December 28, 2016
KARACHI: Federation of Pakistan
Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FPCCI) horticulture exports head Ahmad Jawad
said decreasing exports result in unfavourable balance of payments, pressure on
the exchange rate, and rupee depreciation, which again increases the imports
bill, creating a vicious cycle.Talking to media, Jawad said the exports of
almost all the countries in South Asia were on the rise. “Unfortunately, with
Pakistan, it is the opposite case.” In the fiscal year 2015-16, Pakistan’s
exports witnessed a 12 percent decrease from $23.6 billion to $20.8 billion.
This is an awkward and embarrassing situation for Pakistan, given the fact that
we had been awarded the GSP Plus status by the European Union to help boost our
exports.According to the economic survey of Pakistan 2014–15, the country’s
exports remained stagnant at $24–25 billion (and it actually decreased in the
year 2016), while Bangladesh’s exports surpassed the $30 billion mark last
year, and are set to hit the $34 billion mark this year.
The reason for decreasing
Pakistani exports is the sluggish growth in the Islamabad’s major trading
partners - UK, US, and China, high cost of production due to electricity
shortfall, and delays in order deliveries because of non-availability of energy
inputs.Among Pakistan’s major exports, rice, cotton, leather, jewelry and the
chemical sector have been hit hard by the slump in exports. Given the current
scenario of Pakistan’s dwindling exports, a strategy for bolstering them
becomes imperative, Jawad said.
One of the primary ways of
enhancing exports is to support entrepreneurship and to create new avenues for
growth by guiding the youth. "We should identify other export
opportunities from Pakistan and inform the investors and the public about them
so that more people can take part in the value creation process. Similarly,
there are many other opportunities available in the supply chain of many
finished products like in the untapped horticulture sector, which is constantly
ignored."
Jawad mentioned the example of
Bangladesh, which imports cotton from other countries, but was now the fifth
largest textile exporter in the world owing to its value-added textile exports.
In Pakistan, data shows that the export of cotton yarn has been down by 32
percent, but the export of readymade garments has improved by around 4.2
percent in the current fiscal year. This speaks volumnes about the importance
of value-addition.
“Similarly, in the meat and dairy
sector, we can export frozen meat products, powdered milk, cheese and other
value-added creative products instead of exporting raw products,” he said.
FPCCI panel chief also said
Philippines, which has half the population of Pakistan, has roughly $25 billion
of exports in the global outsourcing industry (part of the service sector),
even Dubai earned $36.4 via tourism in 2015. “Pakistan’s workforce is also
skilled and it can become a major player in the global outsourcing industry if
given proper attention by the government,” he added.
The tourism potential is also
great here for both adventure seekers and history enthusiasts. “We have got
some breath taking scenery, palatable food, and a wonderful cultural history
for the global tourists,” the FPCCI chief added.Jawad urged the government to
take a more liberal view of the situation, and develop a multipronged strategy
towards the promotion of exports.
https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/174862-Govt-urged-for-holistic-approach-to-promote-exports
Vietnam earns 2.2 billion USD from rice export
this year
Hanoi (VNA) – Vietnam exported an estimated
4.88 million tonnes of rice this year, earning 2.2 billion USD, down 25.8
percent in volume and 21.2 percent in value year-on-year, according to the
Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development.
In December alone, 399,000 tonnes of rice worth 181 million USD were shipped abroad. China remains the largest rice importer of Vietnam with a market share of 35.9 percent. In the past 11 months, Vietnam shipped 1.61 million tonnes worth 722.2 million USD to the country, down 20.5 percent in volume and 11.7 percent in value from 2015. Ghana is Vietnam’s second largest rice importer with an 11.1 percent market share.
Markets with strong drops in Vietnamese rice imports are the Philippines (down 65 percent), Malaysia (48 percent), the US (33 percent), Singapore (30.7 percent), Indonesia (22 percent), the Ivory Coast (21.5 percent), and Hong Kong (19 percent). The falling rice export is attributable to prolonging El Nino phenomenon in the central and Central Highlands, saline intrusion in the Mekong Delta, and flooding in the north, the central and the Central Highlands. Rice production this year decreased in both cultivation area and output, particularly in the south. The total rice output is estimated at 43.6 million tonnes, down 3.3 percent from last year.-VNA
In December alone, 399,000 tonnes of rice worth 181 million USD were shipped abroad. China remains the largest rice importer of Vietnam with a market share of 35.9 percent. In the past 11 months, Vietnam shipped 1.61 million tonnes worth 722.2 million USD to the country, down 20.5 percent in volume and 11.7 percent in value from 2015. Ghana is Vietnam’s second largest rice importer with an 11.1 percent market share.
Markets with strong drops in Vietnamese rice imports are the Philippines (down 65 percent), Malaysia (48 percent), the US (33 percent), Singapore (30.7 percent), Indonesia (22 percent), the Ivory Coast (21.5 percent), and Hong Kong (19 percent). The falling rice export is attributable to prolonging El Nino phenomenon in the central and Central Highlands, saline intrusion in the Mekong Delta, and flooding in the north, the central and the Central Highlands. Rice production this year decreased in both cultivation area and output, particularly in the south. The total rice output is estimated at 43.6 million tonnes, down 3.3 percent from last year.-VNA
http://en.vietnamplus.vn/vietnam-earns-22-billion-usd-from-rice-export-this-year/105032.vnp
RICE PRODUCTION WILL INCREASE IN 2017-
HOLDER
Published December 20, 2016
Minister of Agriculture, Noel Holder
yesterday, during the 2017 Budget debate, told the National
Assembly that rice production is expected to increase by 1.3 percent in
2017.Minister Holder explained that rice production declined during 2016 by
12.7 percent to 600,000 metric tonnes due to El Nino weather conditions.
Minister Holder pointed out that a number of farmers also exited the industry
due to the loss of the high priced Venezuelan market. Minister Holder explained
that 3,311 hectares were lost out of the 76,717 hectares sown.It was reported
that production for 2015 was 1,058,129 tonnes which was equivalent to 687,784
tonnes. That was 80,840 tonnes or 8.27 percent higher than the production of
paddy for 2014.
