Thursday, February 14, 2019

14th February,2019 Daily Global Regional Local Rice E-Newsletter


Arkansas rice production marks recovery from 2017 flooding; hay, peanuts decline

  
Even if the fall of 2018 marked the “harvest that never ended,” Arkansas growers managed to pull enough rice from the land to mark a 30 percent increase over 2017′s disastrous numbers, which reflected the severe flooding of that year’s spring, officials said.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s National Agricultural Statistics Service released state-by-state crop and stock reports Feb. 8, the first new data available from the department since the 35-day partial shutdown of the federal government.
Not only was 2018 a strong year for Arkansas rice growers, with a total production of 107 million cwt, but U.S. rice as a whole, said Jarrod Hardke, Extension rice agronomist for the University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture.
“Arkansas rice yield and acres came right in line with expectation,” Hardke said. “However, it was surprising to see a substantial increase in overall U.S. yields, which marks the second highest on record. Some individual state yields increased more than 800 pounds per acre over previous estimates.”
Some Arkansas crops saw modest year-over-year increases, including corn, which rose 7 percent to 117 million bushels, and upland cotton, which also rose 7 percent to an estimated 1.15 million bales, results that several extension agronomists described as unsurprising, and generally in line with annual averages.
The state’s No. 1 crop, soybean, saw a 7 percent decline in production from 2017, falling to about 165.2 million bushels. The dip was overshadowed by the increasing supply on hand, accumulated in part due to the ongoing trade dispute with China.
Nationwide, total stocks of stored soybeans rose 18 percent over 2017 numbers more than 3.7 billion bushels, stored both on farms and off. Soybean stocks stored on farms, specifically, totaled 1.94 billion bushels, up 30 percent from a year ago.
While the report didn’t make numbers for Arkansas available, the national situation reflected what Arkansas growers are dealing with, said Scott Stiles, Extension economist for the Division of Agriculture.
“Normally, we use the bulk of on-farm storage for corn and rice,” Stiles said. “Given the quality issues, drop in soybean prices and weakness in the basis at harvest, my feeling was that our growers would allocate a lot more bin space to soybeans following the 2018 crop.”
Peanut production in Arkansas dropped about 25 percent in 2018 to about 2.2 million pounds. Travis Faske, extension pathologist and peanut agronomist with the Division of Agriculture, said poor harvesting conditions and the abandonment of several thousand acres in peanut production led to the lower number, although the average yield “was positive, and among the best, compared to other peanut producing states.”
The Feb. 8 report also referenced winter wheat in the state, which is forecast to have the lowest acreage since 1955, at about 120,000 acres. Jason Kelley, extension wheat and feed grains agronomist with the Division of Agriculture, said the numbers were not surprising, “given the very wet fall that prevented most acres from being planted.”
Finally, sorghum, which occupies relatively few acres in the state, nevertheless saw a substantial increase in 2018 of 41 percent, with Arkansas growers producing about 770,000 bushels throughout the year.
To learn about agriculture in Arkansas, contact a local Cooperative Extension Service agent or visit www.uaex.edu. Follow us on Twitter at @UAEX_edu.
The University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture offers all its Extension and Research programs to all eligible persons without discrimination.
— Ryan McGeeney is with the U of A System Division of Agriculture.

Webinar: A First Look at the Farm Bill, Jan. 31

January 29, 2019

Description: https://i1.wp.com/agfax.com/wp-content/uploads/corn-pre-tassel-farm-landscape-beauty-rows-DF2003-0031.jpg?fit=600%2C400&ssl=1
Corn field landscape, pre-tassel. Photo: ©Debra L Ferguson
Join us on Thursday, January 31st at 8 a.m. CST for a webinar presentation by Keith Coble, MSU ag economist. He will focus on the provisions of the new Agricultural Improvement Act of 2018. Specific provision of interest to row crop farmers will be examined.
About the presenter: Keith Coble is a Giles Distinguished Professor and Head of the Agricultural Economics Department at Mississippi State University where he focuses on agricultural policy, insurance, and agricultural data analytics. Within his profession, Coble is the President-elect of the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association (AAEA).
Coble has testified before Congressional Committees on three occasions regarding agricultural policy and served as the Chief Economist for the Minority Staff of the Senate Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry Committee during the 2013-2014 farm bill debate.

Tax, Rice and Central Bank Bills Are Piling Up on Duterte's Desk

By Siegfrid Alegado  and Andreo Calonzo
February 13, 2019, 3:00 AM GMT+5
Photographer: Noel Celis/AFP

Philippines President Rodrigo Duterte’s signature is all that’s needed to enact bills that will allow more rice imports, boost the central bank’s capital and grant the first tax amnesty in a decade.
But these economic measures, along with more than two dozen bills, are piling up and awaiting Duterte’s final approval. Under the law, bills that are neither signed nor vetoed by the president will lapse into law 30 days after they were transmitted by Congress.
The bill that will remove import restrictions on rice and is counted on to help damp inflation was transmitted to Duterte’s office on Jan. 16 and will lapse into law on Feb. 15, unless the president vetoes it. Agriculture Secretary Emmanuel Pinol said last month that he had asked the president to make changes on the rice measure.
Senate President Tito Sotto said he doesn’t know what has happened to the rice bill. Presidential spokesman Salvador Panelo said he hasn’t gotten any word on the status of the pending pieces of legislation. Executive Secretary Salvador Medialdea hasn’t answered calls and text messages seeking comment.
“It’s imperative that the president gets them through to law,” said Nicholas Mapa, a senior economist at ING Groep NV in Manila. “Their passage could send a signal to investors that Duterte is indeed a man of action.”

Key Pending Measures

·       A rice reform bill allowing more imports is seen by policy makers to shave off about one percentage point from annual inflation. In 2018, a rice shortage along with higher taxes and elevated oil prices pushed inflation to the fastest pace in nine years and triggered a 175-basis-point increase in the central bank’s policy rate.
·       Amendments to the central bank’s charter will increase its capital to 200 billion pesos ($3.8 billion) and also expand its regulatory powers to cover payment systems operators and foreign exchange companies.
·       The first tax amnesty since 2007 is estimated to raise about 41 billion pesos in additional revenue.
·       Changes to the nation’s corporation code will allow the perpetual existence of corporations.
Time needed to adjust to rice tariffication — IRRI
February 13, 2019 | 10:03 pm
PHILSTAR
TIME is needed to prepare rice farmers for the adjustment to heightened competition to be brought by rice tariffication, the head of the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) said.
“Clearly, the liberalization process exposes long-term the industry to more international competition,” IRRI Director General Matthew Morell said on Wednesday during the signing of a memorandum of understanding (MoU) with the Department of Agriculture (DA) on scientific and technical collaboration in support of enhancing the Philippine rice industry’s competitiveness.
“Time is needed to adjust and some of the ability, from our perspective — the research and development work at IRRI and PhilRice — does need to be nurtured through enhanced education and training,” Mr. Morell added.
Agriculture Secretary Emmanuel F. Piñol said that interventions to support farmers should reach them before the tariffication starts.
“If the interventions are ready right away and our farmers are given enough time to make use of those interventions to improve their productivity, yes our farmers can compete. But if we immediately implement liberalization even before the interventions can reach our farmers and even before they can improve their productivity, it would lead to the death of the rice industry,” Mr. Piñol said.
He did not elaborate on the required lead time to prepare farmers for competition.
Among the interventions contemplated under the Rice Competitiveness Enhancement Fund (RCEF) are equipment and mechanization, rice crop financing, and assistance with marketing and training.
“Right now, the farmers are complaining even without liberalized importation. There is speculation among the traders and they’re not buying palay right now, so the price of palay (unmilled rice) has dropped to P14 to P15 per kilo from a high of P25 last year,” Mr. Piñol said.
“The IRRI is both a source of pride for the Philippines and a reason for embarrassment. Why? We take pride in the fact that we host the research institution that has developed the world’s rice industry. But we’re embarrassed by the fact that even with the presence of IRRI in our midst and our own PhilRice, we have not yet attained that dream of rice self sufficiency. We can’t even produce enough rice for ourselves,” Mr. Piñol said.
Mr. Piñol added he has discussed with banks the possibility of providing more loan support to farmers. According to Mr. Piñol, the banks have insufficient guidance from the government in lending to the agricultural industry.
Meanwhile, the Federation of Filipino-Chinese Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FFCCCII) said on Wednesday that the rice tariffication is a “much-needed” reform to curb inflation especially among those living in poverty.
“Rice is the staple food of our nation and it comprises almost 20% of the household expense of low-income households. We believe that by removing the import quotas on rice and replacing them with tariffs, the price of rice will significantly be lower as there will be competition and the lack of available cheap rice will no longer be an issue,” the FFCCCII said in a letter addressed to President Rodrigo R. Duterte.
“This measure is a much-needed reform that will help our countrymen,” the FFCIII stated in the letter. — Reicelene Joy N. Ignacio

