Friday, January 24, 2020

23rd January,2020 Daily Global Regional Local Rice E-Newsletter


23rd  January,2020 Daily

Global Regional and Local Rice E-Newsletter

https://app.box.com/s/ror89kb3axefm6wu27ty6253m8m6lpn8


Wheat shortage
BY EDITORIAL , (LAST UPDATED 19 HOURS AGO)
Who has made a killing?
Whoever is responsible for the wheat shortage, is responsible for a lot of misery. The jump in the price of the nation’s principle staple has not led to famine, but could easily do so. It should not be forgotten that, as recently as World War II, there was a terrible famine in Bengal. That was probably caused by exports of rice from India to the UK. That decision took place because the British government feared shortages for its fighting forces in the midst of a war. A similar reason seems to prevail at present, though the justification is not a war, but the greed of people also powerful enough to get permission to export wheat. The blame game between the central and Sindh governments seems to boil down to the export of what were actually buffer stocks.
Wheat is harvested once a year in Pakistan, in Rabi (the staple in Kharif being rice). At the time of harvest, when the new wheat arrives to the market, prices are at their lowest. Prices gradually rise until the new crop is due to arrive. They do not rise catastrophically, because the federal and provincial governments release wheat stocks to millers which they have purchased at the time of the harvest. It appears this buffer was exported. The government has taken a novel approach: it insists that there is no shortage. This is the line taken by the Planning Minister as well as the Food Security Minister. However, the very decision to import wheat, which was taken to calm the markets and bring down prices, shows that there is a serious problem.
Even before the wheat crisis is over, there is a sugar crisis looming. Though not a staple, sugar is the only sweetener available to people. Again, the cause is supposed to be an over-enthusiasm to export. It makes no sense to earn foreign exchange by exporting, only to spend that foreign exchange on importing wheat or sugar later. There are arising cries from all quarters for a thorough probe. The government should conduct one, so that if there are any persons in the government who connived at these shortages, they should be unmasked and punished. In this way, the government will show that it is as committed to good governance as it claims.

https://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/2020/01/22/wheat-shortage/


From Pakistan to the Caribbean: Curry's journey around the world
Kate Springer, CNN • Updated 23rd January 2020
Curry around the world: Curry is not a single spice, nor is it related to the namesake curry tree (though the leaves are used in many dishes in India). The catch-all umbrella term refers to a "spiced meat, fish or vegetable stew" either freshly prepared as a powder or spice paste or purchased as a ready-made mixture," writes Colleen Sen in her book "Curry: A Global History."
Shutterstock
(CNN) — In 2019, ubiquitous Japanese curry house chain CoCo Ichibanya restaurant announced plans to bring its popular "curry rice" to India in 2020.
It might seem counter-intuitive to eat CoCo Ichibanya's relatively mild, sweet Japanese dish in the land of curry.
But the move underscores the sheer variety and complexity of curry -- a word that's long been misunderstood.
Curry is not a single spice, nor is it related to the namesake curry tree (though the leaves are used in many dishes in India).
The catch-all umbrella term refers to a "spiced meat, fish or vegetable stew," either freshly prepared as a powder or spice paste or purchased as a ready-made mixture," writes Colleen Sen in her book "Curry: A Global History."
According to Sen's book, the word curry most likely comes from a misunderstanding of the southern Indian word "kari," which "denoted a spiced dish of sauteed vegetables and meat."
"In the 17th century, the Portuguese [who colonized Goa in western India] took the word to mean a 'spiced stew' over rice and 'kari' eventually became 'caril' or 'caree' in Portuguese, then 'curry' in English," Sen tells CNN Travel.
Curry, which is thought to have originated as early as 2500 BCE in what is modern-day Pakistan, has since evolved into a truly global food, having traveled the world through colonization and immigration, indentured labor, trade and entrepreneurship.
Today, curry is everywhere, from chicken tikka masala in the UK to fiery green curry in Thailand, kare raisu in Japan and curry goat in Jamaica.
"I don't think there's a place in the world that doesn't have some kind of curry," says Sen.
If you're a curry lover, follow your cravings around the world by heading to these 12 destinations:

India


Butter chicken curry with basmati rice and limes.
Shutterstock
Indian cuisine is incredibly diverse and complex, with local specialties and traditions varying from state to state and community to community.
It's impossible to sum up India's various "curries" in a few lines. But if there's one dish that can be found on menus across the country, it'd be murgh makhani -- better known around the world as butter chicken.
This famous dish -- created by chef and restaurateur Kundan Lal Gujral in New Delhi in 1948 -- stars yogurt-marinated chicken baked in a tandoor oven, then smothered in a rich creamy sauce of tomatoes, onions and spices.
Vindaloo is another famous export and a must-try when in its hometown of Goa. Derived from the Portuguese phrase, "vinha d'alhos" (meaning meat marinated in garlic and wine vinegar), this hot and spicy dish is traditionally made with pork, vinegar, tomato, onion, red chillies, garlic and a complicated spice mix.
Other delicious curry dishes include: Fragrant, creamy korma (a once imperial Mughal dish made with a yogurt sauce, turmeric and nut paste); rogan josh (an aromatic curry usually made with slow-cooked lamb or mutton); sweet and sour dhansak lentil curry from the Parsi community; chickpea-centric chana masala (masala meaning "a mix of ground spices"); peppery saag with mustard greens from northern India; maacher jhol fish curry from West Bengal; and warming rajma masala from the Punjab region.

Japan

Japan's thick and mellow curry usually features chunks of stewed beef, onions and carrots over a bed of rice.
JNTO
Typically mild and thick, Japanese curry, kare raisu, is eaten across the country and even considered a de facto national dish, alongside ramen.
"In a survey, the Japanese named curry rice as one of their three favorite home-cooked dishes, while Japanese schoolchildren voted it the best meal served in the lunch program," says Sen.
"It is the Japanese version of comfort food, with no pretensions to class or elegance."
Curry has a long history in the country, thought to have been introduced by British officers and merchants in the 1800s.
"At the beginning of the Meiji Era (1868-1912) Japanese ports were first opened to foreigners," explains Sen.
"The Japanese military wanted to encourage meat consumption as a way of building up the strength of Japanese youth, and curry with rice was an ideal way to incorporate vegetables, rice and meat into one inexpensive yet substantial meal."
Related content
Usually cooked with pre-made spice mixes or curry roux, Japan's thick and mellow variation usually features chunks of stewed beef, onions and carrots over a bed of rice.
Some curry blends, such as the popular Vermont Curry, also incorporate honey and grated apple to add sweetness.
Another common incarnation of curry in Japan is the ever-satisfying katsu karē, a hearty dish of crispy fried pork cutlets (called tonkatsu) and a thick, brown gravy over rice.
"Japanese curry is very interesting to me -- it's the antithesis of Japanese food, which is so elegant and beautifully presented," adds Sen.
"The curry is just a mess of brown sauce, but the Japanese just love it. It's the epitome of home cooking."

The Caribbean

A plate of Jamaican curried goat, served with traditional rice and peas.
Shutterstock
In the Caribbean, curry is particularly prevalent in former British colonies such as Jamaica, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Guyana and Trinidad and Tobago.
The arrival of curry in the region can be traced back to the mid-1800s, after the British Empire abolished slavery in 1833 and freed more than 800,000 African slaves around the world.
Since liberated slaves were no longer willing to work on sugar cane plantations, the British enlisted indentured laborers from the Indian subcontinent -- India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Maldives, Nepal and Sri Lanka -- to make up for the labor shortage.
According to Sen's book, 1.5 million Indians migrated to other parts of the British Empire between 1834 and 1917, including 114,000 to Trinidad and Tobago and 36,000 to Jamaica.
The mass migration resulted in an influx of new cooking techniques, ingredients and dishes, including curry.
In Trinidad and Tobago, curry has "become a symbol of national identity" over the past two centuries.
Curry dishes commonly feature crab, shrimp, duck, chickpeas, potatoes -- and lobster for celebrations -- as well as cumin-heavy sauces and roti on the side.
"In Trinidad, they use different spices based on what they have," says Sen. "So you see a lot of cumin, coriander, fenugreek [a herb similar to clover] and turmeric in a typical Trinidadian spice mixture."
Likewise, in Jamaica, a mix of British and Indian influence gave rise to a localized variety of curry goat -- the island's most popular curry dish.
Prepared on special occasions, curry goat is tender and aromatic, thanks to ingredients like coconut milk, garlic, onion, allspice, thyme, Scotch bonnet chilli peppers, tomatoes and lots of turmeric for a sunny yellow hue.

Thailand

Thailand's curry dishes often include coconut milk.
courtesy Mark Wiens
During the fourth century, Indian traders and Buddhist missionaries are thought to have disseminated spices and herbs like tamarind and garlic, shallots, ginger and lemongrass across Southeast Asia.
Later, in the 16th century, the Portuguese introduced chilli peppers -- now a staple ingredient in Thai food.
Over time, Thai people incorporated these ingredients into their own dishes, which gave rise to the country's famously aromatic, spicy curries.
Often made with coconut milk, Thai curry dishes vary across the country. Generally speaking, you'll see more drier varieties up north and wetter variations in central Thailand and down south, where coconut milk is more common.
Thai curries (or "gaeng" in Thai) come in a stoplight of colors -- red, yellow and green -- and strive to strike a balance between sweet, sour, salty and spicy.
Setting them apart, Thai curries typically contain fermented shrimp paste, as well as lemon juice, palm sugar and holy basil.
Of course, Thailand has more than just three types of curries -- these are just the basics.
Look for ultra-fiery khua kling dry beef curry from southern Thailand; rich, peanutty massaman curry that's common near the border with Malaysia; and panang curry, a slightly sweeter, milder variation of red curry, and dozens more.