The research station at Burma
continues to work diligently to improve rice varieties being offered to
farmers, Minister Holder explained.The Agriculture Minister stressed that to
achieve an improved rice variety; the rice industry requires improved
management practices, seeding rates, sowing methods and disease management.Government
is diligently employing various technologies in the effort to reduce the impact
of a severe weather.The government is pursuing diversification to specialty
rice varieties, with increased emphasis on the development of value-added
production such as rice/wheat flour blend, rice noodles, pasta and pre-cooked
rice products for 2017.
http://agriculture.gov.gy/2016/12/20/rice-production-will-increase-in-2017-holder/
Rice imports still under study
after typhoons
Posted on December 28, 2016
THE GOVERNMENT is waiting to
assess the impact of three typhoons on major rice-producing provinces in the
fourth quarter before deciding whether it will resort to rice imports next
year, the National Food Authority (NFA) said.
The NFA said it has a pending
proposal for another 250,000 metric tons of government-to-government rice
imports in the first quarter of 2017, which remains subject to approval.“The
NFA’s recommendation for rice importation is still for evaluation of the NFA
Council,” said Marietta J. Ablaza, spokesperson for the state-run agency, in a
phone interview last week. Among the factors being evaluated
were the impact on production of typhoons Karen and Lawin, which hit the
country in October, and typhoon Nina this week.The importation deal, should it
push through, will be slated under a government-to-government procurement
scheme.
Typhoons Karen and Lawin caused estimated losses of 516,133 MT of palay, or unmilled rice, valued at P11.03 billion, according to the Department of Agriculture’s Nov. 4 damage report. The Philippine Statistics Authority reported that palay output may come in at 17.91 million MT for 2016, lower than the 2015 total of 18.15 million MT, after a prolonged dry spell reduced the area harvested this year.In a statement released over the weekend, the NFA, however, assured that rice stocks are sufficient in typhoon Nina-affected areas with the agency’s release of more than 10,000 50-kilo bags for distribution to typhoon victims.
The National Economic and Development Authority’s (NEDA) director for agriculture, natural resources and environment, Mercedita A. Sombilla, who chairs the NFA Council, said that the domestic supply and demand situation of rice will still have to be assessed some time in January. Even in light of the recent typhoon, Ms. Sombilla said that the government sees no urgent need for the Philippines, one of the world’s top rice importers, to open up orders for imports.
“We are still assessing damage to agri. I would think (it is) not necessary since all rice planted are supposed to be harvested now,” Ms. Sombilla, also a NEDA Assistant Secretary, said in a text message on Tuesday.On Monday, the typhoon cut through southern Luzon and the eastern Visayas, according to the Philippine Atmospheric, Geophysical and Astronomical Services Administration, the weather bureau also known as PAGASA.
The country has 250,000 metric tons remaining from a standby authority to import 500,000 MT approved by the previous government. As of Nov. 1, rice stocks stood at 3.30 million MT, sufficient for 97 days of consumption.
The initial 250,000 MT standby authority was awarded to the world’s top rice exporters on Aug. 31 -- with Thailand and Vietnam winning 100,000 MT and 150,000 MT, respectively, under the government-to-government import scheme. In addition, the NFA in September opened up to private traders the importation of an additional 805,200 metric tons of rice under the minimum access volume (MAV) scheme.
The MAV rice importation program allows private traders to apply for the delivery of 293,100 MT each from Thailand and Vietnam. Under the omnibus origin scheme, importers can also buy up to 50,000 MT each from China, top suppliers India and Pakistan, up to 15,000 MT from Australia, up to 4,000 MT from El Salvador, and 50,000 MT from any other country.In its list of applicants posted Dec. 21 on its Web site, the NFA has so far authorized shipments totaling 641,080 tons from Thailand, Vietnam, Pakistan, and India.All rice under the MAV importation scheme is expected to arrive in the country not later than Feb. 28 next year and is subject to a 35% tariff. -- Janina C. Lim
Typhoons Karen and Lawin caused estimated losses of 516,133 MT of palay, or unmilled rice, valued at P11.03 billion, according to the Department of Agriculture’s Nov. 4 damage report. The Philippine Statistics Authority reported that palay output may come in at 17.91 million MT for 2016, lower than the 2015 total of 18.15 million MT, after a prolonged dry spell reduced the area harvested this year.In a statement released over the weekend, the NFA, however, assured that rice stocks are sufficient in typhoon Nina-affected areas with the agency’s release of more than 10,000 50-kilo bags for distribution to typhoon victims.
The National Economic and Development Authority’s (NEDA) director for agriculture, natural resources and environment, Mercedita A. Sombilla, who chairs the NFA Council, said that the domestic supply and demand situation of rice will still have to be assessed some time in January. Even in light of the recent typhoon, Ms. Sombilla said that the government sees no urgent need for the Philippines, one of the world’s top rice importers, to open up orders for imports.
“We are still assessing damage to agri. I would think (it is) not necessary since all rice planted are supposed to be harvested now,” Ms. Sombilla, also a NEDA Assistant Secretary, said in a text message on Tuesday.On Monday, the typhoon cut through southern Luzon and the eastern Visayas, according to the Philippine Atmospheric, Geophysical and Astronomical Services Administration, the weather bureau also known as PAGASA.
The country has 250,000 metric tons remaining from a standby authority to import 500,000 MT approved by the previous government. As of Nov. 1, rice stocks stood at 3.30 million MT, sufficient for 97 days of consumption.
The initial 250,000 MT standby authority was awarded to the world’s top rice exporters on Aug. 31 -- with Thailand and Vietnam winning 100,000 MT and 150,000 MT, respectively, under the government-to-government import scheme. In addition, the NFA in September opened up to private traders the importation of an additional 805,200 metric tons of rice under the minimum access volume (MAV) scheme.
The MAV rice importation program allows private traders to apply for the delivery of 293,100 MT each from Thailand and Vietnam. Under the omnibus origin scheme, importers can also buy up to 50,000 MT each from China, top suppliers India and Pakistan, up to 15,000 MT from Australia, up to 4,000 MT from El Salvador, and 50,000 MT from any other country.In its list of applicants posted Dec. 21 on its Web site, the NFA has so far authorized shipments totaling 641,080 tons from Thailand, Vietnam, Pakistan, and India.All rice under the MAV importation scheme is expected to arrive in the country not later than Feb. 28 next year and is subject to a 35% tariff. -- Janina C. Lim
http://www.bworldonline.com/content.php?section=Economy&title=rice-imports-still-under-study-after-typhoons-&id=138318
Two types of champions coming forward to save our farmers
December 28, 2016, 8:55 pm
I read the exchange between Dr. U. Waidyanatha (UW) and Dr. Kamal
Wickremasinghe in the Island regarding the so-called plight of our farmers.
