China changes rice import tariffs
2018-07-02
15:53:49Ecns.cnEditor : Mo Hong'
(ECNS) - China's Ministry of
Finance has announced a change in tariffs on rice imports from July 1,
involving 14 items in total.Rice products imported from certain countries will
abide by specific tariff rates in accordance with the rules of the World Trade
Organization, the World Customs Organization and bilateral free trade
agreements, the ministry said.
Tariffs on unhusked rice, whole
rice, broken rice, fine powder of rice, and coarse powder and grain of rice
imported from the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) will be at 50
percent, 50 percent, 5 percent, 40 percent, and 5percent, respectively.
The MFN tariff rate for rice,
tariff-rate quotas and ordinary tariff rate will not be affected by the new
policy.
The tariff adjustment is based on
changes to domestic rice industry standards, and the purpose is to better adapt
to the needs of trade development, the ministry said.
Adjustment of the tariff rate
conforms to the provisions of multilateral and bilateral agreements, serves to
fulfill China’s WTO commitments, and safeguards the normal trade order between
China and ASEAN countries, according to the ministry’s statement.
Decoupled payments as safety nets
for rice farmers NOW
Published June 30, 2018, 10:00 PM
Quantitative restrictions (QR) on
rice importation have not worked for us. Much of the benefits from price
support have been captured by the rice millers, middlemen, traders, and
retailers. But the small rice farmers remain poor.
Worse this policy artificially
kept domestic rice prices very high relative to the prices in the open global
market to the detriment of all consumers, including the small rice farmers
themselves who buy rice after exhausting the supplies they keep for their own
consumption.
We compounded our problem with
the policy of “buying high and selling low” which led to huge losses to the
National Food Authority (NFA) which the national government (meaning, all of
us) have to pay for through annual appropriations and forgone taxes. Moreover,
since the NFA can afford to buy only less than 5% of the total supply, its
impact on prices is illusory and at best temporary and palliative.
Worst still the management of
that 5% NFA supply left much to be desired with alleged overpricing;
inequitable distribution of cheap NFA rice to favored parties; re-bagging of
NFA rice and re-sale as commercial rice by unscrupulous millers and traders
and, now and then, reports of rotting rice in some of the NFA warehouses.
Clearly the better option is the
total lifting of quantitative restrictions and their replacement with tariffs
as we have committed to under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT)
of the World Trade Organization (WTO) in the Uruguay Round Trade Agreement in
1995. For the Philippines, rice was initially exempted from this agreement up
to 2005 to allow time for our domestic rice industry to prepare for the
competition. We received special treatment to extend the exemption up to 2012,
and, a second time up to June, 2017.
In agreeing to the second
extension, our trading partners exacted concessions in the imports of meat,
poultry, fruits and vegetables. Successfully negotiating for another extension
is unlikely and does not make sense. The non-rice concessions which our trading
partners will certainly impose on us in the end will cost us more.
However, since QR in the
importation of rice is enshrined in R.A. No. 8178, otherwise known as the
Agricultural Tariffication Act of 1996, the same need to be repealed/amended by
an act of Congress. Hence, we support the bills in Congress filed by
Congressman Arthur Yap in the Lower House, and Senator Ralph Recto in the
Senate to lift the rice QR and replace it with a modest tariff of 35%.
Both bills have several provisions in common, which we support, namely:
Both bills have several provisions in common, which we support, namely:
1)all duties collected from rice
tariffs to accrue to a Rice Competitiveness Enhancement Fund exclusively
earmarked to support the rice industry;
2) an enumeration of programs and
activities that will enhance productivity, competitiveness and incomes of rice
farms;
3) requirement for the Department
of Agriculture (DA) and the relevant agencies to finalize the Rice Industry
Road Map within 180 days after the enactment of the law on rice tariffication,
and very importantly,
4) the Rice Competitiveness
Enhancement Fund SHALL NOT REPLACE the DA’s rice program budgetary allocation,
but should be “complementary and supportive of the various and current funding
assistance windows and programs of DA and other government institutions.”
The previous week’s column (24
June 2018) “When 95 percent is better than 100 percent,” is an elaboration of
what we can do to make our rice farmers more productive, more competitive and
earn more in the medium- to the long-term. These measures will take time to put
into place and their impact felt. But the consequences of the lifting of rice
QR leading to depressed farm gate prices of palay (hence of rice farmers’
incomes) is dramatic, immediate and potentially traumatic.
Unfortunately, both of the
pending bills in Congress on rice tariffication gloss over this very important
point. Crop diversification, multiple cropping and transition to alternative
livelihoods by affected rice farmers will take more than five years. Ten years
is the more realistic time frame. They need the safety nets NOW!
Decoupled Payments
as Safety Nets
as Safety Nets
Safety nets are needed to cushion
the adverse impact of lower farm gate prices of palay on the welfare of rice
farmers. There are three basic options, namely: 1) the conventional price
support and procurement programs, 2) deficiency payments to individual rice
farmers when the market price falls below a bench mark price, and 3) decoupled
payments to all rice farmers to help them adjust to the free market of rice,
not related to price and quality of rice they produce, but time bound and
reduced over time.
We have been implementing price
support and rice procurement all these years. They have not worked and no
reason they will work now. Deficiency payments are unwieldy, time consuming and
costly to implement, and worse, prone to corruption. Best is by decoupled
payments whose only requirement is that the beneficiary farmer be a bonafide
rice farmer enrolled in the Registry System for Basic Sectors in Agriculture
(RSBSA).
We therefore support the proposal
of the Philippine Institute of Development Studies (PIDS), put forward by
Roehlano Briones, Ivory Myka Galang and Lovely Ann Tolin to provide direct
payments to all rice farmers based on area cultivated (with a ceiling) over a
transition period of say 10 years.
The payments will be sourced from
the tariffs collected from rice imports which Briones et al. estimated could
amount to P27–P28 billion every year for rice imports which could reach 4.4
million tons per year.
These decoupled payments should
be part of the Arthur Yap/Ralph Recto rice tariffication bills. The details
however should be worked out.
*****
Dr. Emil Q. Javier is a Member of the National Academy of Science and Technology (NAST) and also Chair of the Coalition for Agriculture Modernization in the Philippines (CAMP).
For any feedback , email eqjavier@yahoo.com.
Dr. Emil Q. Javier is a Member of the National Academy of Science and Technology (NAST) and also Chair of the Coalition for Agriculture Modernization in the Philippines (CAMP).
For any feedback , email eqjavier@yahoo.com.
Dr. Emil
Q. Javier is a Member of the National Academy of Science and Technology (NAST)
and also Chair of the Coalition for Agriculture Modernization in the
Philippines (CAMP).
For any feedback , email eqjavier@yahoo.com.
For any feedback , email eqjavier@yahoo.com.
EGYPT
Government imports rice due to
poor cultivation: Farmers syndicate chief
Al-Masry Al-Youm
July 1, 2018:6:36 pm
Chief of the farmers syndicate
Hussien Abdel Rahman Abu Sedam said on Sunday that the Egyptian government will
be importing rice following recent poor land cultivation, a far-cry from when
Egypt was once an exporter of rice.
Sedam questioned why the
government would import rice without considering the risk this would pose the
future of Egyptian farms and agriculture.
He pointed out that there are
multiple alternatives, such as the use of dry rice, a special crop that only
needs water every 15 days and can grow within 120 days, which would held in
rationalizing the use of water and preventing the land from fallowing.
Sedam also said that the
government can utilize the agricultural intensification system, which would
increase agricultural production while using less water.
He further suggested that the
Agricultural Research Center must cooperate with more advanced countries to
develop better varieties of dry rice that can bear the salinity of the land, as
this might be the best hope in helping Egypt’s water poverty crisis and secure
the people’s rice needs.
Ministry of Irrigation and Water
Resources decided in January 2018 to reduce size of the cultivated lands of
rice from 1.1 million acres to 724,200 acres, causing increase of rice prices.
Egypt’s Minister of Agriculture
and Land Reclamation Ezz Eddin Abo Setit stated in June that Egypt suffers from
water scarcity and falls below the level of water poverty, according to the
international classification of countries where per capita of water has
decreased.
He added that Egypt relies on a
major and steady source of water, which is Egypt’s share of the Nile water, and
the country is suffering from large increase in population, restricting the use
of water especially in the agricultural sector, the most water-consuming
regions.
He explained that overpopulation
increases demand on water for irrigation purposes to secure the food needs of the
country, and this amounts the pressure to make programs to rationalize use of
water in irrigation.
Edited translation from Al-Masry
Al-Youm
How border
closure affects Seme revenue, trades
Isaac Anumihe
Trade and economy watchers have admitted that smuggling of foreign
rice into the country has been on the increase from the inception of the
Mohammadu Buhari administration.
Although, he has taken several
measures to curb the influx of the commodity into the country the problem is
yet to abate.
In 2015, Central Bank of Nigeria issued a circular number
TED/FEM/ FPC/GEN/10/010 and dated June 23, 2015 which restricted 41 items from
accessing the foreign exchange for importation. Among the restricted items is
rice.Also, on March 23, 2016, Nigeria Customs Service (NCS) banned rice
importation through the land borders with effect from Friday, March 25, 2016.
The order which was given by the Comptroller-General of Customs, Colonel Hameed
Ali (rtd), was part of measures to block the identified loopholes in the
nation’s finance sector and to stimulate local rice production.
As if that was not enough, on June 19, 2018, Minister of
Agriculture and Rural Development, Chief Audu Ogbeh, announced the total
closure of Nigeria’s borders to rice smuggling and importation. According to
the Minister, the decision to shut the borders was to consolidate on the gains
by the government policies which had reduced rice importation from South East
Asia by more than 95 per cent in the past two years, and had seen the number of
local rice farmers grow from 5 million to 30 million.
Unfortunately the Minister did not mention the border areas to
be closed, but it was clearly indicated that he might be referring to Seme
Border where 75 per cent of smuggled rice enter the country. Seme Border,
according to reports, has over 1000 unapproved routes through which smuggling
take place.
However, in spite of government’s efforts to discourage rice
importation, Nigeria’s markets are still awash with cheap and better-packaged
foreign parboiled rice to the amazement of the authorities.
The question is, how does these banned items enter the markets?
A maritime lecturer in Lagos Business School, Lagos, Dr Frank
Ojadi submitted that the closure of the border will not help matters because
there is a high level collaboration between the officers and the smugglers.
Besides, apart from the normal rice for everybody, there are specific brands
for the diabetics which are imported. The Nigerian rice producers do not have
the technology to produce such special commodity.
“Our people have developed liking for foreign foods of which
rice is one. If we are able to produce the rice locally and it is cheaper than
the ones imported, then Nigerians can cope with. But we have a situation where
the foreign rice is far cheaper than the local ones. Closing the border is not
going to help because rice smuggling is a big racket at the borders between the
enforcement agencies and importers.
The rice that comes in are pretty cheaper. The rice you bring in
from abroad are different kinds of rice – rice for the diabetics and other
species. Then you ask, where are they bringing them from? Generally speaking,
banning rice or closing the border because of rice is not going to work. The
ones produced locally cannot compete with the ones coming from abroad. The
infrastructure required is not adequate to produce the quantity of rice needed
by the Nigerian consumers. So, you are bound to have rice coming in.
“You know most of the time the rice comes in bulk and there are
three hubs through which rice comes in. The locally-produced rice is not enough
for Nigerian consumers because the imported rice appears better and cheaper
because they don’t pay a duty and they import it in bulk” he said.
In his remarks, President, National Council of Managing
Directors of Licensed Customs Agents (NCMDLCA), and Managing Director, Eyis
Resources, Lucky Amiwero, suggested that instead of closing the border, the
Federal Government should negotiate with the ECOWAS country.
“Rice is not our staple food. Rice was introduced to us as a
Christmas food. But today we have taken it as our staple food. But if Nigeria
wants to exercise the ban on this food, there is a mutual administrative
assistance under the ECOWAS country to go and negotiate with other countries
within our borders. That does not mean that you will close the border.
Tell them and say look, for the importation of rice and crime
across the border, we don’t want our country to be used.
“If the border is closed, it will have economic implication. We
are not under emergency. There is need for government in power to sit down and
see how we can address that issue because the issue has to do with the demand
of foreign rice. If we have rice that is locally produced in large quantity,
nobody will like to bring rice into the country. But the government should do a
lot of things to be able to stem the tide of smuggling” he explained.
The Public Relations of Seme Border Customs where over 75 per
cent rice are smuggled into the country, Seidu Nurudeen, admitted that the
closure of the border will negatively affect the revenue of Nigeria but the
security of the country is more important.
“I believe the government is interested in securing the economy
of the country first. That is its primary consideration. The type of activity
(smuggling) is seriously affecting the security of the country. The economy is
not as primary as the security of the country. When you secure the border it
will definitely affect the economy of the country positively. All the other
activities (trades) are ongoing. When a policy directive is given by the
federal government, the border enforces it, even though there will be an
initial pain.
The closure will definitely affect the revenue negatively. That
is why it has been going down. Last year Seme collected a revenue of over N6
billion but I cannot estimate this year’s revenue. It depends on the policy of
the government,” he disclosed.
Paddy plantation
completed on 10.5 % of arable land
Published: June 30, 2018 10:40 am On: Business
Kathmandu, June 29
Paddy plantation has been carried
out on 10.5 per cent of 1.55 million hectares of arable land across the country
as of today.