Rice tarrification a commitment to WTO: Piñol

Published by  Desk man at  February 13, 2019
AGRICULTURE SECRETARY Emmanuel “Manny” Piñol said the proposed rice tariffication measure, which is expected to be signed into law by President Rodrigo Duterte sometime soon, is a commitment of the country to the World Trade Organization (WTO).
“The DA has very clear position to support the rice tariffication. There’s no way we cannot support that as it is our commitment to the WTO,” said Piñol in an interview at the sidelines of the Sugar Summit held Tuesday at the Bureau of Soils and Water Management (BSWM).
He, however, stressed that there is a need to study the effect of total deregulation especially on the stability of rice prices.
“We were just asking for a little more study on the indemnification of the total deregulation, especially on the stability of the buying price of palay. Right now, it dropped to PHP14-15,” he said.
“If the price of palay decreases, sakit din ng ulo namin sa DA kasi magrereklamo ang mga farmers,” he added.
Piñol said the only way to arrest that is “to allow NFA (National Food Authority) to continue buying from the farmers at an indicated support price which we are doing right now.”
“The only problem is that NFA might not be able to sustain the procurement of rice given the fact it will no longer be allowed under the proposed bill to make borrowings,” he said.
In a statement by the Philippine Chamber of Agriculture and Food Inc. (PCAFI), it said that the country’s agriculture is at an important crossroads.
“How the rice farmers will be treated will determine how the rest of the sectors will be so treated. Since rice is the most political of commodities, if the government will be seen as having abandoned the rice farmers to the ravages of unfair trade so that consumers can savor the magic of the market (which they haven’t even with the 1995 shock liberalization), then investments in the sector will shrink,” it said.
Senator Cynthia Villar earlier said that the President has already certified as urgent the rice tariffication bill to protect Filipino farmers from the influx of imported grains as a result of the removal of quantitative restriction (QR) being imposed by the WTO.
Villar, chair of the Senate committee on agriculture and food, said that farmers were being misled by some groups who are against tariffication to protect their own vested interests.
“Unlike claims that tariffication will result to flooding of imported rice to Philippine market, this will make such importation beneficial to local rice producers,” she said.
The rice industry, Villar said, is set to be liberalized due to expiration of QR on June 30, 2017.
“Pag nag-liberalize ka nang walang tariff, kawawa ang mga farmers (When you liberalize without tariff, the farmers will suffer),” she said.
Under the Rice Tariffication Bill, a PHP10-billion a year Rice Competitiveness Enhancement Fund (RCEF) will be allocated for five years.
This funding will be channeled through the Philippine Center for Postharvest Development and Mechanization, Philippine Rice Research Institute, and Technical Education and Skills Development Authority as well as other agencies tasked to upgrade farmers technology and know-how.
PCAFI, however, said that these are supposedly the safety nets, but “experience teaches that even safety nets provided for by law can be undermined by ideology and poor governance.”
“These safety nets seemed to be more for show because up to now the government has no trade data system to determine if an importation is in accordance with the rules of the WTO in terms of valuation and trade remedies, if any,” it added. (Lilybeth Ison)

Rice tariffication may kill PH rice industry if farmers don't get help: Piñol

Kori Quintos, ABS-CBN News
Feb 13 2019 03:31 PM
Description: https://sa.kapamilya.com/absnews/abscbnnews/media/2019/news/02/13/20181123-farmers-nueva-ecija-jc-2.jpg?ext=.jpgFarmers along the Nueva Ecija-Aurora road take advantage of the good weather and start land preparations for the next rice planting cycle on November 23, 2018. Jire Carreon, ABS-CBN
MANILA – Filipino rice farmers need immediate help to improve productivity if they are to compete against rice importers amid the impending approval of the Rice Tariffication Bill, the Department of Agriculture said Wednesday. 
Agriculture Secretary Manny Piñol added that without "intervention" local rice farmers cannot expect to compete against cheaper imports. 
“But if we immediately implement liberalization even before the interventions could reach our farmers and even before they could improve their productivity, it could lead to the death of the rice industry,” Piñol said.
Rice industry groups earlier warned against the approval of the Bill saying it could kill the local rice sector. 
Malacañang however, has said that the removal of import restrictions on rice is "for the greater good."
The DA, meanwhile is already implementing several measures to help farmers improve productivity, Piñol said. 
The Department has renewed its partnership with the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) to improve rice production by using better seeds.
The rice planting calendar has also been adjusted to minimize the effect of potential typhoons in September, October and December.
The Department plans to raise rice production to 20 million metric tons this year compared to 19.6 million metric tons last year, Piñol said. 
Rice tariffication removes non-tariff barriers for rice imports, allowing a free flow of the staple into the Philippine market.
President Rodrigo Duterte certified the bill as urgent in October last year, as the country's inflation quickened to its fastest pace in nearly a decade as food costs, particularly the price of rice, surged.

Exporters blame EU tariffs for 5 pct drop in rice shipments

Sum Manet / Khmer Times    

Rice exports in January saw a small decline that exporters have blamed on the European Union’s decision last month to impose tariffs on local rice.
Last month, Cambodia exported 59,625 tonnes of rice to international markets, a 5 percent drop compared to January 2018, according to a report issued yesterday by the Secretariat of One Window Service for Rice Export Formality.
The same report points out that the EU bought 20,000 tonnes of Cambodian rice in January, which is around 40 percent of all Cambodian rice exports. China bought about the same amount.
. .
In January, the European Commission decided to re-impose tariffs on rice coming from Cambodia and Myanmar to protect farmers in Europe, whom the European Union believed to be at a disadvantage.
During the first year, the EU is levying 175 euros ($199.5) per tonne on imports of Cambodian rice. 150 euros ($171) will be charged in the second year, and 125 euros ($142.5) in the last.
Hun Lak, vice president of Cambodia Rice Federation, said orders of Cambodian rice abroad saw a decline last month because international buyers were busy preparing for holidays like the Chinese New Year and the Vietnamese New Year, but also because the EU tariffs went into effect.
“These factors led to a slight decline in rice exports,” he said, adding that rice exports to the EU remained large because a lot of European buyers had placed their orders before the tariffs kicked in.
Cambodian rice. KT/Chor Sokunthea
He said the real impact of the tariffs will be felt in February and following months, but had some room for optimism.
. .
“Exports to the EU are likely to decrease, but it will really depend on whether consumers continue to choose Cambodian rice despite the price increase. We have to wait and see,” he said.
Mr Lak stressed the need to diversify away from the EU market and to make local rice more competitive internationally by reducing production costs.
Chan Sokheang, chairman and CEO of Signatures of Asia, said the 5 percent decline was not alarming, adding that the worst is still to come.
He estimated that last month only 20 to 25 percent of Cambodian rice shipped to Europe was taxed.
“What really worries us is February and March, when the tariffs will have a bigger impact. We hope the loss in shipments to the EU can be offset by more exports to China.”
. .
Mr Sokheang said his company did not see a drop in sales in January but that it is likely to be a different story this month.
Another rice exporter contacted by Khmer Times and who asked for anonymity said, “Exports decreased last month because the EU is our biggest buyer. Unfortunately, the tariffs are likely to have a much larger impact in upcoming months.
“Our company saw a 3 to 4 percent decline in orders from the EU in January,” the exporter said, adding that some European buyers are now choosing to buy rice from producers in Thailand and Vietnam instead of Cambodia.
Cambodia exported 626,225 tonnes of rice to international markets in 2018, a drop of 1.5 percent compared to 2017.