Sri Lanka

Parippu, or dhal curry, is a staple in any Sri Lankan restaurant or household.
Mark Wiens/cnn
As a major link along ancient spice trade routes and a former British colony, Sri Lanka has a long relationship with curry.
"In the 19th century, the British established tea, cinnamon, rubber, sugar, coffee and indigo plantations on the island and brought in thousands of indentured laborers from Tamil Nadu [in southern India] to work on them," explains Sen.
In addition, the island is also home to millions of Sinhalese people, an ethnic group who emigrated from northern India thousands of years ago.
Thanks to influences from both the Sinhalese and southern Indian communities, curry comes in a rainbow of colors, from bright yellow to creamy white, bright red and rich brown.
Though flavors vary widely, curries often make use of ingredients like coconut milk, tamarind, Maldivian fish, green chili, mustard seed, coriander and cumin.
Among the many types of curries, look for popular varieties like parippu (dhal curry), polos (green jackfruit curry), rich red kukul mas (chicken curry), white chicken curry (usually made with aromatic lemongrass and pandan leaves) and ambul thiyal (sour fish curry).
To get the lay of the culinary land, sit down for "rice and curry."
This staple Sri Lankan meal includes rice, at least one curry, and anywhere from four to 12 side dishes of chutney, pickles and sambol (spicy condiments).
A few bites in and you'll be thankful for the rice -- Sri Lankan food can be gut-scorchingly spicy.
Related content

Pakistan

Pakistan's cuisine is heavily influenced by the Mughals (a Muslim dynasty that ruled India from 16th to 18th century).
Established in 1947 following the end of British colonial rule and the violent partition of India, Pakistan sees strong influences from the Mughals (a Muslim dynasty that ruled India from the early 16th to the mid-18th century) in its cuisine.
This majority Muslim country tends to prepare dishes with beef, chicken or fish as well as lots of spices, such as nutmeg, cumin, turmeric, bay leaves, cardamom and black pepper.
Curry is incredibly popular, with dozens of varieties on offer all over the country, from famous slow-cooked haleem (a stew-like dish of wheat, barley, meat, lentils and spices) to spicy karahi (made with garlic, spices, vinegar, tomatoes and onions with mutton or chicken), bitter gourd curry, saag (a spiced puree of spinach and mustard greens), chickpea curry and daal chawal, a must-try comfort food usually served with rice or roti.
The list doesn't end there: Don't miss a warming aloo gosht (meat and potato curry); hearty, rich mutton korma; lobia daal (black-eyed peas curry); and goat paya, a slow-cooked curry starring incredibly tender trotters.

Maldives

Mas riha is a popular Maldivian fish curry.
Shutterstock
The small island nation of the Maldives has a rich culinary scene that includes lots of curry.
Revolving around a trio of staple ingredients -- coconut, fish and various starches -- Maldivian food has been highly influenced by centuries of trade with India, Africa and the Middle East.
When it comes to curry, you can expect hot and spicy creations that often feature seafood and tropical fruit.
Typically consumed with rice or roshi flatbread, mas riha (fish curry) is one of the most common types of localized curries.
Creamy and decadent, this delicious dish is typically made with coconut milk, fresh chilies, cinnamon, a mix of spices and chunks of diced tuna.
Sweet and sour anbu riha (mango tuna curry) is another highlight, as is kukulhu riha (chicken curry).
You'll also find a wide variety of vegetarian curries, from eggplant to pumpkin, potato, cauliflower and green banana.
Bunny chow is a dish of Indian origin, made uniquely African. In the self-declared capital of African curry, Durban's claim on the dish runs deep.
In highly diverse South Africa, curry (or "kerries") can be traced to colonial times.
After the Dutch East India Company set up a settlement on the cape to facilitate trade between Europe and Southeast Asia in the mid-1600s, they shipped in slaves from Indonesia, Madagascar and India, who collectively formed the Cape Malay ethnic community.
Fusing their own traditions with readily available spices, Cape Malay cooks developed several styles of sweet and savory curries, from tomato-infused chicken curry to slow-cooked lamb curry.
Later, the British took over the cape and relocated hundreds of thousands of indentured workers from southern India to work on plantations.
Their influential cooking style gave rise to much-loved Durban curry -- a fiery, oily and robust red curry that's often made with lamb, chicken, fish and crab.
A few decades later, a wave of businessmen from India's western Gujarat state moved to South Africa, where many set up spice shops and restaurants.
These entrepreneurs are credited for the famous "bunny cho" -- essentially a bread bowl filled with curry and topped with Indian pickles.
"One explanation of its name is that in Durban, Indian merchants were often called 'banias,' the name of a caste of traders," explains Sen.
These traders opened small restaurants which, because of apartheid, black people couldn't enter -- but they could illegally be served at the back door. "The dish was named bunny chow, from 'bania chow,'" explains Sen.

Malaysia

Chicken curry kapitan is made from tamarind juice, candlenuts, fresh turmeric root and belacan (shrimp paste.)
Darshini Kandasamy
Due to its position along the Strait of Malacca, an important maritime trade route between east and west, Malaysia's culinary traditions have been influenced by centuries of cultural exchange.
From the late 1700s, Britain had a presence in several parts of present-day Malaysia and Singapore.
As with its many other trading ports and colonies, the British hired laborers from India to work on rubber and palm plantations.
With the immigrants came curry. Tangy fish head curry, Tamil-influenced chicken varuval, warming dalcha lentil curry ... Malaysia's curries are as delicious as they are diverse.
Nyonya cuisine -- dishes created by the Straits-Chinese community -- also plays an important role in Malaysia's culinary melting pot.
One of the best known Nyonya curries is kari ayam (bone-in chicken curry) which features a mix of Chinese techniques and Malaysian ingredients, including shrimp paste, coconut milk, star anise, cinnamon, fish sauce, kaffir lime, turmeric, ginger and more.
Sen also points to curry chicken kapitan, which sees pieces of chicken sauteed in curry paste then simmered in coconut milk, tangy tamarind water and aromatic cinnamon.
Another popular dish that's enjoyed across Malaysia and Indonesia, particularly during holidays and festivals, is rendang.
Well known around the world, this relatively dry curry dish is made with beef or chicken braised in a sauce of coconut milk, lemongrass, ginger, and cinnamon for an ultra-tender texture.

Indonesia

Rich and spicy gulai is a popular Indonesia curry dish.
Melanie Wood/CNN
Like Malaysia, Indonesia sees notable influences from Indian, Chinese and Middle Eastern food traditions thanks to centuries of international trade and colonization.
The sheer variety of curries across the nation's 17,000-some islands is astounding, with dishes evolving based on whatever local meats and vegetables are available.
Depending on which region you're exploring, look for dishes like gulai kambing (a rich, spicy coconut milk-based lamb curry), kari ayam (chicken curry), and world-famous rendang.
To try a few curries in one go, a nasi padang experience is your best bet.
At this buffet-like meal, you can choose a sampling of spicy sambals and curries -- like gulai otak (brain curry), gulai kepala ikan (fish head curry) in a creamy coconut sauce, and gulai cubadak (unripe jackfruit curry).

South Korea

Curry tteokbokki is made with rice and fish cakes, veggies and eggs.
courtesy Korean Tourism Organization
In South Korea, curry is said to have begun making an appearance in the cuisine after World War II.
Before and during the war, Japan controlled Korea and roughly 2.4 million Korean people lived in Japan.
"Many had migrated during the 1920s; some were taken as forced labor before and during World War II," explains Sen. "After Japan's surrender, most were repatriated to Korea -- only about 600,000 remained."
While in Japan, Koreans became familiar with many local foods, including curry, and later tried to recreate the recipes at home.
Curry proliferated after a company called Ottogi produced ready-to-make curry powders and instant curries in the 1960s.
Since then, Sen says curry rice (a stew of beef, carrots, potatoes and onions over rice) and curry tteokbokki -- a stew-like gravy with tteok (rice cakes), fish cakes, vegetables and eggs -- have become two of the most popular home-cooked meals.
Related content

The UK

Tikka Masala is believed to have been invented in the UK.
Peter Macdiarmid/Getty Images Europe/Getty Images
Owing to its long relationship with India, the UK has been putting its own spin on curry since the 18th century .
Curry-like dishes and other Indian fare began appearing on coffee house menus after members of the British colonial administration who lived in India returned home and craved a taste of their life abroad.
Around the same time, inventive merchants bottled up pre-mixed curry powders and exported them across the empire.
In 1810, the first dedicated curry house, Hindoostane Coffee House, opened its doors in Marylebone, London, and though it did not succeed, curry houses became increasingly common.
Related content
Curry further cemented itself as part of British food traditions after the arrival of tens of thousands of Indian immigrants in the early 20th century and, later, an influx of Bangladeshi immigrants in the 1970s -- many of whom set up restaurants.
"Curry is hugely popular in the UK," says Sen. "The Brits really love it -- they invented tikka masala there, because India has been a part of the British psyche for so long."
Today, curry remains an unofficial national dish -- it's so popular, the country celebrates National Curry Week every October.
Whether you're at a casual curry house after a night out or an upscale Indian restaurant, choose from anglo-Indian variations of spicy vindaloos, mild and creamy chicken tikka masala, tomato-packed Madras curries, rogan josh, red-hot chicken jalfrezi and creamy korma.

https://edition.cnn.com/travel/article/curry-origins-history/index.html

 Lessons from China

 

On 10th January 2020, a glittering function was held in The Great Hall of the People in Beijing with several thousand dignitaries. It was presided over by Chinese President Xi Jinping.

Present were also the prime minister, the deputy prime minister, other cabinet ministers and all top scientists of China. The function was held to honour top scientists of China and the world. The highest scientific award of China, the International Science and Technology Collaboration Award, was conferred on 10 foreign scientists. I was one of those chosen to receive this honour from President Xi himself, the first scientist from the Islamic world to be decorated.

The journey that led to this award started in 1974 with my first visit to China. I delivered a lecture at the Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry and met a science giant of China, Prof Wang Yu, who had succeeded in carrying out the first synthesis of insulin, in the face of fierce US competition. Over the years we have developed collaborations with China in many fields. These include AI with the Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technologies and Guandong University, Hybrid Rice Seed Production with the China National Rice Research Institute, and Virology with the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

These collaborations have led to many joint discoveries including an exciting Chinese herbal drug which was tested at the International Center for Chemical and Biological Sciences at the University of Karachi for its activity against Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and found to be as effective as ampicillin. It will soon be marketed in Pakistan.

This was not my first meeting with President Xi of China. In 2017, I was formally inducted by him in the same space as an Academician of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, a unique honour, and in 2014 I received the highest award of China for foreigners, the Friendship Award from him.

Another humbling experience was the inauguration of a six-storey research building in my name on October 24, 2019 at a special function that corresponded with a huge international conference at the Hunan University of Chinese Medicine in Changsha. The research centre was named the ‘Academician Professor Atta-ur-Rahman One Belt and One Road Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) Research Center’. The function in China was attended by our Federal Minister of Science and Technology Fawad Hussain Chaudhry.

My linkages with China over the last 45 years have given me an opportunity to study the developments in China in some depth. The reforms in science institutions were three pronged. First, the funding system to science institutions was reformed and scientists were forced to carry out contract research for private enterprises, offer consultancy services and undertake entrepreneurial activities so that science had an impact on society.

Applied research was encouraged through incentives such as licensing of technology developed by institutions, establishing onsite manufacturing operations and creating technology based spinoffs. Public funding was directed towards basic research only in strategic high-technology industries.

Second, emphasis was given to proper R&D management. The improvements included measures such as decentralization of decision-making, change in the evaluation criteria for measuring efficiency, fostering competition among organizations and diversifying their activities.

The third prong was to establish efficient linkages. Public-sector funding was offered to manufacturing industries for supporting R&D and for providing strong technical assistance from universities and research institutions.