According to Ministry of
Agriculture, Land Management and Cooperatives (MoALMC), commercial paddy
plantation across the country began from Sunday with the onset of the monsoon,
which looks favourable this year.
“Along with timely monsoon this
year, farmers are busy planting paddy. Plantation of the cereal crop has been
completed on 10.5 per cent of the arable land so far,” informed Maniratna Aryal, information officer at MoALMC.
completed on 10.5 per cent of the arable land so far,” informed Maniratna Aryal, information officer at MoALMC.
Aryal, who is also a senior
agriculture economist, opined that paddy plantation will be completed on more
than 35 per cent of cultivable land within the next week.
While paddy plantation was
completed on 42 per cent of arable land till mid-July last year, MoALMC
officials said that plantation of the cereal crop will be completed on more
than 50 per cent of arable land by the same time this year.
Owing to timely and favourable
monsoon, MoALMC is optimistic that the entire paddy plantation will be
completed by the end of July.
Meanwhile, the government expects
the paddy output in the upcoming fiscal year to surpass the production of
fiscal 2017-18. The country produced 5.23 million metric tonnes of paddy in the
ongoing fiscal year against the production target of 5.4 million metric tonnes.
As per MoALMC, paddy production target
was missed in the ongoing fiscal year owing to the unfavourable monsoon that
inundated many paddy farmlands during the year.
However, Aryal informed that
different government initiatives to promote commercial farming of paddy in the
country, with due focus on implementing the Prime Minister Agriculture
Modernisation Project to mechanise paddy farming, timely supply of seeds and
fertilisers and increased availability of irrigation facility, are expected to
boost production of paddy in the next fiscal.
Just a few days ago, the government
had inked an agreement with the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI)
for technical assistance to boost paddy production and help Nepal become
self-reliant in rice.
Though paddy production in Nepal
has been gradually increasing in recent years, it has not been able to
substitute
imports. The country has already imported rice worth Rs 24 billion in the first 10 months of the ongoing fiscal year.
imports. The country has already imported rice worth Rs 24 billion in the first 10 months of the ongoing fiscal year.
MoALMC officials say that the
country needs to produce almost 5.8 million metric tonnes of paddy every year
to meet the domestic demand.
A version of this article appears
in print on June 30, 2018 of The Himalayan Times.
De Oiled Rice Bran Market Growth Opportunities
By Regions, Type & Application; Trend Forecast To 2023
June 29, 2018
De Oiled Rice Bran Market report
is to help the user understand the market in terms of its classification,
segmentation, market potential, influential
trends, and the challenges that the
industry is facing. Deep researches and analysis were done during the
preparation of the De Oiled Rice Bran Market report.The report contains the
SWOT analysis of the market. Finally, the report contains the conclusion part
where the opinions of the industrial experts are included.
The aspirant’s will find this
report very helpful in understanding the De Oiled Rice Bran market in depth.
The data and the information regarding the De Oiled Rice Bran industry are
taken from reliable sources such as websites, annual reports of the companies,
journals, and others and were checked and validated by the market experts.
Global De Oiled Rice Bran market competition by top
manufacturers/players, with De Oiled Rice Bran sales volume,
Price (USD/Unit), revenue (Million USD) and market share for each
manufacturer/player; the top players including:
· Company 1
· Company 2
· Company 3
Along with De Oiled Rice Bran Market research analysis, buyer
also gets valuable information about global De Oiled Rice Bran Production and
its market share, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin, Supply,
Consumption, Export, Import volume and values for
following Regions:
· United States
· Germany
· UK
· Russia
· China
· Japan
· India
· Australia
·
And More…
Get Sample PDF of report @ https://www.360marketupdates.com/enquiry/request-sample/11057456
Detailed TOC of 2017-2022 Global De Oiled Rice Bran Market Report:
De Oiled Rice Bran Key Raw Materials Analysis:
· Key Raw Materials
· Price Trend of Key Raw Materials included in De Oiled
Rice Bran market
· Key Suppliers of Raw Materials
· Market Concentration Rate of Raw Materials
Industrial Chain, Sourcing Strategy and Downstream Buyers Involved
in De Oiled Rice Bran Market:
· De Oiled Rice Bran Industrial Chain Analysis
· Upstream Raw Materials Sourcing
· Raw Materials Sources of De Oiled Rice Bran market
Major Manufacturers in 2016
· Downstream Buyers
Marketing Strategy Analysis, Distributors/Traders:
· Marketing Channel for De Oiled Rice Bran Market
· Direct Marketing
· Indirect Marketing
· Marketing Channel Development Trend
· Market Positioning
· Pricing Strategy
· Brand Strategy
· Target Client
· Distributors/Traders List covered in De Oiled Rice
Bran market
Inquire for further detailed information about De Oiled Rice Bran
Market Report @ https://www.360marketupdates.com/enquiry/pre-order-enquiry/11057456
Market Effect Factors Analysis of De Oiled Rice Bran Market:
· Technology Progress/Risk
· Substitutes Threat
· Technology Progress in Related Industry
· Consumer Needs/Customer Preference Change
· Economic/Political Environmental Change
According to De Oiled Rice Bran
Market report, this report is divided by Product Types, with sales, revenue,
price, market share of each type.
On the basis of Product Type, De Oiled
Rice Bran market report displays the production, revenue, price, market
share and growth rate of each type, primarily split into:
· Type 1
· Type 2
· Type 3
On the basis on the end users/applications, De
Oiled Rice Bran market report focuses on the status and outlook for major
applications/end users, sales volume, market share and growth rate for each
application, including:
· Application 1
· Application 2
· Application 3
Price: $3000 (Single User)
No. of Pages: 150
Purchase full De Oiled Rice Bran Market Report @ https://www.360marketupdates.com/purchase/11057456
In the end, De Oiled Rice Bran Market report provides the main
region, market conditions with the product price, profit,
capacity, production, supply, demand and market growth rate and
forecast etc. De Oiled Rice Bran Market report also Present new project
SWOT analysis, investment feasibility analysis,
and investment return analysis.
Post Views: 1
Global Rice Starch Market
Analysis 2018 || Market Impact and Business Forecast
JUNE 29, 2018
Global Rice Starch Market look into Report 2018 to 2023 presents an inside and out
evaluation of the Global Rice Starch Market including sanctionative
innovations, key patterns, market drivers, challenges, institutionalization,
regulative scene, arrangement models, administrator contextual investigations,
openings, future guide, worth chain, biological system player profiles and
strategies. The report also introduces figures for Global Rice Starch
speculations from 2018 till 2023.
Global Rice Starch marketing
research Report 2018 offered by Intense Research contains a market outline of
the exchange that discussions with respect to the market measure, item scope,
market income, development openings, deals volumes and figures, development
estimation in returning years, momentum exchange pioneers and their
business/income measurements. The Global Rice Starch report Provide SWOT
examination to comprehend Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats of
the Global Rice Starch industry alongside Analysis additionally covers driving
providers on limit, business generation date, fabricating plants conveyance,
R&D Status, innovation sources, and crude materials sources.
Download Free PDF Sample Of Report
@ https://marketdesk.org/report/global-rice-starch-market-2018-hc/10503/#requestForSample
Global Rice Starch market
competition by Key Players, with production, price, revenue (value) and market:
BENEO
Ingredion
Bangkok starch
Thai Flour
AGRANA
WFM Wholesome Foods
Golden Agriculture
Anhui Lianhe
Anhui Le Huan Tian Biotechnology
Ingredion
Bangkok starch
Thai Flour
AGRANA
WFM Wholesome Foods
Golden Agriculture
Anhui Lianhe
Anhui Le Huan Tian Biotechnology
On the commence of an item, this
report shows the creation, income, value, market offer, and development rate of
each class, essentially split into:
Food Grade
Pharmaceutical Grade
Cosmetic Grade
Pharmaceutical Grade
Cosmetic Grade
On the introduce on the best
clients/applications, this report centers around the standing and viewpoint for
real applications/end clients, utilization (deals), market offer and
development rate of Global Rice Starch for each application, including a Market
portion, By:
Baked Goods & Bakery Fillings
Confectionery Coatings & Liquorice
Dairy Desserts & Yoghurt
Dairy Fruit Preparations
Body Powder
Dry Shampoo
Other
Confectionery Coatings & Liquorice
Dairy Desserts & Yoghurt
Dairy Fruit Preparations
Body Powder
Dry Shampoo
Other
Geographically, this report is divided into many key Regions, with production, consumption, revenue (million USD), market share and rate of Global Rice Starch in this region
(forecast), covering:
➥ Europe Rice Starch (France,
Russia, UK, Germany, and Italy).
➥ South America Rice Starch
(Brazil and Argentina).
➥ North America Rice Starch
(Mexico, Canada, and the USA).
➥ The Middle East and Africa Rice
Starch(Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Nigeria, and Egypt).
➥ Asia-Pacific Rice Starch
(China, South Korea, Thailand, India, Vietnam, Malaysia, Indonesia, Southeast
Asia, and Japan).
Ask For Discount On This Report
@ https://marketdesk.org/report/global-rice-starch-market-2018-hc/10503/#inquiry
Global Rice Starch Market Report
Provides Comprehensive Analysis as Following:
➤ Rice Starch Market fragments and
sub-sections.
➤ Rice Starch Market measure and
offers.
➤ Rice Starch Market patterns and
flow.
➤ Rice Starch Market Drivers and
Opportunities.
➤ Focused scene.
➤ Free market activity.
➤ Innovative developments in
Global Rice Starch exchange.
➤ Marketing Channel Development
Trend.
➤ Global Rice Starch Market
Positioning.
➤ Estimating Strategy.
➤ Brand Strategy.
➤ Target customer.
➤ Wholesalers/Traders List encased
in Positioning Global Rice Starch Market.
The Extent of Rice Starch Report: Global Rice Starch Market report assesses the extension
rate and in this manner, the esteem upheld market flow, the development causing
factors. The whole information depends on most recent exchange news, openings,
and patterns. The report contains a far-reaching marketing examination and
merchant scene moreover to a SWOT investigation of the key sellers.
Sections Divided In TOC(Table Of
Content) Includes:
Chapter 1. Industry Summary of Rice Starch Market.
Chapter 2. Global Market Size by Type and Application (2018-2023).
Chapter 3. Company Manufacturers Profiles.
Chapter 4. Global Rice Starch Market Competition Analysis by Players.
Chapter 5. The United States Development Status and Outlook.
Chapter 6. EU Market Development Status and Outlook.
Chapter 7. Japan Market Development Status and Outlook.
Chapter 8. China Market Development Status and Outlook.
Chapter 9. India Market Development Status and Outlook.
Chapter 10. Southeast Asia Market Development Status and Outlook.
Chapter 11. Rice Starch Market Forecast by Regions, Applications, and Types (2018-2023).
Chapter 12. Rice Starch Market Dynamics.
Chapter 13. Rice Starch Market Factors Analysis.
Chapter 14. Research Conclusions.
Chapter 15. Appendix.
Chapter 2. Global Market Size by Type and Application (2018-2023).
Chapter 3. Company Manufacturers Profiles.
Chapter 4. Global Rice Starch Market Competition Analysis by Players.
Chapter 5. The United States Development Status and Outlook.
Chapter 6. EU Market Development Status and Outlook.
Chapter 7. Japan Market Development Status and Outlook.
Chapter 8. China Market Development Status and Outlook.
Chapter 9. India Market Development Status and Outlook.
Chapter 10. Southeast Asia Market Development Status and Outlook.
Chapter 11. Rice Starch Market Forecast by Regions, Applications, and Types (2018-2023).
Chapter 12. Rice Starch Market Dynamics.
Chapter 13. Rice Starch Market Factors Analysis.
Chapter 14. Research Conclusions.
Chapter 15. Appendix.
To View Detail Overview Of TOC Click
Here @ https://marketdesk.org/report/global-rice-starch-market-2018-hc/10503/#toc
All in all, Global Rice Starch
market 2018 report shows the distinct investigation of the parent market upheld
tip top players, present, past and creative development learning which can work
a gainful guide for all the Global Rice Starch exchange contenders.
Get In Touch With Us:
420 Lexington Avenue Suite 300
New York City, NY 10170, United
States
USA/Canada Tel No: +1-857-2390696
Email: inquiry@market.biz
Competitive Intelligence on Organic Rice
Protein Consentrates Global Market with focus on (Dry form, Liquid form)
June 30, 2018
Salient
features of the Organic Rice Protein Consentrates Market Research Report
Geographically the leading manufacturers, exporters, and
retailers(if applicable) around the world are analyzed for this research
report. Below are the business entities covered in the report:
Axiom Foods, Inc.
AIDP, Inc.
Ricebran Technologies
Shaanxi Fuheng (FH)
Biotechnology Co., Ltd
Shafi Gluco-Chem (Pvt.) Ltd.
Bioway (Xi’an) Organic Ingredients Co., Ltd.
Golden Grain Group Limited
Ribus, Inc.
The Green Labs LLC
Top Health Ingredients Inc.
Axiom Foods, Inc.
AIDP, Inc.
Ricebran Technologies
Shaanxi Fuheng (FH)
Biotechnology Co., Ltd
Shafi Gluco-Chem (Pvt.) Ltd.