Guyana denies shipping “bad’ rice to Jamaica

By CMC
February 12, 2019
Description: https://www.stlucianewsonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/RICE.jpgGEORGETOWN, Guyana, Feb 12, CMC – Guyana says it has not shipped any rice to Jamaica under the “Cinderella” brand for the year after media reports in Kingston said that 70 metric tonnes of White Cinderella rice had been confiscated by Jamaican authorities.
The reports said that the rice, valued at valued at approximately J$4.6 million (One Jamaica dollar=US$0.008 cents) had been confiscated after officials from the Ministry of Industries, Agriculture and Fisheries had carried out a series of inspections and finding that the product had signs of mould, clumping, discoloration and wetting.
But the general manager of the Guyana Rice Development Board (GRDB), Nizam Hassa, who has expressed concern over the claims, said no rice has been shipped to Jamaica so far this year, by the miller who packages under the Cinderella brand.
“I am very disturbed by these reports. We have since reached out to the Food Storage and Prevention of Infestation Division in the Ministry of Industry, Commerce, Agriculture and Fisheries in Jamaica and are awaiting a response.
“The situation is puzzling since the last shipment left Guyana on the 15th December and arrived on the 19th December, 2018. Like any other shipment, the rice that was sent to Jamaica underwent a series of physical tests and was certified. The Board conducts such tests on paddy, rice and rice by- products prior to any shipment leaving Guyana,” Hassan said.
GRDB export records also revealed that the supplier, to date, has not received any complaints from the buyer in Jamaica or any other of its markets and has been paid for all rice shipped.
Export reports also indicate no one shipment from the supplier amounted to 70 tonnes.
Hassa said that rice could develop mould if it becomes wet in storage.
“It is very important that the rice be stored in a dry place. Mould and other bacteria can develop on the grain if the rice is exposed to moisture or becomes wet in storage,” Hassan said.
The GRDB said it is urging all players within the industry to remain vigilant as the matter is being investigated.
Experts push research-based legislations to boost food security
By Saul Pa-a  February 13, 2019, 5:31 pm
LOS BAŇOS, Laguna -- Scientists and experts have proposed to government policy makers the crafting of research-based legislations that will address food security issues.
The panel of savants from the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), Japan’s Nagoya University (NU) and University of the Philippines in Los Baños (UPLB) and the academe, pitched the call on Monday at a forum “Catalyzing Partnerships in Research Excellence and Internationalization of Education towards Food Security in the Asian and African Regions” at IRRI Havener auditorium here.
The expert resource panel pointed out that policy makers could turn to the universities and research institutions as platforms for research collaboration and education, as agriculture faces many challenges such as pests and diseases, climate change, and decreasing farmlands due to urbanization.
Prof. Fumio Isoda, director of the Asian Satellite Campuses Institute of Nagoya University Isoda, said research from the laboratories could reach the farms especially on technology transfer through the government support on peer research and collaboration to make these research outputs more applicable to farmers.
Isoda also shared the Nagoya University’s Asian Satellite Campuses Institute which has its hub at UPLB that is currently working closely with partner institutions to further education, research collaboration, and human resource development.
Dr. Fernando Sanchez Jr., Chancellor of UP in Los Baños (UPLB), said Republic Act 9500 strengthened the UP as a national university mandated to be a graduate research and a public service university.
“Public service is clamped in any UP system, tasked to download the results of all its projects especially on research funded by the national government. But, somewhere down the line, I believe we have the challenging situation where farmers just don’t adopt the research done by UPLB scientists,” he said.
Sanchez said issues on food security and production in the food value chain could be addressed through capacity-building and knowledge generation.
“In the Philippines, we have all the laws that have been institutionalized but somewhere down the line, we are not following. We have to educate our politicians more because we have a lot of resources and still, we have a problem on food security,” he said.
He offered that scientists have the knowledge they could share with policy makers whom he observed, are not that well-informed on how things should be addressed in relation to food security and related problems.
Meanwhile, Dr. Abdelbagi Ismail, IRRI’s Regional Representative to Africa, saw the need to intensify research collaborations and education especially in knowledge-sharing and technology expertise in developing countries to accelerate food and agriculture security and eradicate poverty.
“Increasing population growth, decreasing resources, calls for better nutrition and pressing threats of climate change continuously call for the agriculture sector to accelerate production,” he said. (PNA)
AP quizzes TS witness before Brijesh Tribunal
HYDERABAD, FEBRUARY 14, 2019 00:51 IST
UPDATED: FEBRUARY 14, 2019 00:51 IST

Palanisami was engaged by TS to study water requirements under irrigation projects in two States

Hearing in the case related to sharing of Krishna waters by Telangana and Andhra Pradesh States was resumed by the Brijesh Kumar Tribunal, Krishna Water Disputes Tribunal-II, in New Delhi on Wednesday, with counsel for AP A.K. Ganguli cross-examining Telangana’s witness K. Palanisami.

Methodology discussed

An agricultural economist by profession, Mr. Palanisami from Coimbatore in Tamil Nadu was engaged by the Telangana Government to study the water requirements under several irrigation projects in the two States.
The cross-examination of Telangana’s witness by the AP counsel on the day-one revolved around the methodologies adopted in calculating the crop water estimation or irrigation water requirement.
Mr. Palanisami told the tribunal that he and a few scientists of State Agricultural University were also associated with his study and he also had discussions with scientists of Indian Institute of Rice Research (IIRR) and Central Research Institute of Dryland Agriculture (CRIDA), both located in Hyderabad, for the purpose of his exercise on crop water requirement.
The Telangana witness further told the tribunal, on being asked by the counsel for AP, that after examining 4 to 5 methods he along with his associates had agreed upon using the Penman Monteith Method for calculation of crop water requirement stating that the other methods were useful for micro environment in calculating evapo- transporation, the process by which water is transferred from the land to the atmosphere by evaporation from the soil and other surfaces and by transpiration from plants, as part of crop water requirement estimation.

Optimum use of water

He explained to the tribunal that his assignment was basically to work out crop water requirement based on scientific methodology and optimum utilisation of water. For the analysis, he had availed three sets of data – project-wise area, crop-related co-efficient and cropping pattern-cropped area provided by the Irrigation Department of Telangana.
During the hearing, Chief Engineer (Inter State Water Resources) S. Narasimha Rao and other officials of the Irrigation Department of Telangana were present.

Cameroon encouraged to revive traditional farming after losing billions to imports

Published on 13.02.2019 at 13h02 by Journalducameroun
Description: https://www.journalducameroun.com/en/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/agrobiz-780x440.jpg
Women tilling farmland (c)Business in Cameroon

The Government of Cameroon has been urged to revive and encourage traditional and ecological farming methods after the country recently lost over 9.000 billion from the importation of basic food stuff.