The vision to use science and technology as engines for socio-economic development was reflected in funding allocations. China has now overtaken the US in terms of R&D expenditure. While R&D spending in the US grew only by 4.3 percent annually from 2000 to 2017, it grew by more than 17 percent annually in China during the same period. According to a report in the world’s leading science journal ‘Nature’ earlier this month: “The United States accounted for 25 percent of the US$2.2 trillion spent on R&D worldwide in 2017, and China made up 23 percent. Preliminary data from 2019 suggest that China has already surpassed the United States in R&D spending”.

The remarkable GDP growth rate of 8-11 percent of China has been based on the massive investments made in the development of highly skilled manpower. China is sending about 600,000 students to top universities of the world each year and about 500,0000 are now returning after PhDs or postdoctoral training each year and joining the workforce. The result is a mind-boggling rate of progress of China, particularly in the new and disruptive technologies that are predicted to have a global impact of over 100 trillion US dollars over the next ten years.

We must start a similar programme to send at least 10,000 students annually to top universities of the world. There must be jobs in universities and R&D institutes on their return. We must offer excellent salaries, research funding and infrastructure to attract them back as was done by us from 2002 to 2008. This will allow us to develop top centres of excellence in emerging technologies that can lay the foundations of the high-tech industry in Pakistan.

The path adopted by China has many lessons for us. Nations are not built by just building roads or houses. It is only through education, science, technology and innovation that we can march forward. Our single focus should be to manufacture and export high technology products. Science Minister Fawad Chaudhry and I met China’s Minister of Science and Technology Wang Zhigang on October 21, 2019.

My proposal that a joint China-Pakistan Committee be set up for the manufacture and export of high-technology products involving Chinese and Pakistani industries was enthusiastically accepted. The Chinese minister immediately nominated his member of the committee. This could be a game-changer for Pakistan if we can persuade leading Chinese industries to establish manufacturing operations in Pakistan under the CPEC initiative.

The snowball effect could change the fate of the country as CPEC could be the venue of the production and export of engineering goods, electronics, automobiles, aircraft, pharmaceuticals, industrial alloys, pharmaceuticals etc. To achieve this objective we must do whatever it takes. This should include offer of free land to joint manufacturing units, 50 percent discount on electricity and gas rates, a 15-year tax holiday, and insurance against disruption of industrial production due to the law and order situation.

Our prime minister and our Minister of Planning should carefully consider these suggestions. The path to socio-economic development lies only in education, science, technology and innovation and there are many lessons in this respect that we can learn from China.

The writer is the formerchairman of the HEC, andpresident of the Network of Academies of Science of OIC Countries (NASIC). Email: ibne_sina@hotmail.com

https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/602149-lessons-from-china

 

Seeds of Hope

India’s premier farm research and education institute has a full-time director after nearly four years.

Written by Harish Damodaran | New Delhi | Updated: January 23, 2020 7:44:34 am
New IARI director Ashok Kumar Singh with a farmer
It is an institution whose blockbuster varieties account for more than 95% of the country’s Rs 32,800-crore annual basmati rice export revenues, nearly half of its total wheat area, and a quarter of that sown under mustard. Yet, the Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI, better known as Pusa Institute) has an annual research budget of just over Rs 111 crore and, moreover, was without a regular director for almost four years until late last week.
Scientists at this premier constituent institute of the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) are behind the development of improved basmati paddy varieties such as Pusa-1121, Pusa-1509, Pusa Basmati-1, Pusa-1401 and, more recently, Pusa-1718 and Pusa-1637 that are resistant to bacterial blight and blast fungus diseases.
According to Commerce Ministry data, India’s basmati rice exports were worth $ 4.71 billion (Rs 32,804.30 crore) in 2018-19. Out of the total estimated 19.39 lakh hectares (lh) area planted under basmati in 2019, the major share was of IARI varieties, including Pusa-1121 (9.41 lh), Pusa-1509 (4.86 lh), Pusa-1401 (1.57 lh) and Pusa Basmati-1 (1.49 lh). Their combined contribution to basmati shipments in value terms would have exceeded 95%.
No less has been IARI’s role in breeding the dwarf wheat varieties that produced India’s Green Revolution — from Kalyan Sona and Sonalika in the mid-sixties to HD-2285 (released in 1982) and HD-2329 (1985) — and also the newer generation high-yielding and rust-resistant HD-2967 (2011), HD-3086 (2013), HDCSW-18 (2016) and HD-3226 (2019). The last two “climate-smart” varieties have been specifically bred for conservation agriculture — sowing directly on fields containing leftover paddy stubble without recourse to burning — and are also amenable to early sowing (by last week of October) for harvesting by end-March (to withstand any spike in temperatures or premature onset of summer).
The IARI wheat varieties, again, cover some 140 lh out of the country’s average area of 300 lh. These include HD-2967 (70 lh), HD-3086 (30 lh) and others grown in 20 lh each of Central (HI-1544, HI-1605, HD-2932, HI-8663, HI-8713, HI-8759 and HI-8737) and Eastern India (HD-2733, HD-2851, HD-3059 and HI-1500). Given their higher yields, they would easily have a more than 50% share of India’s annual wheat production of 100 million tonnes.
 Green Revolution legends M S Swaminathan (left) and Norman Borlaug at Pusa Institute’s research field.
IARI’s research fields have, likewise, given a host of rapeseed-mustard varieties (Pusa Bold, Pusa Jaikisan, Pusa Vijay, and Pusa Mustard-25, 26, 27, 28, 29 and 30) that cover 25% of the roughly 65 lh area under this most widely-cultivated indigenous oilseed. A more recent breakthrough has been Pusa Double Zero Mustard-31, a “canola-grade” variety whose oil contains very low levels of glucosinolates (the source of pungency) and erucic acid (linked to cardiac muscle impairment risks). If the IARI varieties in other crops are included — chana or chickpea (BG-256 and BG-3062, which yields 2.4-2.5 tonnes per hectare and is also suitable for mechanised harvesting), vegetables (Pusa Ruby tomato, Pusa Purple Long brinjal and Pusa Sawani okra) and mango (Amrapali and Mallika) — it adds up to a substantial and tangible contribution.
The irony, however, is that IARI’s budget for 2019-20 is a mere Rs 570.35 crore, of which only Rs 20.65 crore is dedicated towards research and the rest going towards meeting salary, pension, maintenance and other administrative expenses. Apart from the budget support of Rs 20.65 crore for research, IARI is raising Rs 91 crore through externally funded projects — mainly from other government bodies (Department of Biotechnology, Science & Technology and Council of Scientific & Industrial Research), the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and some private contract research.
The silver lining is that the venerable institution — which also has a post-graduate school with about 820 PhD and 320 MSc & MTech students — is not headless now: Ashok Kumar Singh was appointed as full-time director on January 18, nearly four years after Trilochan Mohapatra had left to become director-general of ICAR on February 22, 2016.
Previously head of IARI’s Division of Genetics, Dr Singh is primarily a paddy breeder who was actively involved in developing the basmati varieties — especially Pusa-1121 (the world’s longest cooked rice grain) and Pusa-1509 (the most water-saving high-yielding aromatic rice, with a seed-to-grain duration of just 115-120 days) — that have led to India’s exports zooming from $ 433.73 million in 2003-04 to $ 4.71 billion in 2018-19.
“Resource generation is going to be a priority for me,” Dr Singh tells The Indian Express. He identifies three sources from where this could come. The first is royalty on seeds from IARI-bred varieties. “For wheat, farmers generally sow 100 kg per hectare and the seed price is about Rs 40/kg. In paddy, it is 15 kg per hectare, with the price at Rs 70/kg for basmati and Rs 40-50/kg for non-basmati varieties. Why cannot we be given some part of that price as royalty?,” he asks.
IARI supplies breeder seeds of its varieties that are multiplied into foundation and further to certified seeds for sale to farmers. One quintal of breeder paddy seeds typically results in 150 quintals of foundation, which, in turn, yields 22,500 quintals (150*150) of certified seeds. “Right now, the indents from state governments and seed companies, both public and private sector, come to us through the Union Agriculture Ministry and we have to make the breeder material available accordingly. There should be a Pusa Beej (seed) royalty. Even if it is small, the potential revenue is huge, given the sheer area covered by our varieties,” points out Dr Singh.
A similar mechanism can be worked out for levying a cess on the produce of Pusa varieties arriving in mandis and on export of basmati rice from the country. “The monies from all this would ultimately be ploughed back for breeding and research work. Farmers will be the last to object,” he adds.
What are going to be IARI’s new research focus areas? “Breeding for nutrition will certainly receive attention. We have recently released Pusa Vivek QPM9 Improved, a hybrid maize rich in pro-vitamin A as well as lysine and tryptophan (essential amino acids). There is also Pusa-1201, an iron and zinc fortified bajra (pearl-millet). Normal bajra has 30 mg/kg of iron, which is twice in our bio-fortified variety. Instead of spending Rs 4 on an iron capsule containing 20 mg, you can get thrice that from bio-fortified bajra. The government can incentivise farmers to grow the variety by paying a higher minimum support price and include it under the public distribution system,” suggests Dr Singh.

https://indianexpress.com/article/india/pusa-iari-agriculture-research-seeds-of-hope-6230739/