What is "the plight of farmers" that is being discussed?
Nearly two dozen eminent doctors, agriculturist, chemists etc.,
appealed to the President against the ban on Glyphosate, a popular weed killer.
Today, the farmer's herbicide has been banned, and his fertilizer has been cut
by legislators who follow a vociferous majoritarian public opinion (MPO) with a
fear of agrochemicals; alternative "organic" fertilizers or
herbicides are not available; the farmer cannot sell his paddy because the MPO
says that the rice is "full of toxins" like arsenic, cadmium and
glyphosate while the mainstream scientists say, "no, your rice is good and
safe"; (the weed killer said to cause kidney disease is banned, but the
farmers are still falling ill; the weeds grow and the farmer has no extra
manual labour; he is broke and his health is failing and he cannot sell his
land and go to a healthy place because of colonization rules!
This is the plight of the farmer, also eloquently reported by
Victor Ivan (7 Aug. 2016, Ravaya).Dr. U.W is a veteran agriculturist who lives
in Kandy and has served the coconut, rubber, and paddy growers for decades,
dedicating his life to agricultural science. Dr. Kamal Wickremasinghe (KW) is a
socio-political columnist living in Canberra, Australia. As far as I know, KW
is not an agriculturist. He is an articulate majoritarian public opinion (MPO)
holder, while Dr. UW represents main-stream agricultural science. I am a
science writer for the popular press, and lecturer in a technical college. So I
stand between the two mindsets and present my observations on the controversy.
A recent Sirara-Pethikade interview (23-12-2016) of Professor
Dharmawardana (a past Professor at Sri Jayawardenapura and a pioneer in food
science in Sri Lanka) is also very germane to the discussion. Prof. D points
out that main-stream scientists (MSS) and the MPO are often at loggerheads on
matters in science policy. MSS opposed tobacco and pointed out that already in
late 19th century that it was injurious to health. But the public adored the
cigarette until recently, with film stars and politicians giving an image of glamour
to smoking. Mainstream academics like Prof. John Yudkin pointed out six decades
ago that sugar was a deadly substance. It is only now that the public is giving
faint support for reducing the sugar levels in soft drinks.
Mainstream scientific opinion has argued against eating meat since
at least 1970. Red meat has also been classified as a class-II carcinogen by
the International Agency for Research into Cancer (IARC). The IARC is mandated
to signal a health Hazard, and not a health Risk. All open flames are fire
hazards, but not necessarily a fire risk – for example, a flame in a safety
lantern is not a fire risk. A health HAZARD becomes a health RISK only if
people are exposed to the hazard above a threshold. Eating "too much"
red meat becomes a health risk. Petroleum and diesel fumes are a class-I hazard
AND a health risk. Strangely, no one has demanded their ban citing a
"precautionary principle"
Thus mainstream academics have led the warning against tobacco,
sugar, consumption of fat and meat. However, agrochemicals are both good and
bad. The green movement began in the 1970s, heralded by Rachel Carson's book
"Silent Spring". It created a public mindset that is ever suspicious
of all agrochemicals, and even pasteurization of milk, fluoridation of municipal
water or vaccinations. That the environment is "polluted" is a common
MPO. Health-food & back-to-nature websites, and the internet blogs of
self-styled "alternative" medical-gurus like Dr. Mercola are very
popular and extremely lucrative to the Mercola types. Some of the public are so
frightened that they drink only bottled water even in modern municipalities, or
install reverse-osmosis machines in their homes.
They want agrochemicals banned claiming "precautionary
principles". Dr. Kamal Wickremasinghe's line of thinking fits this
majoritarian public mindset which is not only militant, accuses main-stream
scientists of being agents of agro-business. Dr. KW's accusations against UW
and other scientists are sweepingly general and similar to Donald Trump's
branding all Mexicans as rapists, rogues and drug dealers. KW refers to
Alastair Macintosh's silly article of 1996 to take "arms against the
mercenaries".
KW generalizes the discussion about mercenaries and glyphosate to
cover the alleged "loss of traditional rice varieties", and in the
same breath declares that the Green revolution is a fraud. Such extreme
positions are standard beliefs of the lunatic fringe of the green movement, and
prevent anyone from mo.unting a meaningful dialogue. Neither Macintoch nor KW
is probably aware that it was the mainstream scientists at Bathalaoda who
preserved the germ lines of the traditional rice varieties. Furthermore, if not
for the work of the Bathalagoda and Kundasle scientists from 1920 onwards,
providing food for this nation, it would have lost not just its traditional
rice varieties, but a good part of its people. But that is a long story.
The erroneous information probably went to Dr. KW in Canberra from
Alastair Macintosh in Scotland, who got it from the Indian activist Shiva
Vandana via her Sri Lankan acolytes. It is a pity that KW did not visit
Bathalagoda to get the facts from the source.
It is NOT true that main-stream academics are in the pay of the
agro-business. In fact, university scientists have been zealous watch dogs of
environmental incursions, and participate extensively in international
regulatory bodies like the WHO. Furthermore, ignoring the fact that columnists
like KW will accuse scientists of being mercenaries, main-stream scientists have
fearlessly come forward to defend the use of the very simplest mineral
fertilizers (rock phosphate, Urea, Nitrate) and a well-known popular herbicide
known as Glyphosate whose use is inextricably linked with genetically modified
(GMO) foods that are now common in North America. Some 117 Nobel laureates,
writing to the Washington Post on 4th July 2016 rebuked advocacy-organizations
like Greenpeace for false propaganda and for funding skewed experiments
designed to support their preconceived positions. Interestingly, Dr. KW comes
up with references falling into the category of skewed experiments?
All the available data were evaluated by the Joint Committee on
Pesticide Residues (JCPR) of the WHO and the FAO when they issued their risk
assessment on May 16th, 2016. Owing to the misunderstandings created by the
IARC classification of Glyphosate as a Class-II carcinogen, many governments
including Australia and New Zealand (NZ) reviewed Glyphosate once again. The
report issued by NZ should interest Dr. KW living in Australia. NZ evaluated
all the research available by 2016 and the judgment was that Glyphosate posed
absolutely no health risk.