News that the news that the government of Cameroon has lost over 9 000 billion FCFA from importing rice, corn, sugar and fish has triggered reactions from several quarters as calls have multiplied for the country to boost its agricultural sector.
Forest Campaigner, Sylvie Djacbou called on the government to step up efforts to curb excessive dependence on foreign products.
“It is troubling that a country endowed with a lot of ecological agriculture potential should be importing basic foodstuffs worth billions of FCFA at the detriment of the local economy. This is a reality check for the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development to get its act together and abandon its reliance on imports.
“Cameroon produces rice in the Far North, West and North West regions, but national demand far outweighs supply.  During the 2011 Agropastoral Show, President Paul Biya promised to curb excessive dependence on foreign importation of basic foodstuff, but there are still no measures to promote sustainable farming in Cameroon.
“Greenpeace Africa believes that the latest scandal presents an opportunity to revive and encourage traditional and ecological farming practices. This form of farming enabled Cameroon to export basic foodstuff until 1975. This will also strengthen food security and long term sustainability of Cameroon’s agricultural sector.
“For many decades, the government has been paying lip service to reduce food imports and improving and modernising the agricultural sector in Cameroon. Government initiatives like the Societe de Transformation du Manioc de Sangmelima (SOTRAMAS) were being designed to stimulate local production but Cameroonians are yet to see any benefits. It would be detrimental and catastrophic for the government to continue with business as usual.”
‘Just import rice,’ focus on high-value crops
FEBRUARY 14, 2019
JUST IMPORT RICE,’ FOCUS ON HIGH-VALUE CROPS
The agriculture sector could see growth accelerate if farmers abandon rice and shift to growing high-value crops, a Cabinet official claimed on Wednesday.
“A growth of maybe 3-4 percent is possible for the sector if we focus on high-value crops and just import rice,” Budget Secretary Benjamin Diokno told reporters, adding that trade should also be liberalized as much as possible to realize the industry’s potentials.
Description: https://s14255.pcdn.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/import.jpgA worker from Antonio Porne grain center in Tondo, Manila arranges sacks of repacked NFA rice. PHOTO BY RUSSELL PALMA
“That is the most efficient economic arrangement. And as I said, you always have to think of what’s the greatest good for the farmers,” he said.
The Budget chief underscored the importance of rice tariffication — a proposed law is just waiting for President Rodrigo Duterte’s signature — and the planned deregularization of sugar imports.
“You have to put pressure on the sector to improve themselves, increase productivity because right now they are not competitive,” he said, noting in particular that the cost of producing rice was much higher than world prices of the staple.
Agriculture, Diokno pointed out, expanded by just 0.8 percent in 2018 and contributed a measly 0.1 percentage point to full-year gross domestic product growth of 6.2 percent.
“Simply put, the farm sector had virtually zero contribution to economic growth last year,” he said.
Agriculture Secretary Emmanuel Piñol, meanwhile, urged the government to implement intervention programs to protect farmers against a surge in imports.
Amid Diokno’s call for a shift from rice farming, the Agriculture chief said productivity could be improved via the use of the proposed P10-billion Competitiveness Enhancement Fund.
“If the interventions will be given right away and our farmers will be given enough time to make use of those interventions to improve their productivity, yes, our farmers could compete,” he said.
“But if we immediately implement liberalization even before the interventions could reach our farmers and even before they could improve their productivity, it could lead to the death of the rice industry,” Piñol added.
Valuing our rice farmers
·      
One of the powerful lessons to be learned from the Venezuela situation is the absolute need for countries to invest in developing a productive and sustainable agricultural sector. While oil money can finance a lot of imported food, any number of circumstances including price movements and geo-political events could very quickly create conditions that could result in starvation when a people cannot feed themselves.
This week’s appearance of officials of the National Flour Mills (NFM) before a Joint Select Committee (JSC) of Parliament gave more reason for Trinidad and Tobago to worry about food security. NFM figures last month indicated a precipitous fall in rice production over the last 27 years, from 21,200 tonnes to 585 tonnes. In some economies, a decline of such magnitude might have prompted a policy-supported switch to alternative locally grown staples, such as breadfruit or the root crops of yam, dasheen, cassava, sweet potatoes or eddoes. Instead, the T&T solution has been to import more rice to meet the high domestic demand. Naturally, this required an ever-rising commitment of precious foreign exchange.
While the NFM has attributed the fallen production to the removal of farmers from the Nariva Swamp, Minister Rambharat, in his appearance before the JSC placed the responsibility on the closure of Caroni (1975) Ltd, the mainstay sugar producer which had also diversified into other food crop farming. Neither analysis went to the root of the problem which is the consistent mishandling of agriculture by every government since Independence, none of which has developed and executed an effective national food security and agricultural export plan.
The minister’s attitude towards rice farmers revealed a lack of sensitivity about the forces against which farmers have always worked, not the least of which is cheap imports. The issue is not, as he stated, that 95 per cent of the local rice sold to NFM goes to market as pet rice but why it ends up there. Is there some inherent deficiency in the rice grown in this country? What is needed from Minister Rambharat is a cogent and penetrating analysis of why the rice industry has fallen to such a low, and for NFM to explain its handling of locally produced rice.
Ultimately, the issue is whether Trinidad and Tobago is satisfied to keep importing rice or sees rice as a strategic food worthy of investment.
The public’s appetite for rice in a country where foreign exchange is already scarce and highly dependent on the finite petro resources would suggest a less cavalier attitude to rice farmers and the rice industry, and a more strategic approach to either developing T&T’s rice industry and/or changing consumption patterns.
Get caught up with news from the

Fil-Chi biz chamber backs rice tariffication

 February 13, 2019, 5:56 pm
MANILA -- The Federation of Filipino-Chinese Chamber of Commerce and Industry (FFCCCII) has joined other business groups in expressing full support for the proposed law seeking to impose tariffs on rice imports in lieu of quantitative restrictions (QR), which it believes is a “much-needed reform” that will ease negative effects of inflation especially on the poorest of the poor, the Department of Finance (DOF) revealed in a statement on Wednesday.
In a letter to President Duterte, the FFCCCII said the rice tariffication bill will benefit the lowest-income families as this staple food accounts for a hefty part of their daily household expense.
“Rice is the staple food of our nation and it comprises almost 20 percent of the household expense of low-income households. We believe that by removing the import quotas on rice and replacing them with tariffs, the price of rice will significantly be lower as there will be competition, and the lack of available cheap rice will no longer be an issue,” said the FFCCCII in the letter signed by its president, Domingo Yap.
A copy of the letter was also sent to Finance Secretary Carlos Dominguez III, who believes that this import liberalization measure will help the government further ease inflation.
The group likewise pointed out that the rice tariffication bill will ensure that local farmers would also benefit from this consumer-friendly measure through the creation of a Rice Competitiveness Enhancement Fund (RCEF), which will provide them with assistance programs, loans, grants, and aid needed to modernize rice farming as well as funds for the development of inbred rice seeds and skills enhancement.
“This measure is a much-needed reform that will help our countrymen,” the FFCCCII said ahead of the President’s expected signing into law of the rice tarrification bill.
Earlier, a joint statement was signed by nine other business organizations also expressing their support for rice tariffication. (DOF PR)