Bayer and neonicotinoids in Japan

Phil Carter

23rd January 2020

German pesticide manufacturer Bayer attempted to discredit the rigorous peer-reviewed study that proved that its products caused a fishery to collapse in Japan.
I still remember the only dragonfly I saw in the rice-fields near the Arakawa River in Saitama Prefecture, Japan in 2019. It was large, with a rust-brown body and it paused for a moment, balancing on the air, before darting away.
I had observed the rice cultivation there all year, from when the pesticides were sprayed on the crop until the harvest, and dragonflies and other insects were conspicuous by their absence.
In Japan, as in rice-fields worldwide, spraying is usually with broad-spectrum neonicotinoid pesticides or else fipronil, both developed by German chemical company Bayer. Neonicotinoids are the subject of a ban for outdoor use in the European Union and fipronil, which is now marketed by another company, has been banned in China.
Dead zone
The May 2019 newsletter of the Saitama Ecosystem Conservation Society describes how, before the introduction of these chemicals in the 1990s, numberless brilliant red akiakane or autumn darter dragonflies could be seen around rice fields in the fall.
These dragonflies, which have their larval nymph stage in the water of rice paddy fields, are an eye-catching indicator species for other water insects in the ricefield ecosystem. Some are considered by farmers as pests, and the powerful insecticides from Bayer offered a solution - but in doing so the rice fields became a dead zone except for the rice plants.
Experiments by Japanese dragonfly expert Tetsuyuki Ueda of Ishikawa Prefectural University showed how the pesticides reduced the number of surviving dragonfly nymphs to a small fraction, and that they persist for years in the soil of rice paddy fields.
In addition, the poison was getting into the rivers, and in Lake Shinji in Shimane Prefecture in the west of the main Japanese island of Honshu, it accumulated. Lake Shinji is surrounded by rice paddy fields, and in November 2019 a team of Japanese scientists led by Dr. Masumi Yamamuro published a study in the prestigious peer-reviewed journal Science showing how the important fishery there collapsed after the introduction of Bayer’s pesticides, and has not recovered. 
Nearly 300 tons of smelt was caught annual in the late 1980s, but since 1993 - when neonicotinoids were introduced in the lake watershed - the smelt catch collapsed to zero and has stayed there.
The study explored different possible reasons for the collapse and clearly demonstrated that it was due to several types of neonicotinoid poison that had killed the insects the fish feed on.
Integrity 
While Japan is a wealthy country with other food supplies, Yamamuro’s team said that the same thing was almost certainly happening in rice farming countries worldwide. This conclusion has chilling implications for poorer countries where Bayer does business, and the loss of a fishery can be literally life or death for local people.
In a statement by email, Bayer spokesperson Carlota Gomez said that Bayer’s CSR sets high standards: “Raising the bar in transparency, sustainability and engagement with all stakeholders including the scientific community with integrity and respect.”
However, Gomez repeated Bayer’s earlier dismissal of Yamamuro’s study, as reported by Douglas Main writing for National Geographic. Gomez said that it was wrong due to the “scientific methods and data interpretation.”
No evidence or details were offered as to why the study, which was painstaking and careful in its methods and conclusions, was mistaken.
Yamamuro, who has a Ph.D. from the University of Tokyo, explained by email that the strict peer review process for Science took seven months, with the journal sending the study to two anonymous reviewers, whose criticisms had to be answered before the journal would publish.
Disinformation 
In a world that has become used to terms like “fake news” and “alternative facts”, peer-reviewed results of studies by reputed scientists may be considered as truth when multiple reports give the same result.
The unfounded and repeated claim by Bayer that the methods and conclusions of the Lake Shinji study are wrong is therefore part of a continuing disinformation campaign against scientists that criticise the company, with the sole aim of maximizing profits for shareholders.
The implications are ominous. The scrupulous study by Yamamuro’s team has brought a terrifying new word into focus that is likely to be attached by future generations to Bayer in much the same way as climate change denial has been to the fossil fuel industry. The word is “trophic cascade”, describing how the loss of the insects at the bottom of the food chain leads inevitably to the collapse of everything dependent on it. 
However, Bayer has so far felt safe to ignore this hard reality, perhaps thinking that there is no economic impact, and there is no sign the company is taking the issue seriously.
On the contrary, Bayer appealed to the European Court of Justice against the European Union’s ban on all outdoor use of neonicotinoids, losing in May 2018 when the court ruled that it was an appropriate application of the precautionary principle. Peer-reviewed studies that were bitterly disputed by Bayer linked the chemicals to declining bee populations. 
Deformities 
In Japan, the chemicals remain in use, and Jun Hoshikawa of Act Beyond Trust, an NGO that campaigns against systemic pesticides, said by email that Japan has weak laws because Bayer and other pesticide manufacturers have a strong influence the regulatory process.
Yamamuro’s team showed the effects of this combined lobbying and sales effort clearly, with sales of neonicotinoids increasing four-fold from 2000 to 2016 in Shimane Prefecture where Lake Shinji is located. The study also points to a cumulative effect of different kinds of neonicotinoid making them even more dangerous.
To the south of Lake Shinji on the west coast of the Japanese island of Kyushu, the town of Minamata and the chemical company Chisso Corporation became synonymous with horrific human consequences of a trophic cascade due to denial of chemical pollution.
For decades from the 1930s, organic mercury was discharged by Chisso into the ocean, contaminating the fish. A series of terrible birth deformities due to local people eating the fish was memorably recorded by the photographer W. Eugene Smith.
Scientific studies showed a likely link with Chisso, but the company disputed the link and refused to voluntarily stop the discharge. Eventually, under international pressure due to Smith’s photographs, the Japanese government enacted strict pollution control laws in the 1970s and the pollution, and the deformities, ended.
Responsibility 
Is Bayer’s published Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) policy simply in place to distract from the business of making money from ecosystem-wide devastation? The evidence points in this direction.
The CSR section of the company’s website talks about their commitment to the environment. It states: “In the course of our business activities, we aim to use natural resources responsibly and respect biodiversity”. But the reality is one of relentlessly trying to undermine and discredit any reports, including peer-reviewed studies, that show the company’s products harm the environment.
Their propaganda mirrors methods that have been honed to an art form by petrochemical companies’ denial of climate change, following Chisso Corporation’s denials in Japan over Minamata disease. However, terrible though the deformities of Minamata disease were, the effects of the new wave of greenwashing are likely to be much graver. 
The world depends on insects, and multiple studies show that insect populations are disappearing. Long-term studies are crucial to understanding this because insects can reproduce rapidly in response to favorable conditions, but an emerging consensus is that a mass extinction event is underway and that broad-spectrum systemic pesticides including neonicotinoids are a major cause.
University of California professor Art Shapiro, who has carried out one of the longest continuous studies of butterflies in California over 47 years, is reported as saying that a long-term decline is occurring and pinpoints a major decline that occurred in the 1990s at the same time as neonicotinoid pesticides came into widespread use. This is the same as Yamamuro’s team found in Lake Shinji and dragonfly experts have found elsewhere in Japan.
Trophic cascade
Bayer spokesperson Gomez said: “We do acknowledge that a decline of insect abundance is currently being reported from various parts of the world.”
However, Gomez categorically rejected any role played by Bayer’s products, saying: “There is no evidence which would point to pesticides as a key factor” and further, “there is no evidence of a causal link between the decline of insects and the use of neonicotinoids in agriculture.” 
I believe this is a misleading statement given the increasing number of conscientious peer-reviewed studies, such as the one by Yamamuro’s team, which show the opposite. 
Meanwhile, in a sign that a trophic cascade is indeed underway across Japan, another peer-reviewed study by Satoe Kasahara and Kazuo Koyama published in the journal Ornithological Science in 2010 shows that birds using rice fields suffered a long-term decline in numbers from 1996 to 2009.
They say that changes in cultivation methods in rice fields are a likely factor, which points to the introduction of neonicotinoids that began around 1993.
Return 
On the island of Kyushu to the south of the toxic waste site that Lake Shinji has become, protected from the chemical companies by the laws related to Aso-Kuju National Park, I learned about rice farming without pesticides.
The Kuju Home Village Nature School (Kuju Furusato Shizen Gakko), is a nature center in a protected area high in the mountains of central Kyushu which maintains traditional rice farming methods to pass them to future generations.
Walking around the grass at the edge of the rice paddy, startled frogs jump into the water. According to Hideyuki Abe of the center, eight species of dragonfly were observed in 2019 including the iconic autumn darter. The center maintains its rice field in the rhythm of the seasons as people have for two thousand years in Japan, patiently educating children and the public about what they have lost.
The red dragonflies return in the autumn, a brilliant signal that all is well with the ecosystem and the aquatic insects that form the basis of the food chain and fisheries in surrounding rivers and lakes.
Will the Japanese people wake up from the hypnotism of corporate disinformation and spin to realize what has happened and demand action as they did after the Minamata tragedy, allowing the dragonflies to return to the rest of Japan?
This Author
Phil Carter is a freelance environmental journalist based in Saitama, Japan. 

New survey results reveal the experts and public's attitude towards gene-edited crops

A Japanese farmer working in the field of Northern Japan. The country has long been working on crop breeding including rice for many years. Rice is originally grown in tropics. However, plant breeding techniques enabled rice to grown in colder climate. The plant breeding in early times relied on farmers' intuition, but today, three breeding technologies shown below are used. Credit: Hisashi Urashima
Experts' interest in utilizing gene editing for breeding crops has seen revolutionary growth. Meanwhile, people's awareness of food safety has also been increasing. To understand the attitudinal difference among experts and public towards gene-edited crops, a team of Japanese researchers, led by Dr. Naoko Kato-Nitta, a research scientist at the Joint Support-Center for Data Science Research and The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Tokyo, Japan, conducted a survey of perceptions of the Japanese experts and public to gene editing versus other emerging or conventional breeding techniques in Japan, where the production of genetically modified crops is strictly regulated and not readily accepted.
Their findings were published on November 5th, 2019 in Palgrave Communications.
The authors conducted experimental web-based surveys to obtain clearer understanding of both experts and public perception of the benefits, risks and value of utilizing gene editing technology for the breeding of crops compared to other technologies. Participants for surveys consisted of 3,197 volunteers of the lay public and scientists with and without expertise in molecular biology.
According to the study, participants who had expert knowledge of molecular biology perceived emerging technologies to offer the lowest risk and highest benefits or value for food application, while lay public showed the highest risk and lowest benefit. Experts from other disciplines had similar perceptions to the lay public in terms of the risk, but similar perceptions to the molecular biology experts in terms of value. The lay public tended to perceive gene-edited crops as being both more beneficial and valuable than other genetically modified crops, while also posing less risk. Even though the differences in perception between gene editing and genetic modification was very small compared to the differences in perception between genetic modification and conventional plant breeding techniques, obtaining such results from the participants living in Japan, may hold great potential for this emerging technology.
Tomato is a fine model plant among biologists. Credit: Naoko Kato-Nitta, the Joint Support-Center for Data Science Research and The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Tokyo, Japan.
Additionally, "the results enabled us to elucidate the deficit model's boundary conditions in science communication by proposing two new hypotheses," said Kato-Nitta. The model's assumption is that as scientific knowledge increases, so too does public acceptance of new technologies. "Firstly, this assumption was valid only for conventional science, knowledge of which can be acquired through classroom education, but not valid for emerging science, such as gene editing, knowledge on which may be acquired mainly through informal learning," Kato-Nitta said. "Secondly, the model's assumption on emerging science is valid only for increasing benefit perceptions but not for reducing risk perceptions."
Food scarcity is becoming a worldwide problem and the famine is frequently found in many regions on the earth. One of the major reasons for this is the rapid increase of the global population which has reached 7.7 billion, and is still growing, whereas areas of farmable land have been continuingly decreasing because of reasons such as extensive industrial or urban development, extended droughts and other extreme weather conditions. To compensate with the increasing needs for crops, enhancement of production through breeding has also been a powerful tool for farmers to produce more crop products from their limited resources in addition to the extensive usage of fertilizers and pesticides. Recent development of recombinant DNA technology, which is commonly called genetic engineering technology, and its adaptation to crops are believed to speed up the time-consuming breeding processes and to widen the range of genetic features to the original plants such as enhancement of nutritional value, resistance to drought, frost, or pests, for example.
The gene editing technology has been very tantalizing for molecular biologists, and in theory offers significant potential to improve global food security; however, there are many people who are not convinced and remain somewhat skeptical, preferring to take a more cautious approach to how we produce the food that ultimately goes into our bodies and which significantly contributes to our overall health and well-being.
There are two viewpoints concerning gene editing. The first, known as product-based policy, views gene editing as technology through which no foreign genetic material is added, that is more similar to conventional plant breeding procedure than genetic modification. The second, known as process-based policy views gene editing similar to that of genetic modification, as both require genetic manipulation to achieve the desired results, but gene editing can just do so quicker. In their study, experts in molecular biology tended to adopt product-based policy, while non-specialists tended to take the process-based policy.
Information on technological differences. Information provision by illustrations with text to explain the differences among the three existing breeding technologies of conventional breeding, genetic modification, and gene editing. Credit: Palgrave Communications (2019). DOI: 10.1057/s41599-019-0328-4
For many, the potential benefits associated with utilizing these unconventional plant breeding methods are not worth the potential risks. But are these attitudes and beliefs influenced by lack of sufficient scientific knowledge of the subject, and can they be changed if the information is passed on from experts in an effort to improve public scientific literacy? This concept, which is known as the deficit model of science communication, attributes public skepticism of science and technology to a lack of understanding, arising from lack of scientific literacy or knowledge on the subject. Their research statistically elucidates where such explanation types are valid and where they are not.
According to Kato-Nitta, their findings suggest that people perceive gene editing to have greater potential than genetic modification, especially in terms of the benefit aspects of utilizing this technology. "We still have to be cautious in terms of people's attitude toward the risk and value aspects associated with this technology," she noted. "In the survey, the experts in other field perceived even more risk in gene editing than genetic modification in terms of "Possibility of misusing this technology."
"I hope my research will help to narrow the gap between scientific experts and the public." said Kato-Nitta. "The scientific experts need to understand the diverse range of people outside their domain-specific community. I am currently working on developing a new model on public communication of science and technology that can explain the key factors that affect various facets of people's attitudes toward emerging science more comprehensively than the previous studies have done."