Bioway (Xi’an) Organic Ingredients Co., Ltd.
Golden Grain Group Limited
Ribus, Inc.
The Green Labs LLC
Top Health Ingredients Inc.
Geographically, this report studies the top producers and
consumers, focuses on product capacity, production, value, consumption, market
share and growth opportunity in these key regions, covering
North America
Europe
China
Japan
India
Southeast Asia
Other regions (Central & South America, Middle East & Africa)
North America
Europe
China
Japan
India
Southeast Asia
Other regions (Central & South America, Middle East & Africa)
The regional scope of the study is as follows:
North America
United States
Canada
Mexico
Asia-Pacific
China
India
Japan
South Korea
Australia
Indonesia
Singapore
Rest of Asia-Pacific
Europe
Germany
France
UK
Italy
Spain
Russia
Rest of Europe
Central & South America
Brazil
Argentina
Rest of South America
Middle East & Africa
Saudi Arabia
Turkey
Rest of Middle East & Africa
North America
United States
Canada
Mexico
Asia-Pacific
China
India
Japan
South Korea
Australia
Indonesia
Singapore
Rest of Asia-Pacific
Europe
Germany
France
UK
Italy
Spain
Russia
Rest of Europe
Central & South America
Brazil
Argentina
Rest of South America
Middle East & Africa
Saudi Arabia
Turkey
Rest of Middle East & Africa
On the basis of product, this report displays the production,
revenue, price, market share and growth rate of each type, primarily split into
Dry form
Liquid form
Dry form
Liquid form
By Application, the market can be split into
Sports & energy nutrition
Beverages
Bakery & confectionery
Meat analogs & extenders
Dairy alternatives
Others
Sports & energy nutrition
Beverages
Bakery & confectionery
Meat analogs & extenders
Dairy alternatives
Others
The study objectives of this report are:
To analyze and study the global Organic Rice Protein Consentrates capacity, production, value, consumption, status (2013-2017) and forecast (2018-2025);
Focuses on the key Organic Rice Protein Consentrates manufacturers, to study the capacity, production, value, market share and development plans in future.
Focuses on the global key manufacturers, to define, describe and analyze the market competition landscape, SWOT analysis.
To define, describe and forecast the market by type, application and region.
To analyze the global and key regions market potential and advantage, opportunity and challenge, restraints and risks.
To identify significant trends and factors driving or inhibiting the market growth.
To analyze the opportunities in the market for stakeholders by identifying the high growth segments.
To strategically analyze each submarket with respect to individual growth trend and their contribution to the market.
To analyze competitive developments such as expansions, agreements, new product launches, and acquisitions in the market.
To strategically profile the key players and comprehensively analyze their growth strategies.
To analyze and study the global Organic Rice Protein Consentrates capacity, production, value, consumption, status (2013-2017) and forecast (2018-2025);
Focuses on the key Organic Rice Protein Consentrates manufacturers, to study the capacity, production, value, market share and development plans in future.
Focuses on the global key manufacturers, to define, describe and analyze the market competition landscape, SWOT analysis.
To define, describe and forecast the market by type, application and region.
To analyze the global and key regions market potential and advantage, opportunity and challenge, restraints and risks.
To identify significant trends and factors driving or inhibiting the market growth.
To analyze the opportunities in the market for stakeholders by identifying the high growth segments.
To strategically analyze each submarket with respect to individual growth trend and their contribution to the market.
To analyze competitive developments such as expansions, agreements, new product launches, and acquisitions in the market.
To strategically profile the key players and comprehensively analyze their growth strategies.
In this study, the years considered to estimate the market size
of Organic Rice Protein Consentrates are as follows:
History Year: 2013-2017
Base Year: 2017
Estimated Year: 2018
Forecast Year 2018 to 2025
History Year: 2013-2017
Base Year: 2017
Estimated Year: 2018
Forecast Year 2018 to 2025
For the data information by
region, company, type and application, 2017 is considered as the base year.
Whenever data information was unavailable for the base year, the prior year has
been considered.
Key Stakeholders
Organic Rice Protein Consentrates Manufacturers
Organic Rice Protein Consentrates Distributors/Traders/Wholesalers
Organic Rice Protein Consentrates Subcomponent Manufacturers
Industry Association
Downstream Vendors
Organic Rice Protein Consentrates Manufacturers
Organic Rice Protein Consentrates Distributors/Traders/Wholesalers
Organic Rice Protein Consentrates Subcomponent Manufacturers
Industry Association
Downstream Vendors
Available Customizations
Regional and country-level analysis of the Organic Rice Protein
Consentrates market, by end-use.
Detailed analysis and profiles of additional market players.
Detailed analysis and profiles of additional market players.
Request sample pages @ https://www.trustedbusinessinsights.com/details/global-organic-rice-protein-consentrates-market-professional-survey-report-2018
Table of Content: Chapters and
Major Sections
Global Organic Rice Protein
Consentrates Market Professional Survey Report 2018
Chapter 1: Organic Rice Protein Consentrates Market Overview
Chapter 2: Organic Rice Protein Consentrates Competition by Players/Suppliers, Type and Application
Chapter 3: United States Organic Rice Protein Consentrates Market(Volume, Value and Sales Price)
Chapter 4: China Organic Rice Protein Consentrates Market(Volume, Value and Sales Price)
Chapter 5: Europe Organic Rice Protein Consentrates Market(Volume, Value and Sales Price)
Chapter 6: Japan Organic Rice Protein Consentrates Market(Volume, Value and Sales Price)
Chapter 7: Southeast Asia Organic Rice Protein Consentrates Market(Volume, Value and Sales Price)
Chapter 8: India Organic Rice Protein Consentrates Market(Volume, Value and Sales Price)
Chapter 9: Organic Rice Protein Consentrates Players/Suppliers Profiles and Sales Data
Chapter 10: Organic Rice Protein Consentrates Manufacturing Cost Analysis
Chapter 11: Industrial Chain, Sourcing Strategy and Downstream Buyers
Chapter 12: Marketing Strategy Analysis, Distributors/Traders
Chapter 13: Market Effect Factors Analysis
Chapter 14: Organic Rice Protein Consentrates Market Forecast (2018-2025)
Chapter 15: Research Findings and Conclusion
Chapter 16: Appendix
Chapter 2: Organic Rice Protein Consentrates Competition by Players/Suppliers, Type and Application
Chapter 3: United States Organic Rice Protein Consentrates Market(Volume, Value and Sales Price)
Chapter 4: China Organic Rice Protein Consentrates Market(Volume, Value and Sales Price)
Chapter 5: Europe Organic Rice Protein Consentrates Market(Volume, Value and Sales Price)
Chapter 6: Japan Organic Rice Protein Consentrates Market(Volume, Value and Sales Price)
Chapter 7: Southeast Asia Organic Rice Protein Consentrates Market(Volume, Value and Sales Price)
Chapter 8: India Organic Rice Protein Consentrates Market(Volume, Value and Sales Price)
Chapter 9: Organic Rice Protein Consentrates Players/Suppliers Profiles and Sales Data
Chapter 10: Organic Rice Protein Consentrates Manufacturing Cost Analysis
Chapter 11: Industrial Chain, Sourcing Strategy and Downstream Buyers
Chapter 12: Marketing Strategy Analysis, Distributors/Traders
Chapter 13: Market Effect Factors Analysis
Chapter 14: Organic Rice Protein Consentrates Market Forecast (2018-2025)
Chapter 15: Research Findings and Conclusion
Chapter 16: Appendix
Browse complete TOC @ https://www.trustedbusinessinsights.com/details/global-organic-rice-protein-consentrates-market-professional-survey-report-2018
TBI partners exclusively with
global publishers to provide clients single-point access to top-notch market
research. TBI’s repository is updated everyday to assist clients to be the
first in identifying the next trend by enabling access to competitive
intelligence, product, and service trends.
For any Inquiries
Fiona Clarke
100 Church Street, Suite 800, New York, 10007, USA
E-mail:Sales@TrustedBusinessInsights.com
Contact: +1-646-568-9797
Website: https://trustedbusinessinsights.com/
100 Church Street, Suite 800, New York, 10007, USA
E-mail:Sales@TrustedBusinessInsights.com
Contact: +1-646-568-9797
Website: https://trustedbusinessinsights.com/
June 30, 2018
EMEA (Europe, Middle East and Africa) Organic Rice Protein Market
Report 2018 is latest pipeline review
released by HTF MI to provides comprehensive information on the therapeutics
under development for EMEA (Europe, Middle East and Africa) Organic Rice
Protein, complete with analysis by stage of development, drug target, root
cause analysis ,mechanism of action (MoA), route of administration (RoA) and
molecule type.
Get Access to Sample PDF @:
https://www.htfmarketreport.com/sample-report/895664-emea-europe-middle-east-and-africa-organic-rice-protein-market-2
https://www.htfmarketreport.com/sample-report/895664-emea-europe-middle-east-and-africa-organic-rice-protein-market-2
If you are want to study the EMEA (Europe, Middle East and Africa)
Organic Rice Protein or intend to be, then this guide will provide you
comprehensive outlook. It’s vital for you to keep your knowledge up to date by
keeping research and development (R&D) of major players. If you have a
different set of players/manufacturers according to geography or needs regional
or country segmented reports we can provide requirement according to your
needs.
Key Players included in the
research study are Axiom Foods, Shafi Gluco Chem, AIDP, Jiangxi Yiwanjia
Organic Agricultural & OPW Ingredients.
Make inquiry before purchase @
https://www.htfmarketreport.com/enquiry-before-buy/895664-emea-europe-middle-east-and-africa-organic-rice-protein-market-2
https://www.htfmarketreport.com/enquiry-before-buy/895664-emea-europe-middle-east-and-africa-organic-rice-protein-market-2
The guide features dormant and
discontinued projects and covers therapeutics under Development by Companies
/Universities /Institutes, the molecules developed by Companies in Phase III,
Phase I, Preclinical and Discovery stages are 1, 1, 9 and 1 respectively.
Similarly, the Universities portfolio in Preclinical and Discovery stages
comprises 3 and 1 molecules, respectively.
EMEA (Europe, Middle East and
Africa) Organic Rice Protein pipeline guide helps in identifying and tracking
emerging and major players moves in the market and their portfolios, enhances
decision making capabilities and helps to create effective marketing strategies
to gain competitive advantage in health care and pharmaceuticals industry. The
guide covers the descriptive pharmacological action of the therapeutics, its
complete research and development history and latest news and press releases.
The data and information sourced from the databases, company/university
websites, clinical trial registries, conferences, SEC filings, investor
presentations and featured press releases from company/university sites and
industry-specific third party sources. Additionally, various dynamic tracking
processes ensure that the latest key developments are captured on a real time
basis.
Buy this research report @
https://www.htfmarketreport.com/buy-now?format=1&report=895664
https://www.htfmarketreport.com/buy-now?format=1&report=895664
Extracts of Chapters from EMEA (Europe, Middle East and Africa)
Organic Rice Protein Market Report 2018
Chapter 1 , to describe the definition , overview and Therapeutics Development of EMEA (Europe, Middle East and Africa) Organic Rice Protein.
Chapter2, to analyze the pipeline overview of companies, Universities/Institutes and the product development under by companies, Universities/Institutes.
Chapter3, Therapeutics Assessment of EMEA (Europe, Middle East and Africa) Organic Rice Protein by Target, Mechanism of Action, Route of Administration and by Molecule Type.
Chapter4, to display company profile involved in Therapeutics Development.
Chapter5, Drug profile product description, Mechanism of action and R&D Progress of EMEA (Europe, Middle East and Africa) Organic Rice Protein.
Chapter 6,7, to describe EMEA (Europe, Middle East and Africa) Organic Rice Protein Appendix, Methodology ,Coverage ,Secondary Research ,Primary Research ,Expert Panel Validation and Contact Us.
Chapter 1 , to describe the definition , overview and Therapeutics Development of EMEA (Europe, Middle East and Africa) Organic Rice Protein.
Chapter2, to analyze the pipeline overview of companies, Universities/Institutes and the product development under by companies, Universities/Institutes.
Chapter3, Therapeutics Assessment of EMEA (Europe, Middle East and Africa) Organic Rice Protein by Target, Mechanism of Action, Route of Administration and by Molecule Type.
Chapter4, to display company profile involved in Therapeutics Development.
Chapter5, Drug profile product description, Mechanism of action and R&D Progress of EMEA (Europe, Middle East and Africa) Organic Rice Protein.
Chapter 6,7, to describe EMEA (Europe, Middle East and Africa) Organic Rice Protein Appendix, Methodology ,Coverage ,Secondary Research ,Primary Research ,Expert Panel Validation and Contact Us.
Objective of this study
– To provides a snapshot of the global therapeutic landscape of
EMEA (Europe, Middle East and Africa) Organic Rice Protein.
– To reviews pipeline therapeutics for EMEA (Europe, Middle East and Africa) Organic Rice Protein by companies and universities/research institutes based on information derived from company and industry-specific sources.
– The pipeline guide covers pipeline products based on several stages of development ranging from pre-registration till discovery and undisclosed stages.
– The pipeline guide features descriptive drug profiles for the pipeline products which comprises, product description, descriptive licensing and collaboration details, R&D brief, MoA & other developmental activities.