1. Report of the JCPR, May, 2016:
http://www.who.int/foodsafety/jmprsummary2016.pdf
2. Report of the NZ-government, August 2016:
http://www.epa.govt.nz/hazardous-substances/pop_hs_topics/glyphosate_learn/Pages/default.aspx
3. Review of the Glyphosate debate by Canadian Scientists:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pE_vjC0z-z4
The majority of scientists are agreed that the consumption of
water from a class of shallow household wells is the cause of kidney disease
and presented empirical evidence for it, and that agrochemicals have nothing to
do with it. But Dr. KW is persuaded that it is glyphosate and arsenic, because
a "new breed of intellectuals" (led by a psychic lady and some
politicians) have said so, although so far without evidence. Dr. KW even senses
a battle between "Peradeniya elites" and others! That is enough for
him to invoke the precautionary principle and declare those who hold the
opposite opinion to be mercenaries!
BodhiDhanapal
Canada
Canada
http://www.island.lk/index.php?page_cat=article-details&page=article-details&code_title=157932
Rice imports still under study after typhoons
12/28/2016
BusinessWorld
BusinessWorld
THE government is waiting to assess the impact of
three typhoons on major rice-producing provinces in the fourth quarter before
deciding whether it will resort to rice imports next year, the National Food Authority (NFA)
said.The NFA said it has a pending proposal for another 250,000 metric tons of
government-to-government rice imports in the first quarter of 2017, which remains
subject to approval.
“The NFA’s recommendation for rice importation is still for evaluation of the NFA Council,” said
Marietta J. Ablaza, spokesperson for the state- run agency, in a phone
interview last week.
Among the factors being evaluated were the impact
on production of typhoons Karen and Lawin, which hit the country in October,
and typhoon Nina this week.The importation deal, should it push through, will be slated
under a government-to-government procurement scheme.
Typhoons Karen and Lawin caused estimated losses
of 516,133 MT of palay, or unmilled rice, valued at P11.03 billion, according
to the Department of Agriculture’s Nov. 4 damage report.The Philippine
Statistics Authority reported that palay output may come in at 17.91 million MT
for 2016, lower than the 2015 total of 18.15 million MT, after a prolonged dry
spell reduced the area harvested this year.
In a statement released over the weekend, the
NFA, however, assured that rice stocks are sufficient in typhoon Nina-affected
areas with the agency’s release of more than 10,000 50-kilo bags for
distribution to typhoon victims.The National Economic and Development
Authority’s (NEDA) director for agriculture, natural resources and environment,
Mercedita A. Sombilla, who chairs the NFA Council, said that the domestic
supply and demand situation of rice will still have to be assessed some time in
January.
Even in light of the recent typhoon, Ms. Sombilla
said that the government sees no urgent need for the Philippines, one of the
world’s top rice importers, to open up orders for imports.
“We are still assessing damage to agri. I would
think (it is) not necessary since all rice planted are supposed to be harvested
now,” Ms. Sombilla, also a NEDA Assistant Secretary, said in a text message on
Tuesday.
On Monday, the typhoon cut through southern Luzon
and the eastern Visayas, according to the Philippine Atmospheric, Geophysical
and Astronomical Services Administration, the weather bureau also known as
PAGASA.The country has 250,000 metric tons remaining from a standby authority
to import 500,000 MT approved by the previous government.As
of Nov. 1, rice stocks stood at 3.30 million MT, sufficient for 97 days of
consumption.
The initial 250,000 MT standby authority was
awarded to the world’s top rice exporters on Aug. 31 - with Thailand and Vietnam winning
100,000 MT and 150,000 MT, respectively, under the government-to-government import scheme.In addition, the NFA in September opened
up to private traders the importation of an additional 805,200 metric tons of rice
under the minimum access volume (MAV) scheme.
The MAV rice importation program allows private traders to apply for the
delivery of 293,100 MT each from Thailand and Vietnam.Under the omnibus origin
scheme, importers can also buy up to 50,000 MT each from China, top
suppliers India and Pakistan, up to 15,000 MT from Australia, up to 4,000 MT
from El Salvador, and 50,000 MT from any other country.In its list of
applicants posted Dec. 21 on its Web site, the NFA has so far authorized
shipments totaling 641,080 tons from Thailand, Vietnam, Pakistan, and India.All
rice under the MAV importation scheme is expected to arrive in the country not
later than Feb. 28 next year and is subject to a 35% tariff.
http://www.world-grain.com/news/news%20home/LexisNexisArticle.aspx?articleid=2698672141
VN earns $2.2b from rice export
this year
Update: December, 29/2016 - 11:28
The decline in rice export is attributed to the
prolonged El Nino phenomenon in the central and Central Highlands, saline
intrusion in the Mekong Delta and flooding in the north, central and Central
Highlands. — Photo doanhnghiep.vnNỘI — Việt Nam exported
an estimated 4.88 million tonnes of rice this year, earning US$2.2 billion,
down 25.8 per cent in volume and 21.2 per cent in value year-on-year.
This was revealed by the Ministry of
Agriculture and Rural Development. In December alone, 399,000 tonnes of
rice worth $181 million were shipped abroad. China remains the largest
rice importer of Việt Nam with market share of 35.9 per cent. In the past 11
months, Việt Nam shipped 1.61 million tonnes worth $722.2 million to China,
down 20.5 per cent in volume and 11.7 per cent in value from 2015.
Ghana is Việt Nam’s second largest rice importer with an 11.1 per cent market share. Markets with strong drops in Vietnamese rice imports are the Philippines (down 65 per cent), Malaysia (48 per cent), the United States (33 per cent) and Singapore (30.7 per cent), as well as Indonesia (22 per cent), the Ivory Coast (21.5 per cent) and Hong Kong (19 per cent). The decline in rice export is attributed to the prolonged El Nino phenomenon in the central and Central Highlands, saline intrusion in the Mekong Delta and flooding in the north, central and Central Highlands. Rice production this year decreased in both cultivation area and output, particularly in the south. Total rice output is estimated at 43.6 million tonnes, down 3.3 per cent from last year. — VNS
http://vietnamnews.vn/economy/348892/vn-earns-22b-from-rice-export-this-year.html#O0mJbJBhldlXZbr2.99
USDA announces latest installment
of conservation funding
USDA providing $225 million for new round of conservation
programs, expects $500 million in matching funds from partner organizations.