 We must sustain local rice consumption

Business News of Wednesday, 22 January 2020
Source: Daily Graphic

Daily Graphic Editorial

The sudden development of taste for locally produced rice among Ghanaians is a healthy sign for local farmers and those in the rice value chain.
This is particularly so when, in the recent past, locally produced rice never had space in the rice demand equation in a country where emphasis was placed on imported rice.

Ghanaians never had faith in locally produced rice because it was seen as inferior to its preferred foreign counterpart, which enjoyed monopoly until now.

That situation led to financial institutions shying away from supporting the local rice value chain operators, thereby constraining local operators from operating at full capacity because of lack of funds.

The situation got the point where the Minister of Food and Agriculture (MoFA), Dr Owusu Afriyie Akoto, had to intervene and set up a Rice Technical Team, made up of the MoFA, the Ministry of Finance, rice importers, rice processors and rice millers, to discuss the way forward to ending the importation of rice and making the country attain rice sufficiency by 2022.

The Daily Graphic lauds the initiative to set up the Rice Technical Team, which has the potential to save the millions of dollars used to import rice from outside.

This surely resonates with the Presidents Ghana Beyond Aid agenda and must be pursued vigorously to achieve rice sufficiency in the country. We believe this is doable.

For instance, in 2017, out of the 1,089,000 metric tonnes (MT) of rice consumed in the country, only 433,000MT was produced locally and we had to import about 656,000MT to be able to meet the national demand.

In 2018, out of over 1.12million metric tonnes of national demand, only 456,000MT was produced locally, leaving an excess of about 665,670MT to be supplied from importation.

But the story changed in 2019 when MoFA stepped in to provide subsided improved seeds and fertilizer for rice farmers.

Following the intervention, the quantity of locally produced rice jumped to 784,875MT, leaving a deficit of just 370,445MT.

It is projected that by 2021, locally produced rice will exceed one million metric tonnes and we will be required to top up with only 47,554MT in order to meet the national rice demand, while in 2022 we will need to import only 3,073MT to meet the national demand for rice.

Indeed, the MoFA has projected that by 2023 Ghana would have met its rice demand, with an excess of 365,302MT for export. As a nation, we must continue taking steps to promote the consumption of local rice to put money in the pockets of our hardworking farmers. What we have forgotten is that the more rice we import, the richer foreign farmers become, while our own rice farmers become poorer.

The Daily Graphic, therefore, urges both the MoFA and the Ministry of Finance to support rice farmers to be able to secure funding from financial institutions to be able to increase their production and also for the milers to be able to increase their production and also for the millers to be able to off-take paddy rice at the farms.

The claim by local rice millers that they could not meet the market demand for locally milled rice during the Yuletide should be worrying news to those who believe in Ghana.

We know for a fact that the local millers could not meet the market demand not because there was no paddy rice mill but that the millers did not have enough funds to off-take all the paddy rice from farmers.

We believe that this is the time to resource rice millers with funding facilities to enable them to mill all the rice produced locally. The MoFA and the Ministry of Finance should serve as collateral for farmers to assess funding from the financial institutions which demand collateral and other facilities before giving out loans to these farmers.

This is the time to sustain the interest in local rice and the onus is on MoFA and the Ministry of Finance to support the farmers and those in the rice value chain to keep up the momentum.

This is the only way we can realise the President’s Ghana Beyond Aid agenda.
Supply constraints threaten to disrupt rice prices
Louise Maureen SimeonDelon Porcalla (The Philippine Star) - January 23, 2020 - 12:00am
MANILA, Philippines — The relatively stable prices of rice in the local market may suddenly spiral out of control after Vietnam and Thailand the country’s two biggest rice suppliers decided to cut exports of the staple.
Former Butil Farmers party-list Rep. Cecil Chavez has warned that the Philippines may be at the losing end once its ASEAN neighbors start to reduce exports to prioritize their own rice requirements.
“No one seems to be paying attention to these grim developments on the rice supply front. There should be a strong, coordinated response to supply woes and the now-reduced paddy production in our own country,” Chavez said.
Instead, what we are seeing is either indifference or complacency,” she said.
VietnamNet Global reported that Vietnam’s rice sector is facing difficulties this year amid strong volatility on production, demand and prices. The country’s land use for growing rice  is  also seen to reduce.Production is expected to decline by as much as seven percent to 41.5 million metric tons due to water supply and weather disturbance problems and farmers’ decision to shift to more profitable crops.
Hanoi was the Philippines’ biggest rice supplier in 2019 where 2.1 million MT of the  Philippines’ total three million MT rice imports were shipped from Vietnamese ports.
On the other hand, the United States Department of Agriculture sees Thai rice exports declining to the lowest level in seven years as supplies fall and prices remain high.
USDA said the strengthening of Thailand’s currency has also affected exports with the baht now at a six-year high.
Thailand competes with more competitive Indian and Vietnamese rice, which are priced about 20 percent lower.
“Looking ahead to 2020, Thailand’s export prospects are grim. Lower demand from key markets and uncompetitive pricing, compounded with a severe drought, are expected to decimate offseason rice production. With tighter supplies, Thai exports are likely to remain at low levels,” USDA said.
Chavez said the country is now facing a “horrible trifecta” of rice supply problems with the expected reduction of exports from Thailand and Vietnam.
This is also exacerbated by local farmers’ decision to  discontinue rice farming.
“The grand illusion that there will always be cheap and ample rice on the global market has been shattered. And this confidence was the main argument for the passage of the rice tariffication law last year,” Chavez said.
The law led to the opening up of the market to cheap rice imports which resulted in lower palay farm gate prices in several rice-producing areas.

A growing problem: Nigerian rice farmers fall short after borders close

·       JANUARY 23, 2020 / 1:42 PM

MAKURDI, Nigeria (Reuters) - Thomas Tyavwva Maji is planting rice on more of his land in Nigeria’s Benue State than ever to take advantage of a surge in prices since the country shut its land borders in August.
FILE PHOTO: Farmers are seen threshing harvested rice in Benue, Nigeria December 3, 2019. REUTERS/Afolabi Sotunde
But he says he cannot go much further. With no machinery or irrigation, limited manual labor and no spare cash for fertilizers, the 45-year-old is not expecting any dramatic change in his fortunes. “We work until we get exhausted, manually we get exhausted,” said Maji, as a woman nearby beat hand-harvested stalks on the ground to separate the grains from the chaff.
The constraints Maji faces have bedeviled many rice farmers and millers across Nigeria for years. Despite government measures designed to spur production, farmers in Nigeria get far less from their land than other major rice growers and the West African country is only marginally less reliant on imports.
That’s a problem for a government that wants to grow all of its own food and boost the country’s agriculture, a sector that accounts for nearly a third of gross domestic product in Africa’s biggest economy.
When he came to power in 2015, Nigerian President Muhammadu Buhari pledged to help the nation become self-sufficient in rice – once a luxury but now a staple for millions of Nigerians.
In 2015, Nigeria’s central bank banned the use of its foreign exchange to pay for rice imports and has backed loans of at least 40 billion naira ($130 million) to help small-holders boost output. It also banned rice imports across land borders and kept hefty 70% tariffs on imports coming through ports.
In August last year, Nigeria went a step further and closed its land borders altogether to stamp out smuggling, often from neighboring Benin, with rice being one of the main targets.
(GRAPHIC: Rice Imports from Thailand - here)

Buhari’s spokesman, Garba Shehu, said the measures boosted rice production to 9.2 million tonnes last year from 7.2 million in 2015, making Nigeria more or less self-sufficient, though traders can import rice through ports if they pay the tariffs.
Agricultural data specialist Gro Intelligence, however, put Nigeria’s rice output at 4.9 million tonnes in 2019, up 60% from 2013 but well below local consumption of 7 million tonnes.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture, meanwhile, expects Nigeria’s 2020 rice imports to rise 9% to 2.4 million tonnes, in part due to the high cost of unprocessed Nigerian paddy rice and elevated operating costs at mills.
In Lagos, Nigeria’s biggest city, supermarket shelves remain stocked with a plethora of imported rice brands.
In the markets where most Nigerians buy their food, sacks of Nigerian rice are piled high but imported rice is still available, even though some traders keep the foreign grain under wraps to prevent it being confiscated by customs agents.
(GRAPHIC: Nigerian Rice Production and Consumption - here)