– The pipeline guide reviews key companies involved in EMEA (Europe, Middle East and Africa) Organic Rice Protein therapeutics and enlists all their major and minor projects.
– The pipeline guide evaluates EMEA (Europe, Middle East and Africa) Organic Rice Protein therapeutics based on mechanism of action (MoA), drug target, route of administration (RoA) and molecule type.
– The guide encapsulates all the dormant and discontinued pipeline projects.
– The pipeline guide reviews latest news related to pipeline therapeutics for EMEA (Europe, Middle East and Africa) Organic Rice Protein
– To reviews pipeline therapeutics for EMEA (Europe, Middle East and Africa) Organic Rice Protein by companies and universities/research institutes based on information derived from company and industry-specific sources.
– The pipeline guide covers pipeline products based on several stages of development ranging from pre-registration till discovery and undisclosed stages.
– The pipeline guide features descriptive drug profiles for the pipeline products which comprises, product description, descriptive licensing and collaboration details, R&D brief, MoA & other developmental activities.
– The pipeline guide reviews key companies involved in EMEA (Europe, Middle East and Africa) Organic Rice Protein therapeutics and enlists all their major and minor projects.
– The pipeline guide evaluates EMEA (Europe, Middle East and Africa) Organic Rice Protein therapeutics based on mechanism of action (MoA), drug target, route of administration (RoA) and molecule type.
– The guide encapsulates all the dormant and discontinued pipeline projects.
– The pipeline guide reviews latest news related to pipeline therapeutics for EMEA (Europe, Middle East and Africa) Organic Rice Protein
Check for discount @
https://www.htfmarketreport.com/request-discount/895664-emea-europe-middle-east-and-africa-organic-rice-protein-market-2
https://www.htfmarketreport.com/request-discount/895664-emea-europe-middle-east-and-africa-organic-rice-protein-market-2
Reasons to buy
– Procure strategically important competitor information,
analysis, and insights to formulate effective R&D strategies.
– Recognize emerging players with potentially strong product portfolio and create effective counter-strategies to gain competitive advantage.
– Find and recognize significant and varied types of therapeutics under development for EMEA (Europe, Middle East and Africa) Organic Rice Protein.
– Classify potential new clients or partners in the target demographic.
– Develop tactical initiatives by understanding the focus areas of leading companies.
– Plan mergers and acquisitions meritoriously by identifying key players and it’s most promising pipeline therapeutics.
– Formulate corrective measures for pipeline projects by understanding EMEA (Europe, Middle East and Africa) Organic Rice Protein pipeline depth and focus of Indication therapeutics.
– Develop and design in-licensing and out-licensing strategies by identifying prospective partners with the most attractive projects to enhance and expand business potential and scope.
– Adjust the therapeutic portfolio by recognizing discontinued projects and understand from the know-how what drove them from pipeline.
– Recognize emerging players with potentially strong product portfolio and create effective counter-strategies to gain competitive advantage.
– Find and recognize significant and varied types of therapeutics under development for EMEA (Europe, Middle East and Africa) Organic Rice Protein.
– Classify potential new clients or partners in the target demographic.
– Develop tactical initiatives by understanding the focus areas of leading companies.
– Plan mergers and acquisitions meritoriously by identifying key players and it’s most promising pipeline therapeutics.
– Formulate corrective measures for pipeline projects by understanding EMEA (Europe, Middle East and Africa) Organic Rice Protein pipeline depth and focus of Indication therapeutics.
– Develop and design in-licensing and out-licensing strategies by identifying prospective partners with the most attractive projects to enhance and expand business potential and scope.
– Adjust the therapeutic portfolio by recognizing discontinued projects and understand from the know-how what drove them from pipeline.
Early buyers will receive 10% customization on reports. Read
Detailed Index of full Research Study at @
https://www.htfmarketreport.com/reports/895664-emea-europe-middle-east-and-africa-organic-rice-protein-market-2
https://www.htfmarketreport.com/reports/895664-emea-europe-middle-east-and-africa-organic-rice-protein-market-2
Thanks for reading this article;
you can also get individual chapter wise section or region wise report version
like North America, Europe or Asia.
About Author:
HTF Market Report is a wholly owned brand of HTF market Intelligence Consulting Private Limited. HTF Market Report global research and market intelligence consulting organization is uniquely positioned to not only identify growth opportunities but to also empower and inspire you to create visionary growth strategies for futures, enabled by our extraordinary depth and breadth of thought leadership, research, tools, events and experience that assist you for making goals into a reality. Our understanding of the interplay between industry convergence, Mega Trends, technologies and market trends provides our clients with new business models and expansion opportunities. We are focused on identifying the “Accurate Forecast” in every industry we cover so our clients can reap the benefits of being early market entrants and can accomplish their “Goals & Objectives”.
HTF Market Report is a wholly owned brand of HTF market Intelligence Consulting Private Limited. HTF Market Report global research and market intelligence consulting organization is uniquely positioned to not only identify growth opportunities but to also empower and inspire you to create visionary growth strategies for futures, enabled by our extraordinary depth and breadth of thought leadership, research, tools, events and experience that assist you for making goals into a reality. Our understanding of the interplay between industry convergence, Mega Trends, technologies and market trends provides our clients with new business models and expansion opportunities. We are focused on identifying the “Accurate Forecast” in every industry we cover so our clients can reap the benefits of being early market entrants and can accomplish their “Goals & Objectives”.
Contact US :
Craig Francis (PR & Marketing Manager)
HTF Market Intelligence Consulting Private Limited
Unit No. 429, Parsonage Road Edison, NJ
New Jersey USA – 08837
Phone: +1 (206) 317 1218
sales@htfmarketreport.com
Craig Francis (PR & Marketing Manager)
HTF Market Intelligence Consulting Private Limited
Unit No. 429, Parsonage Road Edison, NJ
New Jersey USA – 08837
Phone: +1 (206) 317 1218
sales@htfmarketreport.com
Connect with us at
https://www.linkedin.com/company/13388569/
https://www.facebook.com/htfmarketintelligence/
https://twitter.com/htfmarketreport
https://plus.google.com/u/0/+NidhiBhawsar-SEO_Expert?rel=author
https://www.linkedin.com/company/13388569/
https://www.facebook.com/htfmarketintelligence/
https://twitter.com/htfmarketreport
https://plus.google.com/u/0/+NidhiBhawsar-SEO_Expert?rel=author
Competitive Intelligence on Rice
Bran Oil Global Market with focus on (Made by Extraction, Made by Squeezing)
June 30, 2018
A new market research report titled Global Rice Bran Oil Market Professional Survey Report 2018 has
been added to the database of Trusted Business Insights (TBI).
In this report the Rice Bran Oil Market is valued (valuation provided in sample report)million in 2018
and is expected to reach USD (forecast provided in sample report) million by
end of 2025, growing at a CAGR of (percentage provided in sample report) annually
between 2018 and 2025.
Salient
features of the Rice Bran Oil Market Research Report
Geographically the leading manufacturers, exporters, and retailers(if
applicable) around the world are analyzed for this research report. Below are
the business entities covered in the report:
Ricela
Kamal
BCL
SVROil
Vaighai
A.P. Refinery
3F Industries
Sethia Oils
Jain Group of Industries
Shivangi Oils
Balgopal Food Products
King Rice Oil Group
Kasisuri
Surin Bran Oil
Agrotech International
Tsuno Rice Fine Chemicals
Oryza Oil & Fat Chemical
Wilmar International
Ricela
Kamal
BCL
SVROil
Vaighai
A.P. Refinery
3F Industries
Sethia Oils
Jain Group of Industries
Shivangi Oils
Balgopal Food Products
King Rice Oil Group
Kasisuri
Surin Bran Oil
Agrotech International
Tsuno Rice Fine Chemicals
Oryza Oil & Fat Chemical
Wilmar International
Geographically, this report studies the top producers and
consumers, focuses on product capacity, production, value, consumption, market
share and growth opportunity in these key regions, covering
North America
Europe
China
Japan
India
Southeast Asia
Other regions (Central & South America, Middle East & Africa)
North America
Europe
China
Japan
India
Southeast Asia
Other regions (Central & South America, Middle East & Africa)
The regional scope of the study is as follows:
North America
United States
Canada
Mexico
Asia-Pacific
China
India
Japan
South Korea
Australia
Indonesia
Singapore
Rest of Asia-Pacific
Europe
Germany
France
UK
Italy
Spain
Russia
Rest of Europe
Central & South America
Brazil
Argentina
Rest of South America
Middle East & Africa
Saudi Arabia
Turkey
Rest of Middle East & Africa
North America
United States
Canada
Mexico
Asia-Pacific
China
India
Japan
South Korea
Australia
Indonesia
Singapore
Rest of Asia-Pacific
Europe
Germany
France
UK
Italy
Spain
Russia
Rest of Europe
Central & South America
Brazil
Argentina
Rest of South America
Middle East & Africa
Saudi Arabia
Turkey
Rest of Middle East & Africa
On the basis of product, this report displays the production,
revenue, price, market share and growth rate of each type, primarily split into
Made by Extraction
Made by Squeezing
Made by Extraction
Made by Squeezing
By Application, the market can be split into
Food
Cosmetic
Industry
Food
Cosmetic
Industry
The study objectives of this report are:
To analyze and study the global Rice Bran Oil capacity, production, value, consumption, status (2013-2017) and forecast (2018-2025);
Focuses on the key Rice Bran Oil manufacturers, to study the capacity, production, value, market share and development plans in future.
Focuses on the global key manufacturers, to define, describe and analyze the market competition landscape, SWOT analysis.
To define, describe and forecast the market by type, application and region.
To analyze the global and key regions market potential and advantage, opportunity and challenge, restraints and risks.
To identify significant trends and factors driving or inhibiting the market growth.
To analyze the opportunities in the market for stakeholders by identifying the high growth segments.
To strategically analyze each submarket with respect to individual growth trend and their contribution to the market.
To analyze competitive developments such as expansions, agreements, new product launches, and acquisitions in the market.
To strategically profile the key players and comprehensively analyze their growth strategies.
To analyze and study the global Rice Bran Oil capacity, production, value, consumption, status (2013-2017) and forecast (2018-2025);
Focuses on the key Rice Bran Oil manufacturers, to study the capacity, production, value, market share and development plans in future.
Focuses on the global key manufacturers, to define, describe and analyze the market competition landscape, SWOT analysis.
To define, describe and forecast the market by type, application and region.
To analyze the global and key regions market potential and advantage, opportunity and challenge, restraints and risks.
To identify significant trends and factors driving or inhibiting the market growth.
To analyze the opportunities in the market for stakeholders by identifying the high growth segments.
To strategically analyze each submarket with respect to individual growth trend and their contribution to the market.
To analyze competitive developments such as expansions, agreements, new product launches, and acquisitions in the market.
To strategically profile the key players and comprehensively analyze their growth strategies.
In this study, the years considered to estimate the market size
of Rice Bran Oil are as follows:
History Year: 2013-2017
Base Year: 2017
Estimated Year: 2018
Forecast Year 2018 to 2025
History Year: 2013-2017
Base Year: 2017
Estimated Year: 2018
Forecast Year 2018 to 2025
For the data information by
region, company, type and application, 2017 is considered as the base year.
Whenever data information was unavailable for the base year, the prior year has
been considered.
Key Stakeholders
Rice Bran Oil Manufacturers
Rice Bran Oil Distributors/Traders/Wholesalers
Rice Bran Oil Subcomponent Manufacturers
Industry Association
Downstream Vendors
Rice Bran Oil Manufacturers
Rice Bran Oil Distributors/Traders/Wholesalers
Rice Bran Oil Subcomponent Manufacturers
Industry Association
Downstream Vendors
Available Customizations
Regional and country-level analysis of the Rice Bran Oil market,
by end-use.
Detailed analysis and profiles of additional market players.
Detailed analysis and profiles of additional market players.
Request sample pages @ https://www.trustedbusinessinsights.com/details/global-rice-bran-oil-market-professional-survey-report-2018
Table of Content: Chapters and
Major Sections
Global Rice Bran Oil Market
Professional Survey Report 2018
Chapter 1: Rice Bran Oil Market Overview
Chapter 2: Rice Bran Oil Competition by Players/Suppliers, Type and Application
Chapter 3: United States Rice Bran Oil Market(Volume, Value and Sales Price)
Chapter 4: China Rice Bran Oil Market(Volume, Value and Sales Price)
Chapter 5: Europe Rice Bran Oil Market(Volume, Value and Sales Price)
Chapter 6: Japan Rice Bran Oil Market(Volume, Value and Sales Price)
Chapter 7: Southeast Asia Rice Bran Oil Market(Volume, Value and Sales Price)
Chapter 8: India Rice Bran Oil Market(Volume, Value and Sales Price)
Chapter 9: Rice Bran Oil Players/Suppliers Profiles and Sales Data
Chapter 10: Rice Bran Oil Manufacturing Cost Analysis
Chapter 11: Industrial Chain, Sourcing Strategy and Downstream Buyers
Chapter 12: Marketing Strategy Analysis, Distributors/Traders
Chapter 13: Market Effect Factors Analysis
Chapter 14: Rice Bran Oil Market Forecast (2018-2025)
Chapter 15: Research Findings and Conclusion
Chapter 16: Appendix
Chapter 2: Rice Bran Oil Competition by Players/Suppliers, Type and Application
Chapter 3: United States Rice Bran Oil Market(Volume, Value and Sales Price)
Chapter 4: China Rice Bran Oil Market(Volume, Value and Sales Price)
Chapter 5: Europe Rice Bran Oil Market(Volume, Value and Sales Price)
Chapter 6: Japan Rice Bran Oil Market(Volume, Value and Sales Price)
Chapter 7: Southeast Asia Rice Bran Oil Market(Volume, Value and Sales Price)
Chapter 8: India Rice Bran Oil Market(Volume, Value and Sales Price)
Chapter 9: Rice Bran Oil Players/Suppliers Profiles and Sales Data
Chapter 10: Rice Bran Oil Manufacturing Cost Analysis
Chapter 11: Industrial Chain, Sourcing Strategy and Downstream Buyers
Chapter 12: Marketing Strategy Analysis, Distributors/Traders
Chapter 13: Market Effect Factors Analysis
Chapter 14: Rice Bran Oil Market Forecast (2018-2025)
Chapter 15: Research Findings and Conclusion
Chapter 16: Appendix
Browse complete TOC @ https://www.trustedbusinessinsights.com/details/global-rice-bran-oil-market-professional-survey-report-2018
TBI partners exclusively with
global publishers to provide clients single-point access to top-notch market
research. TBI’s repository is updated everyday to assist clients to be the
first in identifying the next trend by enabling access to competitive
intelligence, product, and service trends.