Battle for food


Description: Battle for food
The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations that leads international efforts to defeat hunger. In 2018, it reported that for the third year in a row, “there has been a rise in world hunger. The absolute number of undernourished people, i.e. those facing chronic food deprivation, has increased to nearly 821 million in 2017, from around 804 million in 2016. These are levels from almost a decade ago.”
I cite these figures if only to emphasize the importance of agriculture, and how not only the Philippines but the rest of the world has been fighting hunger. Sadly, in the last three years, it appears to be a losing battle. And this, according to FAO, was largely because of climate change and the negative impact of natural disasters like drought on agricultural production.
Description: Marvin A. TortThis is the situation the world finds itself in right now, and I suppose one shouldn’t be surprised by the sense of urgency of some sectors in lobbying for changes in policies in Philippine agriculture. Former government technocrats, for instance, have been pushing for a “rice tariffication” law that they believe could “help resolve various issues afflicting the rice industry, including smuggling, uncompetitive production costs, and corruption.”
BusinessWorld reported that through a statement issued by the Foundation for Economic Freedom, the former technocrats noted that allowing the free importation of rice but imposing tariffs on them — as opposed to the present system of a government monopoly on importing rice and restricting the quantities brought in — would “be the most far-reaching reform in the history of rice policy. For decades, the interventionist strategy has been tried, tested, and has repeatedly failed.”
The group criticized “unwarranted government intervention” in the rice trade and noted that “by liberalizing the industry, the syndicate controlling the value chain will now be nullified by free entry and competition — including entry and competition from foreign rice suppliers.” The objective, they noted, was to allow free market forces to solve “the problem of gluts during harvest, and releasing stocks during lean periods.”
The government, obviously, is now between a rock and a hard place. And in an election year at that. Farmers, whether of rice or sugar or other crops, are voters, too. On one hand, we have economists and other experts who believe in the policy of liberalizing the agriculture sector to pave the way for its growth. But, farmer themselves are opposed to this idea.
BusinessWorld reported that the Federation of Free Farmers (FFF), for instance, is worried that by liberalizing the rice industry and removing the government monopoly on importing rice, and restricting the state to maintaining a minimum rice inventory, then the government would be “practically powerless” when rice prices turn volatile in case of another shortage.
Even sugar farmers are up in arms versus liberalizing their own industry, or allowing the private sector — particularly food makers — to import more sugar and sugar substitutes. They noted that the majority of sugar farmers were Agrarian Reform Beneficiaries (ARBs), and pushing for liberalization would only increase their poverty.
BusinessWorld reported on a position paper of the Confederation of Sugar Producers (CONFED), which said, “It is ironic that the government, after providing the opportunity for these former sugar workers to become producers through the agrarian reform law will — through these economic managers — consign them once more to poverty by concocting this liberalization plan.”
There appears to be much anxiety in the agriculture sector now, given the calls to open up the trade of rice and sugar. The obvious objective of such calls is to ensure food security. Liberalization and free trade aim to ensure sufficient food supply, given the growing demand for food of an increasing population. Sufficient supply will also help keep food prices down. Free trade aims to address supply disruptions. But apparently farmers believe this to be at their expense.
However, farmers are consumers, too, like the rest of us. While they need income, like the rest of us as well, they also need food. And the negative consequence of supply disruptions, as what we had experienced last year, was felt by everybody — farmers and food processors and consumers alike. Runaway prices, shortages, inflation, and slower economic growth affected us all. Farmers were hit both on income and consumption.
Protecting the livelihood of farmers, and ensuring their profitability, should not be at the expense of consumers. And it is precisely the prevailing mechanism of trading that needs to change, as it has allowed unscrupulous traders to benefit from supply disruptions. They have kept farmers poor, and have made food expensive even for them.
The situation is not without alternatives to farmers. We can risk opening up the rice and sugar trade to foreign supply. But we should provide rice and sugar farmers alternative sources of income — if at all liberalization will result in diminished incomes for them. However, both the rice and sugar industry should modernize and improve on production and efficiency. The country needs food, and so does the rest of the world. The 2018 hunger report proves this much.
We have Singapore’s Agriculture and Veterinary Agency (AVA) now in the country to inspect farms that can supply Singapore with vegetables, fruit, hogs, poultry, and eggs. Singapore has been searching for alternatives to food imports from Malaysia, particularly for high-value vegetables and fruit, pork and processed pork products, dressed chicken and eggs, and seafood including white shrimp. Our exports are also seen to address any domestic oversupply in the future.
On the production front, BusinessWorld also reported that Israeli agro-industrial firm LR Group is expected to submit a P44-billion proposal to the Philippine government this month to fund the deployment of 6,200 Solar-Powered Irrigation Systems (SPIS). LR’s “fertigation” technology — the injection of fertilizers using the irrigation system — is seen to help double production in about 500,000 hectares of rice and high-value products like sugarcane, corn, coffee, cacao, coconuts, and fruit-bearing trees.
I believe that all is not lost for Agriculture. But government policy and type of intervention play an important role in all this. A World Bank-funded project in Mindanao, for instance, called the Philippine Rural Development Project (PRDP), is targeting a 30% increase in income for its beneficiaries before the end of its sixth year of implementation in 2020.
BusinessWorld reported that PRDP has so far monitored a 15% income improvement since its launch in 2014, particularly among the 700,000 beneficiaries of farm-to-market road projects that allowed farmers to directly bring their produce to the market with ease. PRDP is composed of 248 projects in Mindanao, and provided P15.4 billion for infrastructure development, agri-enterprises, and local capacity improvement.
PRDP proves that the plight of farmers can be improved, that farming can also be profitable, as long as the right infrastructure and the right policies are in place. There will always be demand for food, and this is highly unlikely to diminish in the future. In short, even as we import, there will always be a market for local farm produce. The key to success is finding ways to improve production, and distribution to markets here and abroad. There are almost 900 million undernourished people around the world.

Indigenous researchers plant seeds of hope for health and climate

Hannah Tait Neufeld, Assistant Professor of Family Relations and Applied Nutrition, University of Guelph; Brittany Luby, Assistant Professor of History, University of Guelph, and Kim Anderson, Associate Professor of Family Relations and Applied Nutrition,
February 13, 2019
12:09 PM EST
Last Updated
February 13, 2019
12:10 PM EST
This article was originally published on The Conversation, an independent and nonprofit source of news, analysis and commentary from academic experts. Disclosure information is available on the original site.
——
Authors: Hannah Tait Neufeld, Assistant Professor of Family Relations and Applied Nutrition, University of Guelph; Brittany Luby, Assistant Professor of History, University of Guelph, and Kim Anderson, Associate Professor of Family Relations and Applied Nutrition, University of Guelph
As we learn more about climate change, this knowledge can be paralyzing, especially for young people who are contemplating life pathways.
Indigenous land-based learning offers an avenue for hope, embedded in action. This approach has been taken up in recent years by a number of post-secondary institutions in Canada and internationally.
This is the focus of our work — as mixed ancestry (Hannah), Anishinaabe (Brittany) and Metis (Kim) scholars at the University of Guelph in Ontario. According to Indigenous ways of knowing, we are only as healthy as our environments. And so our research addresses sustainable food practices that feed the well-being of “all our relations:” human, land, spirit.
Using food as a starting point for action, we have launched a community-based research program — to promote conversations and opportunities across geographic and social spaces that forge and rekindle relationships focused on traditional foodways.
This work starts with relationships, and it involves labour — both of which are critical to Indigenous pedagogy. With Indigenous community partners, we engage social science, nutrition and engineering students in hands-on work in Indigenous food and medicine gardens and in manomin (wild rice) fields.
This enables us to focus on time-honoured relationships in our homelands and university lands while preparing for the future.
‘Green shoots that grow after a fire’
The relationship that Indigenous peoples have with the land encourages practices and traditions that perpetuate healthy families and communities. On- and off-reserve, momentum is building and communities want to be involved in building opportunities for learning and social interactions around food.
In collaboration with other Indigenous faculty, students and a growing urban network, we have been working to expand gardens in the wider Grand River Territory and at the University of Guelph — on the ancestral lands of the Attawandaron people and the treaty lands and Territory of the Mississaugas of the Credit. We work together to strengthen land-based relationships and local food sovereignty.
In an effort to address community needs in southwestern Ontario, our on-going research is designed to engage a diverse group of partners, collaborators and knowledge users. Garden sites have been established with the assistance of the local Indigenous community at the University of Guelph Arboretum — to address food access and knowledge barriers and explore innovative land-based education and practices.
Since the spring of 2018, a group of committed community members, faculty and students have planted and nurtured edible and medicinal plants. The gardens are known collectively as Wisahkotewinowak, which means “green shoots that grow after a fire.”
The garden brings together community agencies such as: the Grand River Metis Council, White Owl Native Ancestry Association and Global Youth Volunteer Network. Elder-led workshops on medicinal plants, and preservation methods have taken place throughout the four seasons.
This project has strengthened inter-generational and inter-regional relationships. Using food as a starting point, conversations and opportunities for sharing allow people to share their knowledge and to forge relationships with the land and each other.
Histories of loss offer clues for regrowth
In some cases, however, environmental change has limited the ability of Elders to pass on traditional knowledge through hands-on activities such as planting and harvesting foods.
Such is the case at Dalles 38C Indian Reserve from which Brittany’s Anishinaabe ancestors originate. Upstream and downstream dams control the flows into and out of the Winnipeg River which runs through the reserve.
Water depths within manomin (wild rice) habitats have been altered by hydroelectric development and continue to be subject to fluctuations during the growing season that do not resemble the natural patterns to which manomin adapted.
Discharges from upstream sources have also affected sediment and water quality. These sources include the community of Kenora and a pulp and paper mill which ceased operation in the 2000s.
Researchers at the University of Guelph have partnered with the Economic Development Committee at Dalles 38C Indian Reserve to determine which factors are limiting the growth of manomin and to develop management strategies to control these factors.
The traditional knowledge of Elders — shared through interviews and river tours — aids in understanding the historical relationship between water fluctuations, urban discharge and the growth of manomin.
By combining traditional knowledge of manomin with more recent observations about riverine change, youth involved in the research can begin to understand that histories of loss may, indeed, provide clues for regrowth. This changed lens results in a future-oriented view of the Winnipeg River that challenges the nature and duration of settler-industrial landscapes.
Elder knowledge allows youth to envision compromised fields as productive Anishinaabe spaces.
All our Relations
University research and teaching through projects like the Wisaktowinowak gardens and the manomin/wild rice project create new opportunities for youth and Elders to interact, both on campus — by planting seeds — and in Anishinaabe homelands through the revival of traditional harvesting.
It’s the land that brings us together, the land that teaches relationship-based ways of knowing about the natural world and its food systems.
And with the increasing uptake of post-secondary land-based education, we may just change the way upcoming generations envision our environment and shape the future that unfolds on it.
——
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Disclosure information is available on the original site. Read the original article:

Palanisami was engaged by TS to study water requirements under irrigation projects in two States

Hearing in the case related to sharing of Krishna waters by Telangana and Andhra Pradesh States was resumed by the Brijesh Kumar Tribunal, Krishna Water Disputes Tribunal-II, in New Delhi on Wednesday, with counsel for AP A.K. Ganguli cross-examining Telangana’s witness K. Palanisami.