LOW YIELDS
Small-scale farmers such as Maji account for 80% of Nigeria’s rice production with a handful of large companies, such as Coscharis Group, Dangote and Olam, growing the rest, according to the U.N.’s Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO).
In Benue state, virtually every aspect of Maji’s farming manual, from planting to harvesting to leveling out roads to take the crop to market.
It’s a similar story on many Nigerian farms, leaving the average yield per hectare at just over 2 tonnes - half the global average and a fraction of Egypt’s 9.5 tonnes a hectare, according to U.N. data.
(GRAPHIC: Nigeria Lags in Rice Yield - here)
 Experts say there is little hope of improvement without significant investment in irrigation, mechanization, roads and storage. More than 12% of rice is also wasted due to poor roads and inefficient harvesting, milling and storage, consultants KPMG said in a review of the Nigeria’s rice industry.
In a good year, Maji makes about 1.5 million naira ($4,900) – nowhere close to the 5 million, at least, a tractor would cost. Without irrigation, a goal so remote he doesn’t even know the cost, he can only plant one crop a year.
“At this scale, we will not even be able to fetch a tractor. Talk less of fertilizer and other chemicals,” Maji said.
According to the FAO, less than 1% of Nigeria’s farmland is irrigated, compared with a global average of more than 20%.
Small- and medium-scale rice millers, who account for more than 80 percent of the local market, also say they’re struggling to meet increased demand without proper equipment.
At Wurukum Rice Mill in Makurdi, Iveren Asan works alongside her sister, using a loud diesel-powered generator to drive machinery processing paddy grains into consumable rice.
Nearby, rice grains that have been parboiled in vats heated by firewood dry on tarps. She said new buyers from across the country had surfaced since the border closures - but producing more would require significant investment in new machines and the higher prices were not enough on their own.
“We can’t meet the demand. We are doing the process manually, so we cannot meet the demand,” she said.
(GRAPHIC: Nigeria's Incoming Foreign Direct Investment Slides - here)

Slideshow (20 Images)
‘INCREDIBLY DISRUPTIVE’
More broadly, experts warned that extreme measures, such as border closures, taken in the name of food security were hurting Nigerians, stunting the development of other industries and holding back foreign investment.
“The border closure has been incredibly disruptive,” said John Ashbourne, an economist at Capital Economics. “It stops industries from getting the imports they need, and it pushes up prices.”
The border closure is set for review Jan. 31 but the presidency’s Shehu said land frontiers would remain shut until Nigeria’s neighbors stopped smuggling on their side - and there was “no sign of compliance yet”.
Ashbourne said even some farming has taken a hit from government policies.
After glass was added to a central bank list of items importers cannot buy with foreign exchange, some tomato paste plants shut because they couldn’t source the jars they needed.
On another farm in Benue State, Abraham Hon, 51, weaves through rows of melons and corn before reaching his rice, the crop that generates the most money.
“The prices look pretty good,” he said, as men cut stalks of rice by hand and laid them in piles on the ground. “We expect more money in the pocket this year.”
But while he and Asan are happy with their increased income, they worry about the impact of higher prices on consumers.
A 50 kg bag of rice can cost as much as 24,000 naira in Lagos - nearly double the price in July before the borders were shut and not far below the monthly minimum wage of 30,000 naira.
And consumers, who already spend more than half their income on food according to the World Bank, are feeling the squeeze.
“We will reach a point where people who are buying rice can’t afford to buy rice. They will look at other alternatives to get energy and get food on their table,” Hon said.
“That in the long term is not in the interest of we, the farmers.”
(GRAPHIC: Border Closure Boosts Nigeria's Inflation - here)

Editing by David Clarke

Curing trade deficits requires holistic economic rebalancing

In December last year, BOI Executive Director Ma. Corazon Dichosa called the attention of the nation on an “alarming” development – Philippine trade deficit has been growing.  In 2014-2018,  the deficit averaged 76.54 percent and reached $47 billion in 2018 alone. In simple language, the country is a net importer of goods. The good Director warned that such a pattern of development is simply unsustainable.
It is. No country can be a net importer all the time. And yet, economists keep repeating, the Philippines’ annual growth has been fuelled largely by consumption. How is this possible? We keep consuming without producing the goods needed by the country? The puzzle is solved by the 10 million plus national heroes and heroines – the overseas Filipino workers (OFWs), who have been remitting over $35 billion a year, in pure cash. These remittances have been supplemented by the country’s earnings from the call center-BPO sector and from the annual borrowings arranged by the finance officials.
The problem is that we live in an increasingly volatile and unpredictable world.  There is an eerie calm in the Middle East after the weak Iranian response to the American killing of General Qassem Soleimani. But foreign analysts expect more conflagration in the Gulf Area, a conflagration that might result in a mass return migration for some  three million OFWs.  There is also rising xenophobia in many migration destination countries.
The other economic savior of the Philippines, call center-BPO sector, is also being buffeted by the rapid advances in technology such as the rise of the chat-bots and automated do-it-yourself gadgets. Growth in the sector has been in a plateau since 2017. More and more countries such as Vietnam are also participating in the global service offshoring industry, giving India and the Philippines stiffer competition. 
The point is that one cannot be complacent in the face of the threats facing the country’s two major life savers.  This is indeed the time for an honest-to-goodness reassessment of economic policy directions and institute measures to promote a more balanced economic structure.  In this regard, the BOI mentioned two major policy targets:
One, balancing trade with the major sources of imports: China, South Korea, Indonesia, and Thailand.  We agree. As we have argued in the past, the best economic assistance that China can offer to the Philippines is a balancing of its trade relations with the latter. China accounts for one-third of  the total trade deficit. China is also one reason for the collapse of a number of Philippine industries, from the 1980s onward. Think of the Filipino shoe, plastic and various light industries.
China, as a reliable economic partner, has also been questioned by many Filipinos. China’s loan and investment contracts in relation to a number of power, water and infrastructure projects have been denounced as onerous and one-sided.  China also responded to the Philippines’ new policy of greater economic openness to its neighbor by exporting Chinese construction materials for the country’s build-build-build program, such as steel and sending tens of thousands of Chinese workers and managers to Metro Manila and select provinces as “pogo” workers. No real balancing with China.  
The other declared goal of the BOI is “robust industrialization policy”, which means enhancing the country’s capacity to export more and import less.  In support of this, the BOI is suggesting increased Philippine participation in the global value chains (GVCs), deeper engagement in the emerging fair trade agreements (FTAs) such as the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), and imposition of remedies such as higher tariffs on certain products being dumped by certain exporting countries such as Vietnam.
We fully agree with the need for “robust” industrialization policy.  But robustness cannot happen by simply increasing Philippine participation in the GVCs and in the emerging FTAs.  Factory Asia, led by China and enabled by the system of GVCs developed by the multinationals (MNCs), is now in crisis due to advances in automation and robotization (reducing incentives for the  outsourcing of labor-intensive processes) and the rise of industrial protectionism (as mirrored in Trump’s America First). Also, unlike South Korea and Malaysia, the Philippines has been trapped in the low and middle levels of the GVC system because of its poor industrial base and absence/neglect of “Industrial Policy” in the past; on the other hand, it is increasingly unable to compete with new but low-cost participants in the GVC system such as Cambodia.  
And why are there no Philippine-initiated GVCs that can conquer both the domestic and export markets? The point is that there is limited opportunity in the GVC system that is fracturing due to the factors mentioned above. The BOI’s industrial visioning energy is better spent on the development of industries with higher growth potentials, such as industries to meet the basic needs of 110 million Filipino consumers and those that can support the build-build-build program (for example, revival of the integrated steel industry in Mindanao).  In the case of the build-build-build program, it is ironic that Phinma, once upon a time a leader in organizing basic industries in the 1960s-1970s such as the cement industry, is now doing large-scale importation of Vietnamese cement for the government’s build-build-build program.  
Also, there is a proposal of the Philippine Navy for the government takeover of the bankrupt Hanjin shipyard and its transformation into a Philippine ship-building industry catering to the needs of the Navy and the Philippine shipping industry. What is the BOI’s stand on this?
As to the application of tariff remedies on imported goods, why have the government’s economic managers opposed the proposal of the  farmer organizations for trade remedies against the surge of rice imports last year?  These imports, estimated to be around three million tons, made the Philippines the world’s leading rice importer once more, per data surveillance by the US Department of Agriculture.  These imports also made the lives of millions of Filipino palay farmers miserable, as palay prices went down to as low as P7 to P11 a kilo in various provinces, way below the production cost of P12 a kilo.
Clearly, a more holistic re-assessment of  industrial and agricultural policy options are needed in order to restore industrial “robustness” and attain trade balance for the country. Such a re-assessment should  get out of the old simplistic development paradigm of the EOI neo-liberal economists – export-or-perish paradigm based on labor-intensive (read: low-level) participation in the GVC system of MNCs.  After five decades, the EOI program still has not delivered its  promises: higher industrial development for the country and better welfare for the Filipino people.

RMIT study finds rice is not so nice, exposing children to dangerous arsenic levels

BY FREYA LUCAS
JANUARY 23

new study, conducted by researchers from RMIT has found that rice snacks designed for children, and sold in Australian supermarkets, contain arsenic at levels above European safety guidelines of safe consumption for babies and toddlers. 

The study found Australian children who eat large amounts of rice-based food may be exposed to dangerous amounts of arsenic. Researchers used the European guidelines for their evaluation because Australia does not have safety standards specifically for children.  
Senior researcher Associate Professor Suzie Reichman, an environmental toxicologist said that while all the products tested met Australian guidelines, the guidelines do not reflect the latest scientific understanding on how arsenic affects the body.  
“Children are far more vulnerable to the long-term toxic effect of metals like arsenic, but our rice guidelines are based on adults, and on out-of-date dietary habits, when rice was generally eaten less often by Australian families,” she added.   
The study highlights the need to develop new standards, specifically for children, and to ensure that these guidelines are in line with what we now know about safe rice consumption, Professor Reichman said.  
With an increasing number of children experiencing gluten intolerance, rice-based products are a popular alternative, and Professor Reichman said that while rice “can be safely eaten as part of a well-rounded, balanced diet, but if it’s a child’s main source of carbohydrates, that could be a problem.”  
“As a general rule, we recommend that children under five eat rice in moderation and parents should avoid serving rice at every meal, to minimise the risk of exposure to arsenic.” 
 Arsenic is a naturally occurring metal widely found in air, soil and groundwater that comes in both organic and inorganic forms.Organic arsenic is relatively safe, but inorganic arsenic is a carcinogen linked with cancers of the bladder and skin. Long-term exposure to high amounts of inorganic arsenic is dangerous to human health.  
The Australian rice guidelines are for total arsenic (organic and inorganic) and set a maximum level of 1mg/kg. This is more than 3 times higher than the standard for total arsenic set by the World Health Organisation of 0.3mg/kg.   
Rather than looking at total arsenic, the European Union guideline for infants and young children focuses specifically on inorganic arsenic and sets a maximum level of 0.1mg/kg.  
 Almost 40 common products consumed by babies and toddlers were tested as part of the research, including milk formula powder, cereal, crackers and pasta made from brown, white, organic and non-organic rice.

The research found 75 per cent of the products had levels of inorganic arsenic above the EU standard for children. Inorganic arsenic was found in higher levels in brown rice products, likely because arsenic is more concentrated in the rice bran that is removed in white rice.   
Professor Reichman said the results for brown rice were particularly concerning because it is generally seen by health-conscious parents as a better choice, due to its higher fibre and nutrient contents.  
The research was part of a final-year capstone project by Bachelor of Environmental Engineering student, Zhuyun Gu, who is now undertaking a PhD at RMIT, and was “of such high standard that it was accepted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and highlighted in its special edition focusing on arsenic exposure in the environment and human health,” Professor Reichman said.   
“This work is an important contribution to our understanding of safety issues around rice in our diets, and supports the need for updating arsenic guidelines in Australia.  
 “It’s a fantastic example of how our students can shape the world by looking at practical problems and searching for real solutions.”   