Dec 27, 2016
USDA has announced funding for 88 new projects under the
Regional Conservation Partnership Program or RCPP, the agricultural
conservation initiative created in the Agricultural Act of 2014 or the 2014
farm bill.The federal government is providing $225 million for the projects,
but USDA expects public and private partners to contribute another $500 million
for the conservation efforts, according to Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack.Among
the biggest projects are two that will provide $15 million to rice-specific
Environmental Quality Incentives Program and Conservation Stewardship Program
conservation practices in Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi and Missouri and to
supplement construction of a reservoir for irrigation water in Texas.“RCPP
plays a critical role in connecting partners with producers to design and
implement conservation solutions that benefit both natural resources and
agriculture,” Vilsack said. “The farm bill is the largest source of federal
funding for private lands conservation, and RCPP is contributing innovative
conservation solutions to communities across the country.”
Vilsack said RCPP offers new opportunities for the NRCS,
conservation partners and agricultural producers to work together to harness
innovation, expand the conservation mission, and demonstrate the value and
efficacy of voluntary, private lands conservation.
Stronger rural economies
“The program is increasing investment in conservation from a
diversity of partners, leading to cleaner and more abundant water, improved
soil and air quality, enhanced wildlife habitat, and stronger rural economies.
(For more information on the RCPP, visit http://bit.ly/2iBbnw9.)
Water quality and drought are dominant themes in this year's
RCPP project list with 46 of the 88 projects focusing on water resource
concerns. More than a fourth of the projects are focused on improving fish and
wildlife habitat.
USA Rice Federation, through its USA Rice-Ducks Unlimited Rice
Stewardship Partnership, was awarded funding for two projects bringing $15
million to the Mid-South and Gulf Coast's rice-growing regions. The NRCS funds,
along with $15-plus million in financial and in-kind support of 45 companies
and organizations, will help producers implement a variety of conservation
practices on their operations.USA Rice took the lead for the Mid-South
Graduated Water Stewardship Program, which was awarded $7 million to be used
for rice-specific EQIP and CSP contracts in Arkansas, Mississippi, Missouri,
and Central and Northeast Louisiana.
Good timing for farmers
The second project, is led by the Lower Colorado River Authority
and was awarded $8 million to supplement the building of a conservation
reservoir in Eagle Lake, Texas to provide water for irrigation and flooded water
bird habitat across 50,000 acres of ricelands.“The notification that our
proposals were awarded is just thrilling, the news of this funding could really
not have come at a better time,” said Jeff Durand, Louisiana rice farmer and
co-chair of the Rice Stewardship Partnership.
“As producers we’re dealing with an ongoing streak of low
commodity prices and luckily, the wide suite of practices available through
EQIP and CSP will, in most cases, improve our bottom lines and add to our
overall sustainability as an industry.”
Speaking at the USA Rice Outlook Conference in Memphis,
USDA-NRCS Chief Jason Weller said he was “proud of the partnership NRCS has
with the rice industry...for your commitment to being partners with us to
invest in conservation and really be national leaders in production
agriculture.”With today's announcement, the USDA's Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) is investing a total of $825 million in 286
projects, bringing together more than 2,000 conservation partners who have
committed an estimated $1.4 billion in financial and technical assistance,
Vilsack said.
Signups in late 2017
By 2018, NRCS and its partners, including Indian tribes,
nonprofit organizations, state and local governments, private industry, water
districts, universities and many others, will have invested at least $2.4
billion through RCPP.Since 2009, USDA has invested more than $29 billion to
help producers make conservation improvements, working with as many as 500,000
farmers, ranchers and landowners to protect over 400 million acres nationwide,
boosting soil and air quality, cleaning and conserving water and enhancing
wildlife habitat.Signups for portions of the latest round of projects could
occur by late 2017.
http://www.deltafarmpress.com/rice/usda-announces-latest-installment-conservation-funding
Plastic’ or not? Over 100 bags of
fake rice seized in Nigeria
Paul Adepoju and Yemisi Adegoke,
CNNPublished: December 28, 2016, 8:14 am
LAGOS, Nigeria (CNN) — Nigerian authorities have seized 2.5 metric tons of reportedly
fake rice during the holiday season.On Tuesday, the Nigerian Custom Service said it intercepted 102 bags of a brand called Best
Tomato Rice after the recipient of a gift of rice alerted authorities. The
health ministry released a statement on Friday urging Nigerians to remain calm
after preliminary findings found no evidence that the rice was plastic or
consisted of toxic chemical substances. Yet, the country’s National Agency for
Food Drug Administration Control has not released their investigative report.
The health minister’s statement contradicts earlier reports from customs officials.Mamudu Haruna,
comptroller of the Federal Operations Unit, called it “plastic” rice at a press
briefing in Lagos Thursday. “We have done the preliminary analysis on the
plastic rice. After boiling, it was sticky and only God knows what would have
happened if people consumed it.”Haruna described the importers of the fake rice
as “economy saboteurs” seeking to capitalize off of Nigerians looking for
bargains during the Christmas and New Year holiday season.
It is unclear where the shipment
of rice originated. “A consultant said he was given 221 bags to distribute,”
Jerry Attah, the public relations officer for the assistant superintendent of
customs, told CNN.One customer who avoided a potential mishap was Kikelomo
Adediti. She said she bought 10 cups of the product (about 2 kg) from a small
retailer in the Ikeja area of Lagos, in November.
“It looked perfectly normal and
cost less [than regular rice] so I thought I got a great deal. Normally it
would take about 20 minutes [to cook] but after 30 minutes it was still hard. I
added more water and the aroma was chemical in nature so I decided to discard
it thinking it had expired,” she told CNN. Adediti didn’t formally report the
incident.
In another case, a woman who
received rice as a gift noticed something was wrong after cooking it. Her
husband then called customs officials.
Plastic, resin
or none of the above
Yet, it’s still unclear what the
rice is made of.“If you look at it it’s rice. If you look at the pictures it’s
rice. If you cook it and eat it it’s rice. It’s only when you touch it you’ll
feel it that you realize it’s not,” Attah told CNN.
“That’s why I call it fake rice,
not plastic rice. To me it’s more like flour coated in maybe rubber… I don’t
know the kind of formulations or chemicals they use,” he said.Attah said that a
total of 221 bags — each weighing 25 kilos — came into Nigeria, but only 102 were
recovered, which means 119 have already been distributed.
Nigerians’
love for rice
Rice is a major staple food in
Nigeria and a favorite holiday meal, often prepared as jollof rice.It is
estimated that Nigerians consume 6 million metric
tons of rice per year; in 2013, former
minister of agriculture, Dr. Akinwumi Adesina, said the country spends more
than $1 billion annually to import rice.“Though rice contribute a significant
proportion of the food requirements of the [Nigerian] population, production
capacity is far below the national requirements. In order to meet the
increasing demand, Nigeria has had to resort to importation of milled rice to
bridge the gap between domestic demand and supply,” according to Professor
Tunji Akande, author of An overview of the Nigerian Rice Economy.