Methodology discussed

An agricultural economist by profession, Mr. Palanisami from Coimbatore in Tamil Nadu was engaged by the Telangana Government to study the water requirements under several irrigation projects in the two States.
The cross-examination of Telangana’s witness by the AP counsel on the day-one revolved around the methodologies adopted in calculating the crop water estimation or irrigation water requirement.
Mr. Palanisami told the tribunal that he and a few scientists of State Agricultural University were also associated with his study and he also had discussions with scientists of Indian Institute of Rice Research (IIRR) and Central Research Institute of Dryland Agriculture (CRIDA), both located in Hyderabad, for the purpose of his exercise on crop water requirement.
The Telangana witness further told the tribunal, on being asked by the counsel for AP, that after examining 4 to 5 methods he along with his associates had agreed upon using the Penman Monteith Method for calculation of crop water requirement stating that the other methods were useful for micro environment in calculating evapo- transporation, the process by which water is transferred from the land to the atmosphere by evaporation from the soil and other surfaces and by transpiration from plants, as part of crop water requirement estimation.

Optimum use of water

He explained to the tribunal that his assignment was basically to work out crop water requirement based on scientific methodology and optimum utilisation of water. For the analysis, he had availed three sets of data – project-wise area, crop-related co-efficient and cropping pattern-cropped area provided by the Irrigation Department of Telangana.
During the hearing, Chief Engineer (Inter State Water Resources) S. Narasimha Rao and other officials of the Irrigation Department of Telangana were present.

Mississippi Rice Council Annual Meeting:  What's Done and What's Next  
By Deborah Willenborg

CLEVELAND, MS -- Torrential rain gave way to the annual Mississippi Rice Council meeting here yesterday with more than 30 growers hearing reports from Mississippi State, the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), Ducks Unlimited, and USA Rice.

Mississippi Rice Council President Kirk Satterfield thanked attendees and provided a quick overview of Mississippi Rice Promotion Board activities, including praising the hard work of Extension Agent Coordinator Laura Giaccaglia for the successful Annual Rice Tasting Luncheon, now in its 28th year and working with 14 restaurants in Bolivar County to ensure rice was featured on all their menus throughout National Rice Month.

Delta Research & Extension Center Rice Specialist Dr. Bobby Golden then walked through the work his office, researchers, and students are performing.  He reported that acreage trended up in 2018 but that yield remained somewhat flat.  He shared results of impact on yield for various herbicides and fungicides, and rice tolerance to other crop protection products.  Golden, who was just named to the Rice Leadership Development Program in December, also gave a first glimpse at planting projections, estimating state acreage would be around 130,000 acres this year.

Betsy Ward, president & CEO of USA Rice, thanked the Council for their continued support of USA Rice and updated attendees on key trade issues, including strong trade with Iraq thanks to the Memorandum of Understanding between the U.S. and Iraq that USA Rice advocated for; the situation in China that could finally see some sales of U.S. rice to the huge nation; and the positive impacts of the U.S-Colombia Free Trade Agreement, that in addition to regular strong sales of rice has also sent more than $3.6 million to Mississippi for rice research over the past six years.

Ward also talked about the quick rise to dominance of U.S. rice in international food aid feeding programs thanks to fortified rice, and the partnership between USA Rice and USDA's Foreign Agriculture Service (FAS) that helps promote U.S. rice overseas.

"In addition to receiving $4 million from FAS to fund our programs this year, we also advocated for and received additional relief for the rice industry that has been negatively impacted by the various trade disputes going on," she said.  "We secured $48 million in additional rice purchases for domestic feeding programs and another $3 million over three years to support international efforts on behalf of rice.  We're grateful to Secretary of Agriculture Sonny Perdue for this assistance, he has been a great friend to the rice industry."



Think Rice truck tour last fall
at a stop in Cleveland, MS

USA Rice Vice President of Domestic Promotion Michael Klein discussed the work his team is performing on behalf of the industry including last year's Think Rice Road Trip that made several stops in Mississippi, promoting important nutritional research that the Mississippi Rice Promotion Board helped fund, fighting rice pretenders, and the very successful Foodservice Farm & Mill Tour that took place in Louisiana in 2018 and will come to Mississippi for 2019.

"My team and I are responsible for promotions in the single largest market for U.S. rice," Klein said.  "We wake up every day and think about how we can make people eat more U.S.-grown rice.  Frankly, it's a great job and we are excited to undertake it on your behalf."

The 2018 Farm Bill, soon to enter the implementation phase, was the focus of USA Rice Vice President of Government Affairs Ben Mosely's talk.

"Rice's position in the new Farm Bill actually improved with enhancements to the Price Loss Coverage (PLC) program and an expanded definition of family that can now qualify for assistance both of which were developed by the USA Rice Farm Policy Task Force that had dozens of calls and meetings and included Mississippi farmers Gibb Steele, Nolen Canon, and Kirk Satterfield," he said.
 
Mosely also talked about the Rice Stewardship Partnership Program that has reaped great benefits for Mississippi, analysis of the sustainability record of the U.S. rice industry, and the newly launched USA Rice Conservation Program Search Tool that lives on the USA Rice website.

Paul Rodrigue from USDA-NRCS and Ducks Unlimited's Dr. Scott Manley rounded out the program by encouraging attendees to consider enrolling in a Mississippi Surface Water Conservation Program that will provide financial and technical assistance to producers.

"It's always great to be back in Mississippi, surrounded by friendly faces and sharing the important and exciting work we are doing on behalf of the industry," Ward said.  "As always, we appreciate the time on the agenda and thoroughly enjoyed the other presentations as well."
USA RICE DAILY
Exporters blame EU tariffs for 5 pct drop in rice shipments
Rice exports in January saw a small decline that exporters have blamed on the European Union’s decision last month to impose tariffs on local rice. Last month, Cambodia exported 59,625 tonnes of rice to international markets, a 5 percent drop compared to January 2018, according to a report issued yesterday by the Secretariat of One Window Service for Rice Export Formality. The same report points out that the EU bought 20,000 tonnes of Cambodian rice in January, which is around 40 percent of all Cambodian rice exports. China bought about the same amount.
In January, the European Commission decided to re-impose tariffs on rice coming from Cambodia and Myanmar to protect farmers in Europe, whom the European Union believed to be at a disadvantage.
During the first year, the EU is levying 175 euros ($199.5) per tonne on imports of Cambodian rice. 150 euros ($171) will be charged in the second year, and 125 euros ($142.5) in the last. Hun Lak, vice president of Cambodia Rice Federation, said orders of Cambodian rice abroad saw a decline last month because international buyers were busy preparing for holidays like the Chinese New Year and the Vietnamese New Year, but also because the EU tariffs went into effect. “These factors led to a slight decline in rice exports,” he said, adding that rice exports to the EU remained large because a lot of European buyers had placed their orders before the tariffs kicked in.Cambodian rice. KT/Chor SokuntheaHe said the real impact of the tariffs will be felt in February and following months, but had some room for optimism.
Exports to the EU are likely to decrease, but it will really depend on whether consumers continue to choose Cambodian rice despite the price increase. We have to wait and see,” he said.
Mr Lak stressed the need to diversify away from the EU market and to make local rice more competitive internationally by reducing production costs. Chan Sokheang, chairman and CEO of Signatures of Asia, said the 5 percent decline was not alarming, adding that the worst is still to come. He estimated that last month only 20 to 25 percent of Cambodian rice shipped to Europe was taxed. “What really worries us is February and March, when the tariffs will have a bigger impact. We hope the loss in shipments to the EU can be offset by more exports to China.”
Mr Sokheang said his company did not see a drop in sales in January but that it is likely to be a different story this month.
Another rice exporter contacted by Khmer Times and who asked for anonymity said, “Exports decreased last month because the EU is our biggest buyer. Unfortunately, the tariffs are likely to have a much larger impact in upcoming months. “Our company saw a 3 to 4 percent decline in orders from the EU in January,” the exporter said, adding that some European buyers are now choosing to buy rice from producers in Thailand and Vietnam instead of Cambodia. Cambodia exported 626,225 tonnes of rice to international markets in 2018, a drop of 1.5 percent compared to 2017.