Despite less ozone pollution, not all plants benefit

Date:January 22, 2020
Source:Florida State University
Summary:
Policies and new technologies have reduced emissions of precursor gases that lead to ozone air pollution, but despite those improvements, the amount of ozone that plants are taking in has not followed the same trend, according to researchers.

Breathe easy: Concentrations of ozone in the air have decreased over large parts of the country in the past several decades.
But not too easy.
Policies and new technologies have reduced emissions of precursor gases that lead to ozone air pollution, but despite those improvements, the amount of ozone that plants are taking in has not followed the same trend, according to Florida State University researchers. Their findings are published in the journal Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene.
"Past studies of plant damage from ozone have been overly optimistic about what the improving ozone air quality means for vegetation health," said Christopher Holmes, the Werner A. and Shirley B. Baum assistant professor of meteorology in the Department of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Science.
Ozone is a gas made of three oxygen molecules. In the upper levels of the atmosphere, it is helpful for life on Earth because it keeps too much ultraviolet radiation from reaching the planet's surface. But when it's found at ground level, ozone is a pollutant that can damage the lungs. It's also toxic for plants, and present-day levels of the pollutant have cut global grain yields by up to 15 percent, resulting in global losses of soybean, wheat, rice and maize valued at $10 billion to $25 billion annually.
The falling levels of ozone pollution are good news for human health, but FSU researchers wanted to know if plants were seeing benefits too. To answer this question, Allison Ronan, a former graduate student, and Jason Ducker, a postdoctoral researcher at FSU, worked with Holmes and another researcher to track the amount of ozone plants sucked up through pores on their leaves over 10 years at more than 30 test sites. They compared those trends to measurements of atmospheric ozone.
As they expected, the ozone concentrations in the air decreased at most of their study sites, but, surprisingly, the ozone uptake into plants at the sites didn't necessarily go down at the same time. In fact, at many sites, atmospheric ozone concentrations fell while the ozone uptake into plants rose.
The different trends happen because plants can open and close the stomata pores on their leaves in response to weather, especially light, temperature, moisture, drought and other environmental conditions. If the stomata close, the plants cease taking up ozone, regardless of the concentration in the surrounding air. That means the ozone uptake into leaves doesn't exactly track the amount of ozone in the air. The FSU scientists found that these environmental factors have more impact on the ozone dose the plants receive than the amount of ozone in the atmosphere.
"We know that weather and growing conditions vary a lot from year to year, and that variability in weather turns out to be more important for driving the trends and variability in ozone uptake into plants than the concentrations in the surrounding air," Holmes said. "With decreasing ozone concentrations, we're moving in the right direction, but the benefits for crops and vegetation may not be apparent until the air quality improvements have persisted longer."
The FSU team identified the differing trends by using a dataset developed by Holmes' research group. The dataset, called SynFlux, fuses measurements from air quality networks with data from field sites that monitor energy flows between vegetation and the atmosphere. It enabled the team to study ozone uptake trends at many more sites than has previously been possible.
Future studies of plant damage and accompanying economic losses need to avoid relying primarily on measures of ozone concentration in the atmosphere and look at ozone uptake instead, researchers said.
"With the SynFlux dataset that we have developed, we've now got the information to do that on a large scale at many sites across multiple continents," Holmes said. "We're just scratching the surface of what we can learn about air pollution impacts on vegetation using this tool."
Jordan L. Schnell at Northwestern University contributed to this research. This work was supported by the Winchester Fund at Florida State University, NASA and the National Science Foundation.


Story Source:
Materials provided by Florida State University. Original written by Bill Wellock. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.


Journal Reference:
1.     Allison C. Ronan, Jason A. Ducker, Jordan L. Schnell, Christopher Holmes. Have improvements in ozone air quality reduced ozone uptake into plants? Elem Sci Anth, 2020; 8 (1): 2 DOI: 10.1525/elementa.399


Cite This Page:
Florida State University. "Despite less ozone pollution, not all plants benefit." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 22 January 2020. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/01/200122154336.htm>.

A heart-healthy protein from bran of cereal crop

Date:January 22, 2020
Source:American Chemical Society
Summary:Foxtail millet is an annual grass grown widely as a cereal crop in parts of India, China and Southeast Asia. Milling the grain removes the hard outer layer, or bran, from the rest of the seed. Now, researchers have identified a protein in this bran that can help stave off atherosclerosis in mice genetically prone to the disease.
Share:
    
FULL STORY


Foxtail millet is an annual grass grown widely as a cereal crop in parts of India, China and Southeast Asia. Milling the grain removes the hard outer layer, or bran, from the rest of the seed. Now, researchers have identified a protein in this bran that can help stave off atherosclerosis in mice genetically prone to the disease. They report their results in ACS' Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry.
Atherosclerosis, or narrowing of the arteries because of plaque buildup, is the leading cause of heart disease and stroke. Plaques form when immune cells called monocytes take up oxidized low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (ox-LDL) in the artery wall. These cells then secrete pro-inflammatory cytokines, causing aortic smooth muscle cells to migrate to the site. Eventually, a plaque made up of cholesterol, cells and other substances forms. Drugs called statins can treat atherosclerosis by lowering LDL levels, but some people suffer from side effects. Zhuoyu Li and colleagues previously identified a protein in foxtail millet bran that inhibits the migration of colon cancer cells. They wondered if the protein, called foxtail millet bran peroxidase (FMBP), could also help prevent atherosclerosis.
To find out, the researchers treated human aortic smooth muscle cells and monocytes in petri dishes with FMBP. The millet protein reduced the uptake of lipids by both cell types and reduced the migration of smooth muscle cells. In monocytes, FMBP treatment blocked the expression of two key proteins involved in atherosclerosis. Next, the team fed mice that were genetically predisposed to atherosclerosis a high-fat diet. Mice that were then treated with either FMBP or a statin had far fewer plaques than untreated mice. The FMBP-treated mice also had elevated blood levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL), the "good cholesterol." Based on these results, FMBP is a natural product with great potential in the prevention and treatment of atherosclerosis, the researchers say.


Story Source:
Materials provided by American Chemical SocietyNote: Content may be edited for style and length.


Journal Reference:
1.     Fengming Liu, Shuhua Shan, Hanqing Li, Zhuoyu Li. Treatment of Peroxidase Derived from Foxtail Millet Bran Attenuates Atherosclerosis by Inhibition of CD36 and STAT3 in Vitro and in VivoJournal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2020; DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.9b06963


Cite This Page:
American Chemical Society. "A heart-healthy protein from bran of cereal crop." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 22 January 2020. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/01/200122080604.htm>.

We must sustain local rice consumption

The sudden development of taste for locally produced rice among Ghanaians is a healthy sign for local farmers and those in the rice value chain. This is particularly so when, in the recent past, locally produced rice never had space in the rice demand equation in a country where emphasis was placed on imported rice.

Ghanaians never had faith in locally produced rice because it was seen as inferior to its preferred foreign counterpart, which enjoyed monopoly until now.

That situation led to financial institutions shying away from supporting the local rice value chain operators, thereby constraining local operators from operating at full capacity because of lack of funds.

The situation got the point where the Minister of Food and Agriculture (MoFA), Dr Owusu Afriyie Akoto, had to intervene and set up a Rice Technical Team, made up of the MoFA, the Ministry of Finance, rice importers, rice processors and rice millers, to discuss the way forward to ending the importation of rice and making the country attain rice sufficiency by 2022.

The Daily Graphic lauds the initiative to set up the Rice Technical Team, which has the potential to save the millions of dollars used to import rice from outside.

This surely resonates with the Presidents Ghana Beyond Aid agenda and must be pursued vigorously to achieve rice sufficiency in the country. We believe this is doable.

For instance, in 2017, out of the 1,089,000 metric tonnes (MT) of rice consumed in the country, only 433,000MT was produced locally and we had to import about 656,000MT to be able to meet the national demand.

In 2018, out of over 1.12million metric tonnes of national demand, only 456,000MT was produced locally, leaving an excess of about 665,670MT to be supplied from importation.

But the story changed in 2019 when MoFA stepped in to provide subsided improved seeds and fertilizer for rice farmers.

Following the intervention, the quantity of locally produced rice jumped to 784,875MT, leaving a deficit of just 370,445MT.

It is projected that by 2021, locally produced rice will exceed one million metric tonnes and we will be required to top up with only 47,554MT in order to meet the national rice demand, while in 2022 we will need to import only 3,073MT to meet the national demand for rice.

Indeed, the MoFA has projected that by 2023 Ghana would have met its rice demand, with an excess of 365,302MT for export. As a nation, we must continue taking steps to promote the consumption of local rice to put money in the pockets of our hardworking farmers. What we have forgotten is that the more rice we import, the richer foreign farmers become, while our own rice farmers become poorer.

The Daily Graphic, therefore, urges both the MoFA and the Ministry of Finance to support rice farmers to be able to secure funding from financial institutions to be able to increase their production and also for the milers to be able to increase their production and also for the millers to be able to off-take paddy rice at the farms.

The claim by local rice millers that they could not meet the market demand for locally milled rice during the Yuletide should be worrying news to those who believe in Ghana.

We know for a fact that the local millers could not meet the market demand not because there was no paddy rice mill but that the millers did not have enough funds to off-take all the paddy rice from farmers.

We believe that this is the time to resource rice millers with funding facilities to enable them to mill all the rice produced locally. The MoFA and the Ministry of Finance should serve as collateral for farmers to assess funding from the financial institutions which demand collateral and other facilities before giving out loans to these farmers.

This is the time to sustain the interest in local rice and the onus is on MoFA and the Ministry of Finance to support the farmers and those in the rice value chain to keep up the momentum.