For any Inquiries
Fiona Clarke
100 Church Street, Suite 800, New York, 10007, USA
E-mail:Sales@TrustedBusinessInsights.com
Contact: +1-646-568-9797
Website: https://trustedbusinessinsights.com/
100 Church Street, Suite 800, New York, 10007, USA
E-mail:Sales@TrustedBusinessInsights.com
Contact: +1-646-568-9797
Website: https://trustedbusinessinsights.com/
From rice paddies to research
paradise
After years of
planning, Seoul’s M Valley is now open for business
July 02,2018
Left,
Kolon’s Future Research Park and LG’s Science Park, right, in Magok-dong,
western Seoul. [CHOI JOON-HO]
|
Magok-dong,
an area nestled just east of Gimpo International Airport in Gangseo District,
western Seoul, was home to Seoul’s last rice paddies in the early 2000s. Today,
it’s touted as Korea’s Silicon Valley with tens of thousands of the country’s
brightest scientists and researchers working in the area every day.
The so-called M Valley now houses some of Korea’s most renowned companies and research firms. It follows in the footsteps of Teheran-ro in Gangnam District, southern Seuol, and Pangyo-dong in Seongnam, Gyeonggi, as a rising R&D hub, but surpasses both in size, spanning 366.5 hectares (905.6 acres).
In April, LG opened the LG Science Park in M Valley. The Science Park houses 20,000 employees from eight affiliates, including LG Electronics, and measures 170,000 square meters (42 acres).
Kolon - a conglomerate with businesses in various fields including technology and clothing - opened its Future Research Park in April as well, with 1,000 employees from three of its affiliates working at the new facility. Lotte Group also moved its R&D center from Yeongdeungpo District, western Seoul, to M Valley, expanding it five times in the process.
Nexen Tire, fashion and retail conglomerate E-Land Group and heating and air conditioning firm Kiturami are all in the process of setting up offices in M Valley. Foreign companies like Saudi-owned oil refinery S-Oil, Japanese textile firm Toray Industries and U.S. biopharmaceutical company Wells Bio are also moving into the area.
According to the Seoul Metropolitan Government, a total of 136 companies - 46 conglomerates and 90 small and mid-size enterprises (SMEs)- have confirmed that they will open offices or have already moved into M Valley. The city government oversees the development of the Future City MAGOK, M Valley’s official English name.
The city government is also building facilities to help grow start-ups and SMEs. By 2022, the Seoul government plans to complete the construction of a support center providing legal and marketing services for companies moving into Magok, as well as government-subsidized apartments to provide low-cost accommodation for start-up founders.
“If talented individuals from various companies and research centers gather in one place,” said Han Sung-soo, chairman of Kolon’s Future Research Park, “it will bring about a virtuous cycle of entrepreneurship, investments and mergers and acquisitions.”
The so-called M Valley now houses some of Korea’s most renowned companies and research firms. It follows in the footsteps of Teheran-ro in Gangnam District, southern Seuol, and Pangyo-dong in Seongnam, Gyeonggi, as a rising R&D hub, but surpasses both in size, spanning 366.5 hectares (905.6 acres).
In April, LG opened the LG Science Park in M Valley. The Science Park houses 20,000 employees from eight affiliates, including LG Electronics, and measures 170,000 square meters (42 acres).
Kolon - a conglomerate with businesses in various fields including technology and clothing - opened its Future Research Park in April as well, with 1,000 employees from three of its affiliates working at the new facility. Lotte Group also moved its R&D center from Yeongdeungpo District, western Seoul, to M Valley, expanding it five times in the process.
Nexen Tire, fashion and retail conglomerate E-Land Group and heating and air conditioning firm Kiturami are all in the process of setting up offices in M Valley. Foreign companies like Saudi-owned oil refinery S-Oil, Japanese textile firm Toray Industries and U.S. biopharmaceutical company Wells Bio are also moving into the area.
According to the Seoul Metropolitan Government, a total of 136 companies - 46 conglomerates and 90 small and mid-size enterprises (SMEs)- have confirmed that they will open offices or have already moved into M Valley. The city government oversees the development of the Future City MAGOK, M Valley’s official English name.
The city government is also building facilities to help grow start-ups and SMEs. By 2022, the Seoul government plans to complete the construction of a support center providing legal and marketing services for companies moving into Magok, as well as government-subsidized apartments to provide low-cost accommodation for start-up founders.
“If talented individuals from various companies and research centers gather in one place,” said Han Sung-soo, chairman of Kolon’s Future Research Park, “it will bring about a virtuous cycle of entrepreneurship, investments and mergers and acquisitions.”
Magok-dong’s strategic location makes it an attractive
destination.
M Valley is highly accessible via public transport, as metro lines No. 5 and 9 and the Incheon Airport Railroad all pass through the district. Gimpo International Airport is also just two stops away on line No. 5, and the Olympic Highway, which extends all the way east to Gangnam District, also runs through the valley.
Situated just across the Han River is Digital Media City, Seoul’s broadcast and media technology hub. Korea’s largest exhibition center Kintex at Goyang, Gyeonggi, is only a 30-minute drive away, and Yeouido, the financial hub of Seoul, is only a little over 10 kilometers (6.2 miles) away.
Another feature that adds to Magok’s appeal is the planned opening of the Seoul Botanical Garden in the valley this October. The Seoul government is now putting the finishing touches to the 50.3-hectare park, which will contain 5,000 different kinds of plants as well as an artificial lake. The garden will be twice as large as Yeouido Park in western Seoul.
Developing M Valley wasn’t always straightforward.
The idea to transform Seoul’s last rice paddies into an R&D hub was first raised in December 2005 by former President Lee Myung-bak who was then serving as Seoul mayor.
At the time, the city government tried to attract prestigious domestic and foreign research firms and universities to Magok. Despite Lee’s wishes, only a handful of foreign companies, like Japan’s Toray, confirmed that they would move into the district.
Lee’s immediate successor Oh Se-hoon - also from the conservative party - further expanded on Lee’s dreams and proposed a “Han River renaissance” plan in 2007, creating a 98-acre artificial lake in Magok out of water drawn from the Han. He planned to line up research centers, convention centers and hotels around the lake.
The construction of the M Valley began in September 2009. But as the global financial crisis of 2008 stirred economic unrest in Korea, Oh had to scrap his plan for a giant lake as residents protested amid concerns over the wisdom of using tax money to finance such extravagant projects. Instead, he settled for a more modest 49-acre lake and a park. The Seoul government also offered companies cheap real estate and tax benefits.
In 2012, the Seoul government succeeded in persuading LG to commit to building its R&D center in M Valley. Unlike Samsung or Hyundai, which already had many of their research centers concentrated in Gyeonggi, LG had its R&D offices scattered across Seoul.
Though incumbent Democratic Party Mayor Park Won-soon’s political ideologies may have differed from his two immediate predecessors when he took office in 2011, he continued to push forward with the Magok R&D project and came up with the idea of the Seoul Botanical Garden. During his successful bid for a third term in the provincial elections last month, Park reaffirmed his determination to develop the M Valley with promises to nurture SMEs and new businesses there.
“Lee Myung-bak sowed the first seeds of Magok’s R&D hub and passed it onto Oh Se-hoon,” said Shin Chang-ho, a professor of urban planning and design at the University of Seoul. “Park Won-soon is now making the flower grow. Like the M Valley, R&D that promotes the economy should move forward without stumbling over politics.”
BY CHOI JOON-HO [kim.eunjin1@joongang.co.kr]
M Valley is highly accessible via public transport, as metro lines No. 5 and 9 and the Incheon Airport Railroad all pass through the district. Gimpo International Airport is also just two stops away on line No. 5, and the Olympic Highway, which extends all the way east to Gangnam District, also runs through the valley.
Situated just across the Han River is Digital Media City, Seoul’s broadcast and media technology hub. Korea’s largest exhibition center Kintex at Goyang, Gyeonggi, is only a 30-minute drive away, and Yeouido, the financial hub of Seoul, is only a little over 10 kilometers (6.2 miles) away.
Another feature that adds to Magok’s appeal is the planned opening of the Seoul Botanical Garden in the valley this October. The Seoul government is now putting the finishing touches to the 50.3-hectare park, which will contain 5,000 different kinds of plants as well as an artificial lake. The garden will be twice as large as Yeouido Park in western Seoul.
Developing M Valley wasn’t always straightforward.
The idea to transform Seoul’s last rice paddies into an R&D hub was first raised in December 2005 by former President Lee Myung-bak who was then serving as Seoul mayor.
At the time, the city government tried to attract prestigious domestic and foreign research firms and universities to Magok. Despite Lee’s wishes, only a handful of foreign companies, like Japan’s Toray, confirmed that they would move into the district.
Lee’s immediate successor Oh Se-hoon - also from the conservative party - further expanded on Lee’s dreams and proposed a “Han River renaissance” plan in 2007, creating a 98-acre artificial lake in Magok out of water drawn from the Han. He planned to line up research centers, convention centers and hotels around the lake.
The construction of the M Valley began in September 2009. But as the global financial crisis of 2008 stirred economic unrest in Korea, Oh had to scrap his plan for a giant lake as residents protested amid concerns over the wisdom of using tax money to finance such extravagant projects. Instead, he settled for a more modest 49-acre lake and a park. The Seoul government also offered companies cheap real estate and tax benefits.
In 2012, the Seoul government succeeded in persuading LG to commit to building its R&D center in M Valley. Unlike Samsung or Hyundai, which already had many of their research centers concentrated in Gyeonggi, LG had its R&D offices scattered across Seoul.
Though incumbent Democratic Party Mayor Park Won-soon’s political ideologies may have differed from his two immediate predecessors when he took office in 2011, he continued to push forward with the Magok R&D project and came up with the idea of the Seoul Botanical Garden. During his successful bid for a third term in the provincial elections last month, Park reaffirmed his determination to develop the M Valley with promises to nurture SMEs and new businesses there.
“Lee Myung-bak sowed the first seeds of Magok’s R&D hub and passed it onto Oh Se-hoon,” said Shin Chang-ho, a professor of urban planning and design at the University of Seoul. “Park Won-soon is now making the flower grow. Like the M Valley, R&D that promotes the economy should move forward without stumbling over politics.”
BY CHOI JOON-HO [kim.eunjin1@joongang.co.kr]
Organic brown
rice syrups launch in the United States
06.29.2018
The syrups are certified organic, kosher and Non-GMO Project
verified. Ciranda will distribute them in the U.S. market beginning Q3 2018 and
plans to scale-up during the next three years. The rice syrups expand Ciranda’s
current sweetener portfolio, which includes organic tapioca glucose and
fructose syrups, organic honey, organic agave syrup and inulin, as well as
organic crystalline grape sugars.
Matco has more than 50 years of experience in the rice industry
and recently added a syrup processing facility for further advancement. A
member of the Sustainable Rice Platform, the company initiated the Kisan Dost
(Farmer’s Friend) Program to create a solution for rice growers struggling to
market products without the use of a marketing consultant, who might use unfair
market pricing and commission a portion of the profit.
The Farmer’s Friend program seeks to provide direct procurement
and opportunities for farmers to improve yield with no-cost services, which
include laser land leveling, soil and water testing, crop monitoring, fair
pricing and certified seeds. More than 500 farmers have been affected by the
program.
“We have a long history of ethical sourcing,” said Steve Hyde,
director of business development, Ciranda. “We partner with suppliers who share
our values for sustainability and fair-trade practices, and Matco is certainly
in alignment. With this new partnership we are able to offer our clients a
high-quality source of glucose, while at the same time contributing to the
development of rice growers in the rice belt of Pakistan.”
Can lentils
lower blood sugar levels after a meal?
By Alena Kim
June 29, 2018
Our
Reader Score
Researchers investigated whether replacing
carbohydrates from white rice and potatoes with lentils lowered blood glucose
levels after a meal.
Methods to control blood sugar levels have been receiving a lot
of attention due to its importance in treating and preventing type 2 diabetes.