THAI CABINET NOD TO ASSISTANCE FOR RICE FARMERS
BANGKOK (NNT) - The Cabinet meeting on Tuesday approved budget of more than 275 million baht to help rice farmers and maintain the quality of Jasmine rice.   Apart from a 275 million-baht budget, the Cabinet approved a project to maintain the quantity and quality of Thai Jasmine rice for the 2019/2020 production year. The budget will be spent on rice grain for the farmers whose rice was damaged during the 2018-2019 production year. Five kilos of rice grain/rai will be given to the farmers.   The Cabinet approved the 4th road safety master plan which focuses on developing a road safety system and promoting a safety culture. The plan also seeks to reduce the number of road accident fatalities among at-risk groups. Prime Minister Prayut Chan-o-cha instructed relevant units to use technology to manage traffic with a focus on areas with traffic congestion.   As for public health, the meeting approved 19.1 billion baht for the national health security fund for the fiscal year 2020 to ensure the availability of more medical treatments for people in need.   Regarding the establishment of the Rail Department, the Cabinet approved drafts of ministerial regulations for the department. The ministerial regulations are expected to be enforced mid April 2019. The law authorizing the department’s establishment has been submitted to His Majesty the King to be signed.
Time needed to adjust to rice tariffication — IRRI
Description: rice palay IRRITIME is needed to prepare rice farmers for the adjustment to heightened competition to be brought by rice tariffication, the head of the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) said. “Clearly, the liberalization process exposes long-term the industry to more international competition,” IRRI Director General Matthew Morell said on Wednesday during the signing of a memorandum of understanding (MoU) with the Department of Agriculture (DA) on scientific and technical collaboration in support of enhancing the Philippine rice industry’s competitiveness. “Time is needed to adjust and some of the ability, from our perspective — the research and development work at IRRI and PhilRice — does need to be nurtured through enhanced education and training,” Mr. Morell added. Agriculture Secretary Emmanuel F. Piñol said that interventions to support farmers should reach them before the tariffication starts. “If the interventions are ready right away and our farmers are given enough time to make use of those interventions to improve their productivity, yes our farmers can compete. But if we immediately implement liberalization even before the interventions can reach our farmers and even before they can improve their productivity, it would lead to the death of the rice industry,” Mr. Piñol said. He did not elaborate on the required lead time to prepare farmers for competition. Among the interventions contemplated under the Rice Competitiveness Enhancement Fund (RCEF) are equipment and mechanization, rice crop financing, and assistance with marketing and training. “Right now, the farmers are complaining even without liberalized importation. There is speculation among the traders and they’re not buying palay right now, so the price of palay (unmilled rice) has dropped to P14 to P15 per kilo from a high of P25 last year,” Mr. Piñol said. “The IRRI is both a source of pride for the Philippines and a reason for embarrassment. Why? We take pride in the fact that we host the research institution that has developed the world’s rice industry. But we’re embarrassed by the fact that even with the presence of IRRI in our midst and our own PhilRice, we have not yet attained that dream of rice self sufficiency. We can’t even produce enough rice for ourselves,” Mr. Piñol said. Mr. Piñol added he has discussed with banks the possibility of providing more loan support to farmers. According to Mr. Piñol, the banks have insufficient guidance from the government in lending to the agricultural industry. Meanwhile, the Federation of Filipino-Chinese Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FFCCCII) said on Wednesday that the rice tariffication is a “much-needed” reform to curb inflation especially among those living in poverty. “Rice is the staple food of our nation and it comprises almost 20% of the household expense of low-income households. We believe that by removing the import quotas on rice and replacing them with tariffs, the price of rice will significantly be lower as there will be competition and the lack of available cheap rice will no longer be an issue,” the FFCCCII said in a letter addressed to President Rodrigo R. Duterte. “This measure is a much-needed reform that will help our countrymen,” the FFCIII stated in the letter. — Reicelene Joy N. Ignacio
12 hybrid rice varieties to be available from July
Description: WOMEN sowing rice in a field on the outskirts of Lahore. Of the 130 rice varieties developed in the country, at least 12 are already being sown by farmers.—Dawn file photoISLAMABAD: At least twelve new hybrid rice ­varieties will be available to farmers for cultivation ­during the next Kharif crop season starting in July. The new varieties were approved by the Variety Evaluation Committee of Pakistan Agriculture Coun­cil (Parc) in Islamabad on Wednesday after reviewing twenty-six proposals. Research on these varieties was carried out at the rice research laboratory of National Agriculture Research Centre. A senior official of NARC told Dawn that following the approval by the committee, the new hybrids of rice can now be imported from China. So far, 130 different varieties of rice have been developed of which at least twelve varieties are currently sown by farmers in rice growing areas of the country. Punjab is the largest in terms of the crop’s production, followed by Sindh and then the remaining parts. In addition to the 12 types, an open pollinated variety of rice for commercial cultivation was also approved by the committee. While farmers can keep seeds of pollinated rice variety, the hybrid has to be changed after every crop. Parc chairman briefed the committee about the upcoming projects on rice under the Prime Minister’s ‘National Agriculture Emergency Programme’. Presiding over the variety evaluation committee meeting, Member Plant Sciences Division of PARC, Dr Abdul Ghafoor emphasised the role of quality seed for productivity and profitability of farmers. Representatives of seed companies appreciated the role of Parc for setting new benchmarks for testing of rice varieties in Pakistan. Published in Dawn, February 14th, 2019
Time needed to adjust to rice tariffication — IRRI
February 13, 2019 | 10:03 pm
Description: rice palay IRRIPHILSTAR
TIME is needed to prepare rice farmers for the adjustment to heightened competition to be brought by rice tariffication, the head of the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) said.
“Clearly, the liberalization process exposes long-term the industry to more international competition,” IRRI Director General Matthew Morell said on Wednesday during the signing of a memorandum of understanding (MoU) with the Department of Agriculture (DA) on scientific and technical collaboration in support of enhancing the Philippine rice industry’s competitiveness.
“Time is needed to adjust and some of the ability, from our perspective — the research and development work at IRRI and PhilRice — does need to be nurtured through enhanced education and training,” Mr. Morell added.
Agriculture Secretary Emmanuel F. Piñol said that interventions to support farmers should reach them before the tariffication starts.
“If the interventions are ready right away and our farmers are given enough time to make use of those interventions to improve their productivity, yes our farmers can compete. But if we immediately implement liberalization even before the interventions can reach our farmers and even before they can improve their productivity, it would lead to the death of the rice industry,” Mr. Piñol said.
He did not elaborate on the required lead time to prepare farmers for competition.
Among the interventions contemplated under the Rice Competitiveness Enhancement Fund (RCEF) are equipment and mechanization, rice crop financing, and assistance with marketing and training.
“Right now, the farmers are complaining even without liberalized importation. There is speculation among the traders and they’re not buying palay right now, so the price of palay (unmilled rice) has dropped to P14 to P15 per kilo from a high of P25 last year,” Mr. Piñol said.
“The IRRI is both a source of pride for the Philippines and a reason for embarrassment. Why? We take pride in the fact that we host the research institution that has developed the world’s rice industry. But we’re embarrassed by the fact that even with the presence of IRRI in our midst and our own PhilRice, we have not yet attained that dream of rice self sufficiency. We can’t even produce enough rice for ourselves,” Mr. Piñol said.
Mr. Piñol added he has discussed with banks the possibility of providing more loan support to farmers. According to Mr. Piñol, the banks have insufficient guidance from the government in lending to the agricultural industry.
Meanwhile, the Federation of Filipino-Chinese Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FFCCCII) said on Wednesday that the rice tariffication is a “much-needed” reform to curb inflation especially among those living in poverty.
“Rice is the staple food of our nation and it comprises almost 20% of the household expense of low-income households. We believe that by removing the import quotas on rice and replacing them with tariffs, the price of rice will significantly be lower as there will be competition and the lack of available cheap rice will no longer be an issue,” the FFCCCII said in a letter addressed to President Rodrigo R. Duterte.
“This measure is a much-needed reform that will help our countrymen,” the FFCIII stated in the letter. — Reicelene Joy N. Ignacio

