commercial landscape.
·
Assess the Hybrid Rice Seeds Sales production processes, major issues, and solutions to
mitigate the development risk.
·
To understand the most affecting driving and restraining forces in
the Hybrid Rice Seeds Sales market and its impact in the global market.
·
Learn about the market strategies that are being adopted by
leading respective organizations.
·
To understand the future outlook and prospects for Hybrid Rice
Seeds Sales market.
Key questions answered in the
report include:
·
What are the key role in Hybrid Rice Seeds Sales
market report?
·
What was the market size in 2011 to 2016?
·
How will market change over the forecast period
and what will be the market size in 2022?
·
Who are the key market players and what are their
strategies in the Hybrid Rice Seeds Sales market?
·
What are the key market trends impacting the
growth of the Global Hybrid Rice Seeds Sales Industry?
·
What are the market opportunities and challenges
faced by the vendors in the Global Hybrid Rice Seeds Sales market?
·
What trends, drivers and barriers are influencing
its growth?
·
What are the key outcomes of the five forces
analysis of the Global Hybrid Rice Seeds Sales market?
At last, the report gives the inside and out examination of
Hybrid Rice Seeds Sales Market took after by above components, which are useful
for organizations or individual for development of their present business or
the individuals who are hoping to enter in Hybrid Rice Seeds Sales industry.
https://businessservices24.com/224659/hybrid-rice-seeds-sales-market-research-2017-2022-regional-industry-segment-by-production-consumption-revenue-and-growth-rate/