Drastic changes and high peaks in blood glucose levels strain the body’s
ability to produce insulin. Insulin is responsible for bringing blood glucose
down to normal levels, and its production is altered in diabetes. Thus,
glycemic control is the aim of dietary interventions in the treatment of type 2 diabetes.
Glycemic index
and blood glucose
The glycemic index (GI) for foods measures a food’s ability to
affect blood glucose levels after consumption. Foods with a high glycemic
index, like potatoes and white rice, create a spike in the blood glucose levels
after a meal. Foods with a low glycemic index, like seeds and legumes,
have little effect on blood glucose levels.
Previous studies have shown that eating foods in the “pulse”
category (beans, peas, lentils) is associated with a long-term glycemic
control. Lentil is a type of pulse that has slowly digesting starch, low
hydrolysis rate, high protein, and a lower predicted glycemic index among other
pulses such as chickpeas.
Canadian researchers investigated how post-meal blood glucose
would change if a portion of high-glycemic foods, such as potatoes and white
rice, were replaced with lentils. Their findings were recently published in Journal of Nutrition.
For the study, they only replaced half the serving of potatoes
and white rice with lentils to make sure the amounts of lentils consumed were
realistic. They recruited two groups of 24 healthy adult volunteers in the
study. They split the participants into potato and rice groups. The
participants attended five three-hour morning study visits, where they consumed
the study meals. The meals consisted of white rice only, potatoes only, white
rice + lentils, and potatoes + lentils. They used three types of lentils: large
green, small green, and split red. The researchers took blood samples to
analyze the glucose and insulin levels.
Lentils
lowered post-meal blood glucose and insulin
The results showed that replacing half of the rice and potatoes
with lentils resulted in lowered post-meal blood glucose. This was true for all
three types of lentils. The relative glycemic response was lowered by around
20% for rice + lentils, and 35% for potato + lentils when compared with each
carbohydrate alone. Plasma insulin levels were lowered only in the potato +
lentil.
The authors could not find the biomechanical explanation for how
lentil consumption lowered post-meal blood glucose, but it was definitely not
due to excessive insulin production.
Overall, the study found that replacing a portion of
high-glycemic foods such as white rice and potatoes with a low-glycemic pulse
such as lentils is effective in controlling blood glucose levels after a meal.
This finding can help control blood sugar levels for those with diabetes. It can
also help in preventing diabetes development by controlling insulin production
in the long-term. The researchers suggest that future studies could repeat the
study on subjects with diabetes to see if the ratio of carbohydrate replacement
is also effective in the diabetic population.
Written by Alena Kim, HBSc
Reference: Moravek, D., Duncan, A. M., Vandersluis, L. B.,
Turkstra, S. J., Rogers, E. J., Wilson, J. M., Hawke, A., Ramdath, D. D.
(2018). Carbohydrate Replacement of Rice or Potato with Lentils Reduces the
Postprandial Glycemic Response in Healthy Adults in an Acute, Randomized,
Crossover Trial. The
Journal of Nutrition, (148), 535-541. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/nxy018.
IFAD distributes farm inputs to rice, cassava farmers in Ogun
ON JUNE 30, 20184:47 PMIN AGRIC0 COMMENTS
Farmers at work The International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD)
Assisted-Value Chain Development Programme (VCDP), on Saturday distributed farm
inputs to 1,500 rice and cassava value chain farmers toward the success of 2018
planting season. The Commissioner for Agriculture, Mrs Adepeju Adebajo said
while inaugurating the distribution input in Owode Local Government Area of the
state, said the input distribution would help the farmers boost production. The
commissioner, who was represented by the Permanent Secretary in the ministry,
Mr Olatunbosun Mosuro, also expressed optimism that the inputs would assist
farmers meet the challenges of food security. Adebajo said that the
beneficiaries were selected from five local government areas: Obafemi/ Owode,
Yewa North, Ijebu North East, Ijebu East,and Ifo. She added said that the
implementation of the programme was in line with the objective of Agricultural
Promotion Policy(APP) and the National Economic Recovery and Growth Plan. “The
objective is to catalyse a market-led value added production, processing and
marketing of rice and cassava commodities and other products by smallholders
farmers,“ she said. The commissioner explained that the objective of the
programme would be achieved “through the adoption of best practices and
innovations that increase efficiencies of value chain of the commodities.
“
She also said that youths would be attracted to farming and gender
inclusiveness ensured through the programme. Adebajo noted that the programme
was also in line with the mission of the present administration to rebuild
Ogun. The commissioner disclosed that since the inception of the FGN/IFAD/VCDP,
over 6,000 farmers had been supported with inputs to cultivate 7,000 hectres of
rice and cassava across the five participating local governments. She added
that the VCDP support to farmers had impacted positively on their productivity,
adding that the average yield of cassava from 2015 increased from 10.1 metric
tonnes per hecter to 25 metric tonnes per hectre in 2017. The commissioner also
disclosed that rice production increased from N1.6 metric tonnes per hectres to
4.4 metric tonnes per hectres within the same periods. She, however, appealed
to the farmers concerned to judiciously utilise the inputs for them to achieve
higher productivity. The commissioner said that the state government was
determined to ensure food security in the state. The Ogun Coordinator of VCDP,
Mr Samual Adeogun, said the motive behind the distribution of the input was to
provide farmers with the value chains to increase their productivity. According
to him, the rice and cassava value chain is FGN/IFAD support programme. Adeogun
said the input distributed consisted of fertiliser and herbicides, adding that
farmers would pay 50 per cent and while government subsidised 50 per cent of
the payment. He said that the objective of the FGN/ IFAD/ VCDP was also to
increase income and productivity as well as boost food security among small
holder farmers who engaged in rice and cassava value chain. “Our strategy is to
work with farmers who are cultivating less than five hectres. “We also want to
work with youths and women involved in cassava and rice value chain who involve
in the production, processing and marketing, “The FGN/ IFAD programme is
expected to have 5,000 farmers but we have over 7,000 farmers across the five
participating local governments in the state,” he said. He advised the farmers
to make use of the inputs effectively on their farm land in order to improve
their yields. Mr Johnson Ajibola and Mrs Lola Adeola, who spoke on behalf of
the beneficiaries, commended government and IFAD-VCDP for their support. They
promised that they would make effective use of the inputs, in their farms, to
boost food production. They also promised to apply the skills they were taught
during the pre-season training to boost agriculture in the state
Read
more at: https://www.vanguardngr.com/2018/06/ifad-distributes-farm-inputs-rice-cassava-farmers-ogun/
From rice paddies to research
paradise
After years of
planning, Seoul’s M Valley is now open for business
July 02,2018
Left,
Kolon’s Future Research Park and LG’s Science Park, right, in Magok-dong,
western Seoul. [CHOI JOON-HO]
|
Magok-dong,
an area nestled just east of Gimpo International Airport in Gangseo District,
western Seoul, was home to Seoul’s last rice paddies in the early 2000s. Today,
it’s touted as Korea’s Silicon Valley with tens of thousands of the country’s
brightest scientists and researchers working in the area every day.
The so-called M Valley now houses some of Korea’s most renowned companies and research firms. It follows in the footsteps of Teheran-ro in Gangnam District, southern Seuol, and Pangyo-dong in Seongnam, Gyeonggi, as a rising R&D hub, but surpasses both in size, spanning 366.5 hectares (905.6 acres).
In April, LG opened the LG Science Park in M Valley. The Science Park houses 20,000 employees from eight affiliates, including LG Electronics, and measures 170,000 square meters (42 acres).
Kolon - a conglomerate with businesses in various fields including technology and clothing - opened its Future Research Park in April as well, with 1,000 employees from three of its affiliates working at the new facility. Lotte Group also moved its R&D center from Yeongdeungpo District, western Seoul, to M Valley, expanding it five times in the process.
Nexen Tire, fashion and retail conglomerate E-Land Group and heating and air conditioning firm Kiturami are all in the process of setting up offices in M Valley. Foreign companies like Saudi-owned oil refinery S-Oil, Japanese textile firm Toray Industries and U.S. biopharmaceutical company Wells Bio are also moving into the area.
According to the Seoul Metropolitan Government, a total of 136 companies - 46 conglomerates and 90 small and mid-size enterprises (SMEs)- have confirmed that they will open offices or have already moved into M Valley. The city government oversees the development of the Future City MAGOK, M Valley’s official English name.
The city government is also building facilities to help grow start-ups and SMEs. By 2022, the Seoul government plans to complete the construction of a support center providing legal and marketing services for companies moving into Magok, as well as government-subsidized apartments to provide low-cost accommodation for start-up founders.
“If talented individuals from various companies and research centers gather in one place,” said Han Sung-soo, chairman of Kolon’s Future Research Park, “it will bring about a virtuous cycle of entrepreneurship, investments and mergers and acquisitions.”
The so-called M Valley now houses some of Korea’s most renowned companies and research firms. It follows in the footsteps of Teheran-ro in Gangnam District, southern Seuol, and Pangyo-dong in Seongnam, Gyeonggi, as a rising R&D hub, but surpasses both in size, spanning 366.5 hectares (905.6 acres).
In April, LG opened the LG Science Park in M Valley. The Science Park houses 20,000 employees from eight affiliates, including LG Electronics, and measures 170,000 square meters (42 acres).
Kolon - a conglomerate with businesses in various fields including technology and clothing - opened its Future Research Park in April as well, with 1,000 employees from three of its affiliates working at the new facility. Lotte Group also moved its R&D center from Yeongdeungpo District, western Seoul, to M Valley, expanding it five times in the process.
Nexen Tire, fashion and retail conglomerate E-Land Group and heating and air conditioning firm Kiturami are all in the process of setting up offices in M Valley. Foreign companies like Saudi-owned oil refinery S-Oil, Japanese textile firm Toray Industries and U.S. biopharmaceutical company Wells Bio are also moving into the area.
According to the Seoul Metropolitan Government, a total of 136 companies - 46 conglomerates and 90 small and mid-size enterprises (SMEs)- have confirmed that they will open offices or have already moved into M Valley. The city government oversees the development of the Future City MAGOK, M Valley’s official English name.
The city government is also building facilities to help grow start-ups and SMEs. By 2022, the Seoul government plans to complete the construction of a support center providing legal and marketing services for companies moving into Magok, as well as government-subsidized apartments to provide low-cost accommodation for start-up founders.
“If talented individuals from various companies and research centers gather in one place,” said Han Sung-soo, chairman of Kolon’s Future Research Park, “it will bring about a virtuous cycle of entrepreneurship, investments and mergers and acquisitions.”
Magok-dong’s strategic location makes it an attractive
destination.
M Valley is highly accessible via public transport, as metro lines No. 5 and 9 and the Incheon Airport Railroad all pass through the district. Gimpo International Airport is also just two stops away on line No. 5, and the Olympic Highway, which extends all the way east to Gangnam District, also runs through the valley.
Situated just across the Han River is Digital Media City, Seoul’s broadcast and media technology hub. Korea’s largest exhibition center Kintex at Goyang, Gyeonggi, is only a 30-minute drive away, and Yeouido, the financial hub of Seoul, is only a little over 10 kilometers (6.2 miles) away.
Another feature that adds to Magok’s appeal is the planned opening of the Seoul Botanical Garden in the valley this October. The Seoul government is now putting the finishing touches to the 50.3-hectare park, which will contain 5,000 different kinds of plants as well as an artificial lake. The garden will be twice as large as Yeouido Park in western Seoul.
Developing M Valley wasn’t always straightforward.
The idea to transform Seoul’s last rice paddies into an R&D hub was first raised in December 2005 by former President Lee Myung-bak who was then serving as Seoul mayor.
At the time, the city government tried to attract prestigious domestic and foreign research firms and universities to Magok. Despite Lee’s wishes, only a handful of foreign companies, like Japan’s Toray, confirmed that they would move into the district.
Lee’s immediate successor Oh Se-hoon - also from the conservative party - further expanded on Lee’s dreams and proposed a “Han River renaissance” plan in 2007, creating a 98-acre artificial lake in Magok out of water drawn from the Han. He planned to line up research centers, convention centers and hotels around the lake.
The construction of the M Valley began in September 2009. But as the global financial crisis of 2008 stirred economic unrest in Korea, Oh had to scrap his plan for a giant lake as residents protested amid concerns over the wisdom of using tax money to finance such extravagant projects. Instead, he settled for a more modest 49-acre lake and a park. The Seoul government also offered companies cheap real estate and tax benefits.
In 2012, the Seoul government succeeded in persuading LG to commit to building its R&D center in M Valley. Unlike Samsung or Hyundai, which already had many of their research centers concentrated in Gyeonggi, LG had its R&D offices scattered across Seoul.
Though incumbent Democratic Party Mayor Park Won-soon’s political ideologies may have differed from his two immediate predecessors when he took office in 2011, he continued to push forward with the Magok R&D project and came up with the idea of the Seoul Botanical Garden. During his successful bid for a third term in the provincial elections last month, Park reaffirmed his determination to develop the M Valley with promises to nurture SMEs and new businesses there.
“Lee Myung-bak sowed the first seeds of Magok’s R&D hub and passed it onto Oh Se-hoon,” said Shin Chang-ho, a professor of urban planning and design at the University of Seoul. “Park Won-soon is now making the flower grow. Like the M Valley, R&D that promotes the economy should move forward without stumbling over politics.”