Forex woes
With imports adversely affected
by the country’s foreign exchange woes and the continued rise of the dollar
against Nigeria’s currency the Naira, the cost of rice has more than doubled.Bags
of rice were on sale for NGN22,000 in Bodija market Ibadan and other major
Nigerian markets on Thursday, compared with about NGN10,000 a year ago.The
desire for cheaper rice makes Nigerians vulnerable to counterfeit foods
industry: “Rice is very expensive and people are looking for where to get it at
cheaper rates. If a regular bag costs NGN17,000 but the plastic one is being
sold for 9,000, many Nigerian families will buy it,” said economics expert
Lanre Adigun.
“This is further aided by the
porous nature of Nigeria’s borders. Since the Nigerian government had already banned rice importation into the country through the land borders, the commodity is
still being smuggled into the country through the border with Benin Republic.
You can go to any market and you will see all sorts of rice imported through
the land borders,” said Feyikemi Oladokun, a nutrition expert who works with
the agriculture ministry in Kwara state.
Not just
Nigeria
In 2011, a Korean news report revealed some fake rice is produced from potatoes that are
shaped as rice with the addition of industrial resin. Even when cooked, the
report said the rice remained hard.Dr. Victoria Feyikemi of Babcock University
Hospital Ogun state, Nigeria, said the medical consequences of consuming such
products can be severe because the fake rice has synthetic resin that is
harmful to the body.“When you eat three bowls of this rice, you are basically
ingesting one vinyl bag and the toxicity and associated pathologies are
numerous. We cannot afford to add plastic rice-associated medical emergencies
to our numerous health challenges in Nigeria, remember we are still struggling
with Lassa fever,” she said.
http://khon2.com/2016/12/28/plastic-or-not-over-100-bags-of-fake-rice-seized-in-nigeria/
Rice millers brought under control,
farmers get MSP
THE HANS INDIA |
Dec 29,2016 , 04:56 AM IST
A huge quantity of rice bags lying in godowns
of rice millers in Kamareddy
Kamareddy:
Gone are the days when rice millers used to dictate terms to the
agricultural market in selling their food grains. It used to be very difficult
to get back the rice from them given under the Custom Milling Rice (CMR) quota.
However, with the government setting up purchasing centres and the officials of
the civil supplies department acting tough on the directions of the Chief
Minister K Chandrashekar Rao, the millers are returning the milled rice
immediately to the government. They have returned 2,75,430 quintals of
rice and this is the outcome of some of
the reforms undertaken in the civil supplies department.
Under the CMR, the State government initially
purchases husked rice from the farmers and later allocates it to various mills
for processing. Under the levy price policy, the rice millers are permitted to
sell a certain percentage of rice procured by them in the open market and the
remaining levy rice is again collected by the government agencies at a minimum
support price. The State government decided to set up large number of
purchasing centres to enable the farmers to sell their produce at a minimum
support price without being exploited by the middlemen or brokers.
Initially, the officials estimated that the
government would be able to purchase one
lakh of food grains at various purchasing centres and review meetings were
conducted in the district in this regard in which the Minister for Agriculture
and Cooperatives Pocharam Srinivas Reddyand District Collector N Satyanarayana
took part.However, they were able to collect more than what they imagined. A
total of 1.20 lakh metric tonnes of good grains were collected in all the 147
purchasing centres in the district. As
many as 35,000 farmers were paid Rs 147 crore in the process.
The District Collector allocates the quota or
grains to the rice millers directly on the basis of the capacities of the
millers. For milling one quintal of rice, each miller was being paid Rs 32.
According to estimates, while 79,000 metric tonnes of rice has to return under
CMR, the civil supplied department has got back 27, 543 metric tonnes of rice,
which is 34. 5 per cent of the total allocated grains. The millers are returning the rice fast
without creating any hurdles as District Collector Satyanarayana, Joint
Collector Sathaiah and district civil supplies officer Ramesh are closing
monitoring them.
The rice that is returned after milling has to
be supplied to the hostels of various schools under the fine rice scheme taken
up on a prestigious note by the government. In order to implement this, 550
metric tonnes of rice (5,500 quintals) are needed.Earlier, rice had to be
imported from the Andhra region, incurring a lot of expenditure. But now, there
is no need. The government is taking the necessary steps taking into
consideration the needs of the district.
The
government set up a large number of food grains purchasing centres, thus,
cutting the rice milers to size. As a result,
the rice millers are now trying to keep the farmers in good humour by offering
minimum support price to them.Now, the farmers are coming to the government
purchasing centres to sell their produce so that they may not be taken for a
ride by the middlemen or millers. They are hoping to make some profits.
-BY Ambeer Rajasekhar
http://www.thehansindia.com/posts/index/Nizamabad-Tab/2016-12-29/Rice-millers-brought-under-control-farmers-get-MSP/270936
Rice millers
protest demand of bribe by FCI officials
Members of the Rice Millers Association argue with police officials during a protest outside the FCI depot in Jagraon on Wednesday. A Tribune photograph
Jaswant Shetra
Jagraon, December 28
A high drama was
witnessed outside the Food Corporation of India (FCI), Jagraon depot, today
when members of the Rice Millers Association, Jagraon, held a protest outside
it.While raising slogans against the FCI authorities, the members of the
association led by its Jagraon president Hari Om alleged that the FCI officials
demanded bribe from them for dumping their rice in the depot.“Earlier, we used
to pay bribe to the FCI officials but after demonetisation, we are not able to
pay bribe to them due to which we are being harassed,” alleged Hari Om.He also
objected to the presence of RTI activist Kapil Bansal in the FCI office
claiming that the FCI authorities accept bribes from rice millers through
Bansal.
Bansal, on the
other hand, said he had sought information about some rice mills under the RTI
Act due to which some rice millers were targeting him.“I visited the FCI office
today to ask about the status of information I had sought under the RTI Act”,
claimed Bansal.After some time, a police team also reached the spot. The police
tried to pacify the protesting rice millers. But they continued raising
slogans.When the SSP, Jagraon, Opinderjit Singh Ghuman, got information about
the matter, he rushed DSP (D) RS Bhullar to the spot. The rice millers also
lodged a written complaint with the police alleging that the FCI authorities
demanded bribe from them.