This is the only way we can realise the President’s Ghana Beyond Aid agenda.
PM reiterates fair price of crops
 BSS
·       Published at 12:29 am January 23rd, 2020

Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina speaks at the parliament on Wednesday, January 22, 2020 PID

The premier said food grains were being collected every year from internal sources aiming to ensure the fair price of crops the farmers produce
Prime Minister and Leader of the House Sheikh Hasina on Wednesday reiterated her government’s commitment to ensuring fair price of crops and other agricultural products in the interest of the farmers.
“The farmers-friendly Awami League government has taken various initiatives to ensure fair price of crops produced by the farmers and it will continue these programmes in the future,” she told the House while replying to a starred question placed by treasury bench member Md Shahiduzzaman Sarkar (Naogaon-2).
To ensure the fair price of food grains, the prime minister said, the Food Planning and Monitoring Committee of the government fixed the prices of food grains (rice, paddy and wheat) with 10-15 percent profit on production cost, considering the interest of farmers.
To this end, she said, the government in 2019 decided to procure wheat per kg at Tk28, while Boro and Aman paddy per kg at Tk26, boiled rice per kg at Tk36 and non-boiled rice per kg at Tk35.
The Leader of the House said the government set a target of procuring 4.11 lakh tons of rice and about 4 lakh tons of paddy during the last Boro season, while it collected around 15.5 lakh tons of food grains, including 4 lakh MT of paddy and about 10 lakh MT of boiled rice against the target.
Sheikh Hasina said the present government took an initiative, for the first time, to procure Aman paddy directly from the farmers.
“We’ve planned to procure 6,26,991 tons of Aman paddy directly from peasants fixing the price of paddy at Tk 1,040 per maund and 3,84,702 tonnes of rice from the millers,” she said.
The premier said food grains were being collected every year from internal sources aiming to ensure the fair price of crops the farmers produce. 
She said the government took an initiative to set up 200 silos across the country with the capacity of 5,000 tons each to store paddy directly collected from the farmers.
“Another initiative has been taken to build seven modern rice mills with drying facility of paddy,” she added. 
Sheikh Hasina said the government planned to set up storages in different parts of the country aiming to preserve and process vegetables. 
A “Farmers’ Market” has already been established at ‘Sech Bhaban’ beside the city’s Manik Mia Avenue to ensure fair price of agri products , she said, adding the market remained open on Friday and Saturday.
Besides, the Leader of the House said, the government was now setting up 30 more farmers’ markets in different parts of the country.
A total of 18 assemble centres were set up in the country’s northwestern and southern regions for proper marketing of crops and other agricultural products, she added.
Exporting organic, importing bukbok rice and critical engagement
Jan. 23, 2020 LEO XL Y. FUENTES, JR.
The recent program of the Mindanao Development Authority (MinDa) through its so-called Mindanao Organic Rice Council exposes the outright bankruptcy of this government in terms of rice sufficiency.
Late last year, MinDa chief and former agriculture secretary Manny Pinol, proudly shared this program as a support mechanism on the impacts of rice liberalization law. Earlier this week, MinDa is finalizing the trial shipment of around 500 bags of organic rice to the US.
This move by the government is a confirmation of the neo-liberal agricultural economy dominant to Philippine society, an affirmation to its export-oriented and import-dependent orientation.
It is crazy in so many levels, sending our prime organic rice to other parts of the world, while we import and eat the bukbok rice (weevil-infested rice), which former Agri Secretary Piñol shamelessly taught us how to cook.
On a more serious note, exporting organic rice will not solve the problems brought by Rice Liberalization Law (RLL) which this government ratified last year. Our rice industry already incurred, at least P100 Billion losses as of last year, affecting at least 2.5 million Filipino rice farmers. RLL also resulted to the closure of at least 4,000 rice mills nationwide affecting the livelihood of rice millers, operators and laborers.
While some grouplet representing the civil-society organizations (CSOs) of this so-called Mindanao Organic Rice Council claim that they are in “critical engagement” with the government, the truth is that they are uncritical at all. The truth is that they are in cahoots with this government in making shallow programs as they veer away with the devastation brought by rice liberalization to Filipino rice farmers.
The critical way to engage this administration is to become critical in these superficial and PR-circus type of programs. To critically engage this government is to stand against the dominant export-oriented and import-dependent agricultural economy. To stand for the repeal of Rice Liberalization Law and to stand for the interest of Filipino farmers. That is critical engagement!
While we agree on the promotion of organic rice, we must also carefully draw the line that is grounded on basic tenets of sustainable agriculture- we give premium to local food sufficiency. As we in MASIPAG describe it – PEOPLE FIRST BEFORE PROFIT!
Cattle Destroy N17m Rice Farm In Enugu
 January 23, 2020
V

Over N17 million worth of rice farmland has been destroyed by grazing activities of cattle in Oji-Agu axis in Akpugo community in Nkanu East Local Government Area of Enugu State.
Briefing newsmen on the massive destruction of the rich farmland in Enugu yesterday, Mr Ekene Uzodinma, the Manager of Excellent Integrated Farms Ltd., said that herds of cattle had eaten up over eight hectares of farmland that the company cultivated.
Uzodinma lamented that the herds also devoured some heaps of unprocessed paddy rice kept in the farmland, which was waiting to be sent to the milling machine.
“From the market value of local rice now, the eight hectares should produce at least 80 tonnes of rice as a finished product and it is nothing less than N17 million in evaluation,’’ he said.
“Presently, my workers, other farms and villagers are afraid to go to the farms again due to the unrelenting activities of the herds; while the herdsmen are threatening to brutally deal with anybody stopping their cattle from grazing.
“Initially, we tried our best to wade them off, especially during the rainy season and the swampy nature of the rice farm also kept the herdsmen and their herds away.
“However, when we started harvesting and the dry season rolled in; in early December, we were constantly chasing them away until December 15; when they started coming into the rice farmland during the late evening and night hours.

Soc Trang agricultural engineer and huge love for Vietnamese fragrant rice

Wednesday, 2020-01-22 13:05:55


Engineer Ho Quang Cua and the world's best rice coded ST25. (Photo: Huu Duc)

NDO – Hero of Labour, engineer Ho Quang Cua - the "father" of ST25, the fragrant rice variety which was recognised as the World's Best Rice at the Rice Trader World Rice Conference Philippines 2019 - has expressed his huge love for Vietnamese rice.
Dedicating to fragrant rice
One day nearing the end of the year, engineer Ho Quang Cua was chatting with his visitors at his sweet tamarind garden in My Xuyen Town, My Xuyen District, Soc Trang Province, next to the eight-hectare rice breeding field he hired from local people nearby to breed fragrant rice varieties. This is the iconic "rendezvous" point for many domestic and foreign scientists who show their interest in seeding rice.
Unable to hide his passion for rice breeding, he immediately started his story. “More than 20 years ago, when Thailand announced that it had bred two non-photosensitive fragrant rice varieties, which they called "golden seeds", I thought about it lot. If they can do it, why can’t we? That question kept going back and forth in my head without a pause. I started to imagine about a fragrant rice variety for Vietnam." And at the beginning of the 21st century, his Soc Trang fragrant rice research group was formed, which still exists today.
The hybridisation of his aromatic rice hybrid group was conducted after they collected enough parent breeds on the basis of crossbreeding, selecting and reviewing to form new hybrid combinations. Parent breeds were collected from Taiwan (China), Bangladesh, Thailand, the International Rice Research Institute and Vietnam’s northern and southern provinces.
“Complex combinations including many parents. In 2001, I formed the fragrant rice variety coded ST3 and in the following year, it was recognised by the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development as part of the national rice variety system. In 2005, ST5 aromatic salt-tolerant rice was introduced into the rice-shrimp farming area in Ca Mau Peninsula, U Minh Thuong and U Minh Ha, signalling the start of a "recovering" period for the rice-growing areas, after farmers here had focused so much on shrimp farming while abandoning rice cultivation for many years,” Cua said.
In 2007, the ST Red breed was born, followed by the ST Violet in 2010, which were the first step to initiate the macrobiotic therapy. In 2009, the ST20 fragrant rice variety was successfully bred, once again playing a pioneering role for a breakthrough period of Vietnam's jasmine rice price, with export prices ranging from US$700-900 per tonne. At that time, ST20 also took the lead in prices in all Vietnam’s southwestern rice baskets, with VND20,000 a kg, surpassing all small aromatic rice imported from Cambodia and Thailand through unofficial channels.
Later on, when he got to grips with the limitations of the ST20 variety that has a high yield but is unstable in coping with unstable weather conditions, Cua and Dr. Tran Tan Phuong spared no efforts to create new ST20 fragrant rice variety, with a cultivation period of 100-105 days that can be planted anywhere in the Mekong Delta, despite various hydrological regimes.
Then from 2008, two new hybrid combinations were formed by the group, namely ST24 and ST25, and they were finalised in 2016 after stable pilots. In 2017, ST24 rice won the first prize in a rice contest held in Soc Trang, and by the end of that year, ST24 was honoured to be in the Top 3 of the World's Best Rice at the 9th The Rice Trader World Rice Conference held in Macau (China). In 2019, like ST24, ST25 was selected by the Vietnam Food Association to compete in the 11th The Rice Trader World Rice Conference in the Philippines. Both of them were among the world top rice varieties and the judges awarded ST25 first prize. ST24 and ST25 rice both belong to the ST aromatic rice line with many different varieties.
Vietnam’s ST25 rice honoured as best in the world at the Rice Trader World Rice Conference 2019. (Photo: VNA)
Imbued with original features
In nearly 20 years on long road researching fragrant rice with a persistent love for Vietnamese rice, Cua and his teammates’ success in being granted the world's best rice for ST25 has undergone an arduous journey. "It was a really difficult period for our team," Cua stopped for a moment, then contemplated: "We succeeded in breeding an aromatic rice variety but putting it into mass production was still a problem. Because it was too new, how to get the public have confidence in it? So there had to be additional funding for seed promotion. Since we had limited funding from our own money and a lack of investment, we were running out of money and were failing. For nearly ten years, the loan amounted to reach over VND1 billion. Ten years ago, it was a great fortune. But, fortunately, after all these troubles, each fragrant rice variety was continuously born and successfully piloted in the fields.”
Recalling his old days with so much sweat and tears pouring into the rice, Cua now expresses his pride when talking about ST25 born in his hometown. He said: “Soc Trang is not only a leading geographical indication of Vietnamese fragrant rice but has long been known to many foreign rice traders. Soc Trang’s rice was recorded more than 100 years ago, with Bai Xao rice [named after a well-known destination in Soc Trang], together with Go Cong rice, were famous in Hong Kong (China) – a transit destination to export rice to Europe.” Perhaps that is why ST25 rice won the world's best rice award not only for its typical characteristics and attractive sweet aroma, but also for being imbued with the special features of Soc Trang soil, as well as inheriting the qualities from ancient rice varieties in the Mekong Delta.
A whole life dedicating to rice grains, engineer Ho Quang Cua expressed his wish: “When I won the title for the best rice in the world, I wish ST25 to always retain the quality of being delicious rice. To do so, rice farmers as well as rice processing and exporting enterprises should join hands to preserve its quality. Let’s cultivate rice with your heart, and also the same in rice trading, too. We must always ensure quality of rice to consumers across the country and the world to build a sustainable trust among them for ST25.”
The prosperity of the rice production industry and the rice growers begins with such love and belief!
Editor-in-Chief: THUAN HUU
Head Office: 71 Hang Trong Street - Hanoi
Tel: (84-24) 3 825 4231/3 825 4232 - Ext: 227
Fax: (84-24) 3 825 5593/3 828 9432
E-mail:
nhandanonline@nhandan.org.vn