BY CHOI JOON-HO [kim.eunjin1@joongang.co.kr]
M Valley is highly accessible via public transport, as metro lines No. 5 and 9 and the Incheon Airport Railroad all pass through the district. Gimpo International Airport is also just two stops away on line No. 5, and the Olympic Highway, which extends all the way east to Gangnam District, also runs through the valley.
Situated just across the Han River is Digital Media City, Seoul’s broadcast and media technology hub. Korea’s largest exhibition center Kintex at Goyang, Gyeonggi, is only a 30-minute drive away, and Yeouido, the financial hub of Seoul, is only a little over 10 kilometers (6.2 miles) away.
Another feature that adds to Magok’s appeal is the planned opening of the Seoul Botanical Garden in the valley this October. The Seoul government is now putting the finishing touches to the 50.3-hectare park, which will contain 5,000 different kinds of plants as well as an artificial lake. The garden will be twice as large as Yeouido Park in western Seoul.
Developing M Valley wasn’t always straightforward.
The idea to transform Seoul’s last rice paddies into an R&D hub was first raised in December 2005 by former President Lee Myung-bak who was then serving as Seoul mayor.
At the time, the city government tried to attract prestigious domestic and foreign research firms and universities to Magok. Despite Lee’s wishes, only a handful of foreign companies, like Japan’s Toray, confirmed that they would move into the district.
Lee’s immediate successor Oh Se-hoon - also from the conservative party - further expanded on Lee’s dreams and proposed a “Han River renaissance” plan in 2007, creating a 98-acre artificial lake in Magok out of water drawn from the Han. He planned to line up research centers, convention centers and hotels around the lake.
The construction of the M Valley began in September 2009. But as the global financial crisis of 2008 stirred economic unrest in Korea, Oh had to scrap his plan for a giant lake as residents protested amid concerns over the wisdom of using tax money to finance such extravagant projects. Instead, he settled for a more modest 49-acre lake and a park. The Seoul government also offered companies cheap real estate and tax benefits.
In 2012, the Seoul government succeeded in persuading LG to commit to building its R&D center in M Valley. Unlike Samsung or Hyundai, which already had many of their research centers concentrated in Gyeonggi, LG had its R&D offices scattered across Seoul.
Though incumbent Democratic Party Mayor Park Won-soon’s political ideologies may have differed from his two immediate predecessors when he took office in 2011, he continued to push forward with the Magok R&D project and came up with the idea of the Seoul Botanical Garden. During his successful bid for a third term in the provincial elections last month, Park reaffirmed his determination to develop the M Valley with promises to nurture SMEs and new businesses there.
“Lee Myung-bak sowed the first seeds of Magok’s R&D hub and passed it onto Oh Se-hoon,” said Shin Chang-ho, a professor of urban planning and design at the University of Seoul. “Park Won-soon is now making the flower grow. Like the M Valley, R&D that promotes the economy should move forward without stumbling over politics.”
BY CHOI JOON-HO [kim.eunjin1@joongang.co.kr]
Systemic
pesticides and their threats to humans, environment
Hijo
Resources Corporation CEO Rosanna Tuason Fores
A
portion of those who attended.
Task
Force Systemic Pesticides (TFSP) chair Maarten Bijleveld van Lexmond of
Neuchatel, Switzerland.
Hijo
Resources Corporation CEO Rosanna Tuason Fores
A
portion of those who attended.
Task
Force Systemic Pesticides (TFSP) chair Maarten Bijleveld van Lexmond of
Neuchatel, Switzerland.
Hijo
Resources Corporation CEO Rosanna Tuason Fores
DAVAO Region, being a
predominantly agricultural region despite its growing commercial and industrial
sectors, will always be in the midst of a debate of the benefits and
disadvantages of doing without pesticides, particularly systemic pesticides.
Systemic pesticides are described as pesticides that you cannot wash off. Once sprayed, it is absorbed by the plant and "moves around in its tissues". Thus, it not only poses risks to human health but also to biodiversity and ecosystems.
Top on the list are Neonicotinoids or Neonics, which has been linked to the steep decline of bees, which in turn affects pollination and a lot of other side effects. Neonics are widely used worldwide for seed and soil treatments, foliar sprays, turf products, flea treatments for pests and lawn care. In short, it's everywhere.
Thus the gathering last June 27, 2018 at Apo View Hotel of over a 150 participants from the academe, agriculture and aquatic sectors, and international scientists in the 2018 International Scientific Symposium organized by the Task Force on Systemic Pesticides (TFSP) and University of Southeastern Philippines (Usep), in collaboration with the Hijo Resources Corporation (HRC), Southern Mindanao Agriculture, Aquatic, and Natural Resources Research Development Consortium (Smaaarrdec), Davao Oriental State College of Science and Technology (DOSCST), Conservation Center of the Philippine Islands Initiative Inc., and the De La Salle Family Life and Wellness Institute at Apo View Hotel.
On its website, TFSP describes itself as "the response of the scientific community to concern around the impact of systemic pesticides on biodiversity and ecosystems. Its intention is to provide the definitive view of science to inform more rapid and improved decision-making." It was represented in the symposium by its chair, Maarten Bijleveld van Lexmond of Neuchatel, Switzerland and its vice chair Dr. Jean-Marc Bonmatin, a researcher at the Centre National dela Recherche Scientifique of France.
In his presentation, Dr. Chung-Hsin Wu of the School of Life Science of the National Taiwan Normal University pointed out that echolocation bats (mostly insectivores) have "greatly disappeared in many places" in just nine years.
"Similarly, it is reported that bees also suddenly disappeared in many places of the world," he said, "It is possible due to intake of the systemic pesticide imidacloprid."
Insectivore bats are tagged as insect terminators and are thus natural predators who control pest population. Bees, on the other hand, are in charge of natural pollination of plants. Thus, their disappearance is not just about the bats and the bees, but the survival, propagation, and fruiting of plants.
Dr. Chung-Hsin, they embarked on a study on the bat's echolocation and its links to ingestion of imidacloprid.
"Our data show that ultrasonic sound spectrum emitted by bats is impaired when those bats eat insect with the pesticide of imidacloprid. In other words, vocal function of echolocation bats may be damaged by the pesticide of imidacloprid," he said.
Moreso, he said, their study also showed that "thresholds of auditory brainstem evoked response (ABR) is significantly increased when those bats eat insect with the pesticide of imidacloprid. In other words, auditory function of echolocation bats may be damaged by the pesticide of imidacloprid."
There was also an observed irregular flight path after the bats eat insects with that pesticide.
"In other words, orientation function of echolocation bats may be damaged by the pesticide of imidacloprid," he added.
Worse, Qiushi Professor K.L Heong of Zheijang University in Hangzhou, China, a former principal scientist of the International Rice Research INstitute (Irri) in Los Banos, Laguna, said, "It is a myth that pesticides are necessary to feed the world ... It is also a myth that insecticides have productivity gains in rice production."
This statement is backed by a study done in China (Jiangsu and Anhui Wang et. al. 2018), where the findings noted that marginal productivity of pesticides is close to zero, which indicates that there is overuse of pesticides in the surveyed areas. In the Zhang et. al. study done in 2015, overuse of pesticides in rice in China was pegged at 57 percent.
"In the Philippines, we found that 80% of farmers' insecticide sprays are misuses," he added.
In eight surveys done on 5,400 rice farms in Vietnam, five surveys showed no significate correlations between sprays and yields, 2 had significant negative correlations, and one had positive correlation.
In the positive correlation, farmers were found to gain US$7 per hectare excluding labor cost. While in the negative correlation, farmers stand to lose US$49 per hectare excluding labor cost.
"If labor and health costs are factored in, farmers have no productivity gains instead they can lose more than US$55 per hectare," he said.
Sad to say, despite the many indicators that systemic pesticides is doing something bad for the farmers in terms of productivity and health, and to bees and bats, that naturally help propagate plants, Komiko Taira of the Tokyo Women's Medical University Department of Anesthesiology said that specifically for neonicotinoids "there is a gap in the scientific knowledge on its environmental health effects."
This does not bode well both for the environment and humans because there is an increase in the use of neonicotinoids.
Moreso, she said, despite the increase of detection rate of neonicotinoids and metabolits in humans, "the environmental health effects of neonicotinoids especially on neurodevelopmental diseases, have not been given adequate public attention."
The scientific forum was participated in by experts, scientists, and researchers from Switzerland, France, Australia, China, Taipei, Japan, Italy, Vietnam, Canada, and the Philippines.
Given the adverse findings from across the globe, TFSP vice chair and a researcher at the Centre National dela Recherche Scientifique of France Dr. Jean-Marc Bonmatin said that more than ever, people all over the world should call for a stop to massive uses of systemic pesticides, pointing out that this runs against environmentally sustainable agricultural practices.
HRC CEO Fores said she did not expect the symposium to be as well-attended as it was by international scientists at that and was very appreciative of all the inputs and all those who attended.
"It was a very meaningful event that hopefully can bring real change through Mindanao," she said, noting that the participants showed an openness towards what the symposium was pushing for, that is alternatives to Systemic Pesticides.
In her message, Usep president Dr. Lourdes C. Generalao welcomed the gathering, citing it as a venue that she hopes will inspire more people to take action, government and policy-makers included.
Systemic pesticides are described as pesticides that you cannot wash off. Once sprayed, it is absorbed by the plant and "moves around in its tissues". Thus, it not only poses risks to human health but also to biodiversity and ecosystems.
Top on the list are Neonicotinoids or Neonics, which has been linked to the steep decline of bees, which in turn affects pollination and a lot of other side effects. Neonics are widely used worldwide for seed and soil treatments, foliar sprays, turf products, flea treatments for pests and lawn care. In short, it's everywhere.
Thus the gathering last June 27, 2018 at Apo View Hotel of over a 150 participants from the academe, agriculture and aquatic sectors, and international scientists in the 2018 International Scientific Symposium organized by the Task Force on Systemic Pesticides (TFSP) and University of Southeastern Philippines (Usep), in collaboration with the Hijo Resources Corporation (HRC), Southern Mindanao Agriculture, Aquatic, and Natural Resources Research Development Consortium (Smaaarrdec), Davao Oriental State College of Science and Technology (DOSCST), Conservation Center of the Philippine Islands Initiative Inc., and the De La Salle Family Life and Wellness Institute at Apo View Hotel.
On its website, TFSP describes itself as "the response of the scientific community to concern around the impact of systemic pesticides on biodiversity and ecosystems. Its intention is to provide the definitive view of science to inform more rapid and improved decision-making." It was represented in the symposium by its chair, Maarten Bijleveld van Lexmond of Neuchatel, Switzerland and its vice chair Dr. Jean-Marc Bonmatin, a researcher at the Centre National dela Recherche Scientifique of France.
In his presentation, Dr. Chung-Hsin Wu of the School of Life Science of the National Taiwan Normal University pointed out that echolocation bats (mostly insectivores) have "greatly disappeared in many places" in just nine years.
"Similarly, it is reported that bees also suddenly disappeared in many places of the world," he said, "It is possible due to intake of the systemic pesticide imidacloprid."
Insectivore bats are tagged as insect terminators and are thus natural predators who control pest population. Bees, on the other hand, are in charge of natural pollination of plants. Thus, their disappearance is not just about the bats and the bees, but the survival, propagation, and fruiting of plants.
Dr. Chung-Hsin, they embarked on a study on the bat's echolocation and its links to ingestion of imidacloprid.
"Our data show that ultrasonic sound spectrum emitted by bats is impaired when those bats eat insect with the pesticide of imidacloprid. In other words, vocal function of echolocation bats may be damaged by the pesticide of imidacloprid," he said.
Moreso, he said, their study also showed that "thresholds of auditory brainstem evoked response (ABR) is significantly increased when those bats eat insect with the pesticide of imidacloprid. In other words, auditory function of echolocation bats may be damaged by the pesticide of imidacloprid."
There was also an observed irregular flight path after the bats eat insects with that pesticide.
"In other words, orientation function of echolocation bats may be damaged by the pesticide of imidacloprid," he added.
Worse, Qiushi Professor K.L Heong of Zheijang University in Hangzhou, China, a former principal scientist of the International Rice Research INstitute (Irri) in Los Banos, Laguna, said, "It is a myth that pesticides are necessary to feed the world ... It is also a myth that insecticides have productivity gains in rice production."
This statement is backed by a study done in China (Jiangsu and Anhui Wang et. al. 2018), where the findings noted that marginal productivity of pesticides is close to zero, which indicates that there is overuse of pesticides in the surveyed areas. In the Zhang et. al. study done in 2015, overuse of pesticides in rice in China was pegged at 57 percent.
"In the Philippines, we found that 80% of farmers' insecticide sprays are misuses," he added.
In eight surveys done on 5,400 rice farms in Vietnam, five surveys showed no significate correlations between sprays and yields, 2 had significant negative correlations, and one had positive correlation.
In the positive correlation, farmers were found to gain US$7 per hectare excluding labor cost. While in the negative correlation, farmers stand to lose US$49 per hectare excluding labor cost.
"If labor and health costs are factored in, farmers have no productivity gains instead they can lose more than US$55 per hectare," he said.