Confirming that
the police have received a complaint from the association, Bhullar said they
would investigate the matter and an appropriate action would be taken in this
regard.Denying the allegations of demanding bribe, Ravi Srivastav Assistant
Manager, FCI Jagraon depot, said the protest was the result of an internal
dispute between the rice mill owners and they were wrongly blaming the FCI
authorities for the same.
http://www.tribuneindia.com/news/ludhiana/rice-millers-protest-demand-of-bribe-by-fci-officials/343112.html
Business
booming in Parksville Qualicum Beach for Cedar Sky Foods
Co-founders of Cedar Sky Foods,
the husband and wife duo of Chris and Crystal Niddrie, stand in front of their
store at 1065 Herring Gull Way in Parksville, where they cook locally-sourced
products and make healthy meals for sale in the community.
Parksville posted Dec 27, 2016 at 9:00 AM
AMBER-LEA MARIE
Special to The NEWS
Husband and wife co-founders of Cedar Sky Foods, Chris and Crystal Niddrie, say they
are making it their mission to source and use local, sustainable ingredients to
match the needs of people in Parksville Qualicum Beach.
“We’re a commercial food
production facility, and have been in business for over 10 years,” said
Crystal. “We just started out doing retail products for customers who can order
from our website. They can either pick up or we can deliver from Qualicum Beach
to Nanaimo.”
Both born and raised in Alberta,
Crystal said the couple decided to move their family and business to Vancouver
Island last year.
“We outgrew our business space in
Calgary and needed to move our facility,” Crystal said. “We opened (in
Parksville) in May, and since being here, we’ve found the community to be so
supportive of our business. People walk in just to shake our hands and welcome
us.”
“A lot of our retail customers
are seniors, busy professionals and busy parents — anybody who really needs
help in the kitchen with meal preparation,” said Crystal. “We have a lot of
entrées for one, and in the New Year we’re going to be expanding with a lot
more family-size and family-friendly entrées.”
Since transitioning to Island
life, business on the West Coast has boomed for the Niddries.
“It was our intent in moving here
that because we’re in such close proximity to so many fabulous farmers and
growers, that we wanted to use that produce to create great products,” said
Crystal. “We try to use and source local ingredients as much as possible, lots
of B.C. produce.”
From braised pork ribs with
pineapple rice and chef’s vegetables, to butter chicken with basmati rice, Chef
Chris’ culinary background, Chef de Cuisine designation and Red Seal
certification sauté together well when creating in the kitchen.
“We have quite a variety of
different types of meals,” said Crystal, mentioning that they do have
vegetarian meals as well.
Extra consideration comes into
play when trying to meet the needs of people with food restrictions.
“We get a lot of customers that
are looking specifically for gluten-free and nut-free products, so we can
satisfy that,” said Crystal. “We are a dedicated gluten and nut-free facility,”
Crystal noted that their food is
great for anybody: “You don’t have to have restrictions to enjoy our products.”
In addition to Cedar Sky Foods’ chef-prepared, frozen, retail meals,
the Niddries said when they moved here they continued doing food products
for wholesale and food service products for grocery stores.
“It was certainly a challenge to
move our business and re-establish customers, but things are going very well,”
said Crystal. “It has been well worth it for us and our family and our overall
happiness.”
Cedar Sky Foods is located in the Parksville Industrial Area at
1065 Herring Gull Way. Call 250-248-5663 or email: info@cedarskyfoods.com
http://www.pqbnews.com/business/408416056.html
Asia
Rice-Thailand, Vietnam dull amid year-end holidays
| HANOI
Dec 28 Rice markets in the world's biggest exporters of the
grain saw barely any deals amid Christmas and New Year holidays, traders said
on Wednesday.Prices in Vietnam, the world's third-biggest rice exporter, were
little changed from last week, with Vietnam quoting 5-percent broken rice
RI-VNBKN5-P1 at $335-$345 a tonne, FOB basis, compared with $335-$350 a week
earlier."Market is just quiet during this Christmas and New Year holiday;
there's only a few traders selling domestically as they have some stockpile
left, but no exports," said a Ho Chi Minh City-based trader."There's
some private contracts with the Philippines about to be shipped and there's
barely any order from China," said another trader in Vietnam.
Vietnam is estimated to ship 4.88
million tonnes of rice in 2016, down 25.8 percent from a year earlier, the
agriculture ministry has said.Thailand is also expected to have no new rice
order until after the New Year holiday."It's quiet... prices are the same
in Thai baht, but the depreciation of Thai baht made them look less in dollar
terms," said a Bangkok-based trader.The trader quoted the benchmark
5-percent broken rice RI-THBKN5-P1 at $355-$360 a tonne on Wednesday, compared
to $360 a week ago.
(Reporting by Mai Nguyen in
Hanoi; Additional reporting by Pairat Temphairojana in Bangkok; Editing by
Amrutha Gayathri)
http://in.reuters.com/article/asia-rice-idINL4N1EN2G3
Ag news top 10 in 2016
Posted
Dec 28, 2016 at 1:13 PM
Based on an informal poll of agricultural experts across the
state, here are the top 10 Arkansas agricultural stories of 2016:
By Ryan McGeeney / UofA Division of
Ag
The 2016 season proved a difficult year for
many Arkansas growers. Severe flooding in August impacted production to the
tune of an approximately $50 million crop loss, and an unprecedented political
season cast doubt on the future of international trade agreements and farm
subsidies.
Based
on an informal poll of agricultural experts across the state, here are the top
10 Arkansas agricultural stories of 2016:
1. Widespread reports of dicamba drift injury in
soybeans, as some growers begin in off-label applications on new
dicamba-resistant Monsanto crops. We covered the initial reports of drift injury in July, as well as
some of the fallout, as the Arkansas State Plant Boardweighed its options as Monsanto edged toward bringing a new dicamba-based herbicide
technology to market.
2. Arkansas growers suffer nearly $50 million in
crop losses due to significant August flooding, and a disaster declaration
issued. After weeks of
heavy, intermittent flooding in August, agronomists and economists with the
Division of Agriculture estimated a significant economic loss for Arkansas
producers. Arkansas Governor Asa Hutchinson a federal disaster declaration for
12 counties.
3. Researchers
with University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture and the Arkansas
Game and Fish Commission begin tracking spread of chronic wasting disease in
deer and elk throughout Arkansas. As reports of chronic wasting disease in deer
and elk persisted, biological researchers in the state embarked in an effort to
determine the location and prevalence of the disease in deer and elk herds in
the state.
4. Tony Windham steps down as director of the
Cooperative Extension Service after 28 years with the University of Arkansas
System. After initially
working with Arkansas growers as an economist in 1988, Windham was eventually
appointed associate vice president for agriculture and director in 2010. Mark
Cochran, vice president-Agriculture and head of the Division of Agriculture,
named Dr. Rick Cartwright as interim director.
5. Arkansas officials visit Cuba as the U.S.
considers lifting trade sanctions. As a major producer of both rice and poultry,
Arkansas may prove particularly attractive to the island nation as a future
trading partner.
6. The Division of Agriculture's Rice Research
and Extension Center unveils its new Foundation Seed Facility in Stuttgart.Replacing a
facility that had stood since the 1950's, the Division of Agriculture opened
its news Foundation Seed Facility in August.
7. Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal appears
to stall as voters chose between two presidential candidates, both of whom
stated they were against it. After months of
diplomacy and wrangling, the wide-reaching trade agreement, which would broadly
liberalize trade rules and tariffs, may ultimately fail to come to fruition. In
March, Ambassador Darci Vetter of the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative
spoke about the proposed trade agreement at the University of Arkansas at
Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law.
8. Arkansas cotton growers rebound from 2015's
historic low acreage of 210,000 acres, planting about 57 percent more acreage.Although we've never strictly been "the
land of cotton," growers on the Arkansas side of the Delta came back
strong with increased acreage.
9. Kudzu bugs expand in eastern Arkansas.After almost
five years of waiting, the inevitable finally arrived: Kudzu bugs made their
way across the Delta, into Arkansas, poised to begin affecting soybeans in the
fall. Division of Agriculture etymologists and agricultural agents wasted no
time in training county agents in identifying and controlling the pests, in an
effort to arrest their further spread.
10. Arkansas growers abandon grain sorghum in
2016, after huge spike during the previous year. Easy come, easy
go. Citing dismal market prices and an impending threat from sugarcane aphids,
Arkansas growers quickly ended their single-season love affair with the row
crops.
For more
information about agriculture in Arkansas, contact your local Cooperative Extension
Service agent, or visit www.uaex.edu
http://www.stuttgartdailyleader.com/news/20161228/ag-news-top-10-in-2016
Half-rice order in eateries
pushed
Published December
28, 2016, 10:00 PM
by
Charissa M. Luci
The head of the House Committee
on Health wants to require restaurants, hotels, inns, canteens, steakhouses,
eateries and other food establishments to add an order of half rice on their
menus to address rice wastage.Quoting the data from the Food and Nutrition
Research Institute (FNRI), Quezon Rep. Angelina Tan has filed House Bill (HB)
2855 to reduce rice wastage.
Tan said each Filipino wastes an
average of three tablespoons or nine grams of rice daily, which is equivalent
to 3.3 kilos per year.“It seeks to penalize the practice of some restaurants,
hotels, inns, canteens, steakhouses, eateries and the like of refusing to serve
order of rice from a customer if it be less than one cup,” she said.The bill
was originally sponsored by Senator Ferdinand Marcos Jr. during the previous
Congress.According to the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), with 94
million people and nine grams of wasted rice per day, the total wastage comes
to 308,000 tons, which is 36 percent of 2011 rice imports.
It translates to at least
$535,000 (P23 million) every day or $223 million a year, an amount sufficient
to feed 4.3 million people, Tan noted.“This measure will considerably reduce
rice wastage on these business establishments by letting their customers to
order just the right amount of rice that they can consume,” she said.Under HB
2855, food establishments must charge their customers half the price for the
half rice they are serving.”“Half rice” shall mean one half cup of the one full
cup of rice served.The bill suggests a fine of R20,000 for the first offense,
R50,000 for second and R100,000 for the third and succeeding offenses.
http://news.mb.com.ph/2016/12/28/half-rice-order-in-eateries-pushed/
IRRI’s golden
anniversary: a tribute
IRRI is one of four institutions
established over the years, with the support of Food and Agriculture
Organization of the UN to conduct research and development work on the world’s
four most common staples. There are international research institutes for corn
(in Mexico), potatoes (India) and wheat.IRRI was established on the basis of
funding commitments from two of the world’s wealthiest foundations—the
Rockefeller Brothers Foundation and the Ford Foundation. The decision to locate
the IRRI facilities in Los Baños was made with UP Los Baños research
cooperation in mind. Its first director, Dr. Vernon Chandler, is probably the
best-remembered of the directors who have headed IRRI in the last 50 years.
It was not long before IRRI
announced its first research breakthrough. That was the now-legendary IR-8, a
rice strain developed from a combination of a Taiwanese strain and an
Indonesian strain. IR-8 was designed to cope with the age-old Asian cultural
problems of water logging during the typhoon season and proneness to tillering.
IR-8 was said to have ushered in the Green Revolution. The Philippine
government was overjoyed that the rice research breakthrough was achieved in
the Philippines.But IRRI did not stop with IR-8. It went on to develop a
succession of miracle rice strains, each new one better than the last. The
other IRRI-developed rice strain that achieved the greatest success and
recognition was IR-36, developed several years after IR-8.
IRRI proved to be a victim of its
enormous success. After IR-8, IR-36 and a few other strains in-between, the
world – and this country—stopped being amazed by IRRI’s successive research
breakthroughs. People here and abroad came to take IRRI and its achievement
capabilities for granted.With less fanfare, IRRI continues to soldier on in its
still-impressive Los Baños facilities. In the world of agricultural
research—and particularly research on rice —IRRI remains a powerful force.
Thoughtful Filipinos are bound to
ask, despite all the rice-culture breakthroughs achieved by IRRI: why is
Philippine agriculture still so unproductive and why is the Philippines still
one of the world’s top rice importers? Why do IR-8 and the Green Revolution
appear to have gone for nought?
For the answer, one must not look
to the unsound, inconsistent and unsustained policies of the Philippine
government towards the agricultural sector in general and the rice industry in
particular. IRRI can only produce research breakthroughs; governments have to
make good use of the breakthroughs.Carry on with your fine work, IRRI. By no
means have you ceased to be appreciated. Best of luck for your next 50 years.
http://thestandard.com.ph/opinion/columns/business-class-by-rudy-romero/225301/irri-s-golden-anniversary-a-tribute.html