Sad to say, despite the many indicators that systemic pesticides is doing something bad for the farmers in terms of productivity and health, and to bees and bats, that naturally help propagate plants, Komiko Taira of the Tokyo Women's Medical University Department of Anesthesiology said that specifically for neonicotinoids "there is a gap in the scientific knowledge on its environmental health effects."
This does not bode well both for the environment and humans because there is an increase in the use of neonicotinoids.
Moreso, she said, despite the increase of detection rate of neonicotinoids and metabolits in humans, "the environmental health effects of neonicotinoids especially on neurodevelopmental diseases, have not been given adequate public attention."
The scientific forum was participated in by experts, scientists, and researchers from Switzerland, France, Australia, China, Taipei, Japan, Italy, Vietnam, Canada, and the Philippines.
Given the adverse findings from across the globe, TFSP vice chair and a researcher at the Centre National dela Recherche Scientifique of France Dr. Jean-Marc Bonmatin said that more than ever, people all over the world should call for a stop to massive uses of systemic pesticides, pointing out that this runs against environmentally sustainable agricultural practices.
HRC CEO Fores said she did not expect the symposium to be as well-attended as it was by international scientists at that and was very appreciative of all the inputs and all those who attended.
"It was a very meaningful event that hopefully can bring real change through Mindanao," she said, noting that the participants showed an openness towards what the symposium was pushing for, that is alternatives to Systemic Pesticides.
In her message, Usep president Dr. Lourdes C. Generalao welcomed the gathering, citing it as a venue that she hopes will inspire more people to take action, government and policy-makers included.
Rice Cookers Market
expands Globally with Impressive Sales Trends by 2022
New
Research into the “Rice Cookers market” in a new report titled Rice Cookers
Market: Global Industry Analysis and Opportunity Assessment, 2018–2025.” the
report, sheds light on the various factors and trends impacting market growth
over the forecast period (2018 – 2025).”
Description
The
Rice Cookers market overview, which is the beginning of the report, consists of
various factors such as definitions, applications, and classifications of the
Rice Cookers. Industry chain structure, industry news analysis, and industry
policy analysis are also covered in the industry overview section of the market
research report
The following Companies as the
Key Players in the Global Rice Cookers Market Research Report 2018:
• Midea• Tiger• ZOJIRUSHI• Toshiba•
Matsushita• Mitsubishi• Sanyo• Philips• LG•
Covered
in this report
The
market research report provides an in-depth analysis of the major industry
leading players along with the company profiles and strategies adopted by them.
This enables the buyer of the report to gain a telescopic view of the
competitive landscape and plan the strategies accordingly. A separate section
with industry key players is included in the report, which provides a
comprehensive analysis of price, cost, gross, revenue, product picture,
specifications, company profile, and contact information.
Get a Sample of Rice Cookers
Market research report fromhttps://www.marketreportsworld.com/enquiry/request-sample/10528923
Rice Cookers Market Segment
considering Production, Revenue (Value), Price Trend by Type:
• Electric Rice Cookers• Gas
Rice Cookers
Secondly
the study, besides estimating the Rice Cookers market potential till 2025,
analyzes on who can be the market leaders and what partnerships would help them
to capture the market share. The Rice Cookers Industry report gives an overview
about the dynamics of the market, by discussing various aspects such as
drivers, restraints, Porter’s 5 forces, value chain, customer acceptance and
investment scenario
Key Points Covered in TOC:
Global
Rice Cookers Market Research Report 2018
Global
Rice Cookers Market Competition by Manufacturers
Global
Rice Cookers Capacity, Production, Revenue (Value) by Region (2012-2018)
Global
Rice Cookers Supply (Production), Consumption, Export, Import by Region
(2012-2018)
Global
Rice Cookers Production, Revenue (Value), Price Trend by Type
Global
Rice Cookers Market Analysis by Application
Global
Rice Cookers Manufacturers Profiles/Analysis
Rice
Cookers Manufacturing Cost Analysis
Industrial
Chain, Sourcing Strategy and Downstream Buyers
Marketing
Strategy Analysis, Distributors/Traders
Market
Effect Factors Analysis
Global Rice Cookers Market by
Type and Application (2012-2018)
Global
Rice Cookers Market Size by Type and Application (2012-2018)Global Rice Cookers
Market Size by Type (2012-2018)Global Rice Cookers Market Size by Application
(2012-2018)Potential Application of Rice Cookers in FutureTop Consumer/End
Users of Rice Cookers
Global Market Forecast
2018-2025
The
industry research report analyses the supply, sales, production, and market
status comprehensively. Production market shares and sales market shares are
analysed along with the study of capacity, production, sales, and revenue.
Several other factors such as import, export, gross margin, price, cost, and
consumption are also analysed under the section Analysis of production, supply,
sales and market status.
Purchase Rice Cookers Market
Report at:https://www.marketreportsworld.com/purchase/10528923
Lastly,
The Rice Cookers Market report covers the market landscape and its growth
prospects over the coming years, the Report also brief deals with the product
life cycle, comparing it to the relevant products from across industries that
had already been commercialized details the potential for various applications,
discussing about recent product innovations and gives an overview on potential
regional market shares.
The “Gesture Recognition &
Touchless Sensing Market: Global Industry Analysis, Size, Share, Growth,
Trends, and Forecasts 2016–2024” report is well crafted with a combination
of the crucial data associated with worldwide market, along with key factors
liable for the demand for its services and merchandise. The report highlights
the newest technological developments and new launches that assist our customer
to set up their future-based potential products, make …
Rice exports hit
the $2bn mark again
July
02, 2018
THE country recorded around $2 billion
worth of rice exports in the fiscal year ending in June after remaining below
this level for two years, say senior officials of the Trade Development
Authority of Pakistan (TDAP).
Rice exports had reached $2bn for the
first time in fiscal year 2015. Officials of TDAP claim that the country has
achieved the target of 4 million tonnes and export earnings of $2bn. But
official statistics of exports for the outgoing fiscal year would be out in the
third week of July.
According to the Pakistan Bureau of
Statistics (PBS), Pakistan exported 3.84m tonnes of both basmati and
non-basmati rice for $1.89bn from July 2017 to May 2018. Historically, rice
exports remain high in volumes in the second half of our fiscal year, ie from
January to June, due to the fact that the rice marketing year begins from
October.
This trend remained visible in fiscal
year 2017-18, too. Export earnings increased accordingly in dollar terms but
they meant more for exporters in terms of local currency due to the 10 per cent
depreciation of the rupee against the US dollar.
The rupee came down from 110.42 a dollar
on Dec 30, 2017 to 121.50 on June 26, 2018 in the interbank market as Pakistan
failed to fix its massive current account deficit.
“Unless share of basmati in overall rice
export volumes is increased to 20-25pc in coming years, growth in rice exports
earnings might remain just moderate despite all aggressive marketing,” fears a
top official of TDAP
TDAP officials say that the rupee
depreciation and the State Bank of Pakistan’s (SBP) stricter vigil on trade
dollar movements also have led to the faster realisation of export proceeds of
all items including rice.
They offer this argument to support the
claim that rice exports hit $2bn a few days before the end of June from $1.89bn
at the end of May, showing a build up of $110m in less than a month. After
hitting $2bn in FY15, rice exports had fallen to $1.86bn in FY16 and then to
$1.61bn in FY17.
This was due to insufficient exports of
high-priced basmati varieties, low average per tonne export price and an
inability of the exporters to sustain market share in some key export markets
including China, Oman and the United Arab Emirates.
High domestic prices of rice during these
two years amid tough competition in the international market and consequent
decline in export margins had also dampened the spirit of our exporters,
especially those engaged in bulk shipments of unpackaged rice.
But in FY18, things improved on almost
all fronts. Out of the top 20 export markets, shipments to 14 of them during
ten months of FY18 recorded a rising trend. In some cases export earnings more
than doubled.
Exports to half a dozen of them, however,
showed a declining trend, according to SBP figures. A real achievement would be
exports rising beyond $2bn at a double digit rate for years to come, officials
of TDAP insist.
Exporters say that for that to happen,
milled rice production must also grow to continue to create enough export
surplus. Pakistan’s milled rice output has been growing but remains below 8m
tonnes, a level that the exporters think is crucial given a rising trend in
local consumption of rice.
Water shortages, increasing domestic
demand for export-crucial basmati varieties, and imports of an inferior quality
hybrid paddy seeds amid a lack of large-scale initiatives to promote
water-efficient rice cultivation are some key impediments to sustaining growth
in exports.
During the outgoing fiscal year,
exporters not only fetched huge orders from a number of countries, including
even the rice-exporting Indonesia, but also managed to sell rice at a higher
value per tonne taking advantage of stable market prices and focusing on
exports of branded rice in consumer packaging.
Average per-tonne export price of basmati
rice in 11 months of FY18 rose to around $1,040, up from below $950 a year ago,
officials say, adding that average export value of non-Basmati varieties also
rose to $417 per tonne from $377 per tonne.
This is partially attributable to a rise
in international prices fuelled by a higher demand, but also to the fact that
several Pakistani rice companies, including Matco Foods, invested in the
processing and packaging of rice to fetch high export revenue, market watchers
add.
Exporters and officials agree that for
sustaining growth in export earnings of rice, increasing the share of
higher-priced basmati varieties is a must. Currently, this share is just 12pc
and has historically ranged between 10 -15pc.
“Unless share of basmati in overall rice
export volumes is increased to 20-25pc in coming years, growth in rice exports
earnings might remain just moderate despite all aggressive marketing,” fears a
top official of TDAP. That is where investment in rice research counts.
But as local consumption of premium rice
has also been rising steadily, the pace of growth in production needs to be
accelerated further. Officials say that this will not be possible without
greater investment in research and collaboration with international rice research
agencies.
Published in
Dawn, The Business and Finance Weekly, July 2nd, 2018
For more live
updates, follow Dawn.com's official news Instagram account @dawn.today
Rice Cookers Market expands Globally with Impressive Sales
Trends by 2022
New
Research into the “Rice Cookers market” in a new report titled Rice Cookers
Market: Global Industry Analysis and Opportunity Assessment, 2018–2025.” the
report, sheds light on the various factors and trends impacting market growth
over the forecast period (2018 – 2025).”
Description
The
Rice Cookers market overview, which is the beginning of the report, consists of
various factors such as definitions, applications, and classifications of the
Rice Cookers. Industry chain structure, industry news analysis, and industry
policy analysis are also covered in the industry overview section of the market
research report
The following Companies as the
Key Players in the Global Rice Cookers Market Research Report 2018:
• Midea• Tiger• ZOJIRUSHI•
Toshiba• Matsushita• Mitsubishi• Sanyo• Philips• LG•
Covered
in this report
The
market research report provides an in-depth analysis of the major industry
leading players along with the company profiles and strategies adopted by them.
This enables the buyer of the report to gain a telescopic view of the
competitive landscape and plan the strategies accordingly. A separate section
with industry key players is included in the report, which provides a
comprehensive analysis of price, cost, gross, revenue, product picture,
specifications, company profile, and contact information.
Get a Sample of Rice Cookers
Market research report fromhttps://www.marketreportsworld.com/enquiry/request-sample/10528923
Rice Cookers Market Segment
considering Production, Revenue (Value), Price Trend by Type:
• Electric Rice Cookers• Gas
Rice Cookers
Secondly
the study, besides estimating the Rice Cookers market potential till 2025,
analyzes on who can be the market leaders and what partnerships would help them
to capture the market share. The Rice Cookers Industry report gives an overview
about the dynamics of the market, by discussing various aspects such as
drivers, restraints, Porter’s 5 forces, value chain, customer acceptance and
investment scenario
Key Points Covered in TOC:
Global
Rice Cookers Market Research Report 2018
Global
Rice Cookers Market Competition by Manufacturers
Global
Rice Cookers Capacity, Production, Revenue (Value) by Region (2012-2018)
Global
Rice Cookers Supply (Production), Consumption, Export, Import by Region
(2012-2018)
Global
Rice Cookers Production, Revenue (Value), Price Trend by Type
Global
Rice Cookers Market Analysis by Application
Global
Rice Cookers Manufacturers Profiles/Analysis
Rice
Cookers Manufacturing Cost Analysis
Industrial
Chain, Sourcing Strategy and Downstream Buyers
Marketing
Strategy Analysis, Distributors/Traders
Market
Effect Factors Analysis
Global Rice Cookers Market by
Type and Application (2012-2018)
Global
Rice Cookers Market Size by Type and Application (2012-2018)Global Rice Cookers
Market Size by Type (2012-2018)Global Rice Cookers Market Size by Application
(2012-2018)Potential Application of Rice Cookers in FutureTop Consumer/End
Users of Rice Cookers
Global Market Forecast
2018-2025
The
industry research report analyses the supply, sales, production, and market
status comprehensively. Production market shares and sales market shares are
analysed along with the study of capacity, production, sales, and revenue.
Several other factors such as import, export, gross margin, price, cost, and
consumption are also analysed under the section Analysis of production, supply,
sales and market status.
Purchase Rice Cookers Market
Report at:https://www.marketreportsworld.com/purchase/10528923
Lastly,
The Rice Cookers Market report covers the market landscape and its growth
prospects over the coming years, the Report also brief deals with the product
life cycle, comparing it to the relevant products from across industries that
had already been commercialized details the potential for various applications,
discussing about recent product innovations and gives an overview on potential
regional market shares.
Post Views: 29