Exporters blame EU tariffs for 5 pct drop in rice shipments

Sum Manet / Khmer Times  

Rice exports in January saw a small decline that exporters have blamed on the European Union’s decision last month to impose tariffs on local rice.
Last month, Cambodia exported 59,625 tonnes of rice to international markets, a 5 percent drop compared to January 2018, according to a report issued yesterday by the Secretariat of One Window Service for Rice Export Formality.
The same report points out that the EU bought 20,000 tonnes of Cambodian rice in January, which is around 40 percent of all Cambodian rice exports. China bought about the same amount.
. .
In January, the European Commission decided to re-impose tariffs on rice coming from Cambodia and Myanmar to protect farmers in Europe, whom the European Union believed to be at a disadvantage.
During the first year, the EU is levying 175 euros ($199.5) per tonne on imports of Cambodian rice. 150 euros ($171) will be charged in the second year, and 125 euros ($142.5) in the last.
Hun Lak, vice president of Cambodia Rice Federation, said orders of Cambodian rice abroad saw a decline last month because international buyers were busy preparing for holidays like the Chinese New Year and the Vietnamese New Year, but also because the EU tariffs went into effect.
“These factors led to a slight decline in rice exports,” he said, adding that rice exports to the EU remained large because a lot of European buyers had placed their orders before the tariffs kicked in.
Cambodian rice. KT/Chor Sokunthea
He said the real impact of the tariffs will be felt in February and following months, but had some room for optimism.
. .
“Exports to the EU are likely to decrease, but it will really depend on whether consumers continue to choose Cambodian rice despite the price increase. We have to wait and see,” he said.
Mr Lak stressed the need to diversify away from the EU market and to make local rice more competitive internationally by reducing production costs.
Chan Sokheang, chairman and CEO of Signatures of Asia, said the 5 percent decline was not alarming, adding that the worst is still to come.
He estimated that last month only 20 to 25 percent of Cambodian rice shipped to Europe was taxed.
“What really worries us is February and March, when the tariffs will have a bigger impact. We hope the loss in shipments to the EU can be offset by more exports to China.”
. .
Mr Sokheang said his company did not see a drop in sales in January but that it is likely to be a different story this month.
Another rice exporter contacted by Khmer Times and who asked for anonymity said, “Exports decreased last month because the EU is our biggest buyer. Unfortunately, the tariffs are likely to have a much larger impact in upcoming months.
“Our company saw a 3 to 4 percent decline in orders from the EU in January,” the exporter said, adding that some European buyers are now choosing to buy rice from producers in Thailand and Vietnam instead of Cambodia.
Cambodia exported 626,225 tonnes of rice to international markets in 2018, a drop of 1.5 percent compared to 2017.

Guyana denies shipping “bad’ rice to Jamaica

By CMC
February 12, 2019
Description: https://www.stlucianewsonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/RICE.jpgGEORGETOWN, Guyana, Feb 12, CMC – Guyana says it has not shipped any rice to Jamaica under the “Cinderella” brand for the year after media reports in Kingston said that 70 metric tonnes of White Cinderella rice had been confiscated by Jamaican authorities.
The reports said that the rice, valued at valued at approximately J$4.6 million (One Jamaica dollar=US$0.008 cents) had been confiscated after officials from the Ministry of Industries, Agriculture and Fisheries had carried out a series of inspections and finding that the product had signs of mould, clumping, discoloration and wetting.
But the general manager of the Guyana Rice Development Board (GRDB), Nizam Hassa, who has expressed concern over the claims, said no rice has been shipped to Jamaica so far this year, by the miller who packages under the Cinderella brand.
“I am very disturbed by these reports. We have since reached out to the Food Storage and Prevention of Infestation Division in the Ministry of Industry, Commerce, Agriculture and Fisheries in Jamaica and are awaiting a response.
“The situation is puzzling since the last shipment left Guyana on the 15th December and arrived on the 19th December, 2018. Like any other shipment, the rice that was sent to Jamaica underwent a series of physical tests and was certified. The Board conducts such tests on paddy, rice and rice by- products prior to any shipment leaving Guyana,” Hassan said.
GRDB export records also revealed that the supplier, to date, has not received any complaints from the buyer in Jamaica or any other of its markets and has been paid for all rice shipped.
Export reports also indicate no one shipment from the supplier amounted to 70 tonnes.
Hassa said that rice could develop mould if it becomes wet in storage.
“It is very important that the rice be stored in a dry place. Mould and other bacteria can develop on the grain if the rice is exposed to moisture or becomes wet in storage,” Hassan said.
The GRDB said it is urging all players within the industry to remain vigilant as the matter is being investigated.

Arkansas rice production marks recovery from 2017 flooding; hay, peanuts decline

  
Even if the fall of 2018 marked the “harvest that never ended,” Arkansas growers managed to pull enough rice from the land to mark a 30 percent increase over 2017′s disastrous numbers, which reflected the severe flooding of that year’s spring, officials said.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s National Agricultural Statistics Service released state-by-state crop and stock reports Feb. 8, the first new data available from the department since the 35-day partial shutdown of the federal government.
Not only was 2018 a strong year for Arkansas rice growers, with a total production of 107 million cwt, but U.S. rice as a whole, said Jarrod Hardke, Extension rice agronomist for the University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture.
“Arkansas rice yield and acres came right in line with expectation,” Hardke said. “However, it was surprising to see a substantial increase in overall U.S. yields, which marks the second highest on record. Some individual state yields increased more than 800 pounds per acre over previous estimates.”
Some Arkansas crops saw modest year-over-year increases, including corn, which rose 7 percent to 117 million bushels, and upland cotton, which also rose 7 percent to an estimated 1.15 million bales, results that several extension agronomists described as unsurprising, and generally in line with annual averages.
The state’s No. 1 crop, soybean, saw a 7 percent decline in production from 2017, falling to about 165.2 million bushels. The dip was overshadowed by the increasing supply on hand, accumulated in part due to the ongoing trade dispute with China.
Nationwide, total stocks of stored soybeans rose 18 percent over 2017 numbers more than 3.7 billion bushels, stored both on farms and off. Soybean stocks stored on farms, specifically, totaled 1.94 billion bushels, up 30 percent from a year ago.
While the report didn’t make numbers for Arkansas available, the national situation reflected what Arkansas growers are dealing with, said Scott Stiles, Extension economist for the Division of Agriculture.
“Normally, we use the bulk of on-farm storage for corn and rice,” Stiles said. “Given the quality issues, drop in soybean prices and weakness in the basis at harvest, my feeling was that our growers would allocate a lot more bin space to soybeans following the 2018 crop.”
Peanut production in Arkansas dropped about 25 percent in 2018 to about 2.2 million pounds. Travis Faske, extension pathologist and peanut agronomist with the Division of Agriculture, said poor harvesting conditions and the abandonment of several thousand acres in peanut production led to the lower number, although the average yield “was positive, and among the best, compared to other peanut producing states.”
The Feb. 8 report also referenced winter wheat in the state, which is forecast to have the lowest acreage since 1955, at about 120,000 acres. Jason Kelley, extension wheat and feed grains agronomist with the Division of Agriculture, said the numbers were not surprising, “given the very wet fall that prevented most acres from being planted.”
Finally, sorghum, which occupies relatively few acres in the state, nevertheless saw a substantial increase in 2018 of 41 percent, with Arkansas growers producing about 770,000 bushels throughout the year.
To learn about agriculture in Arkansas, contact a local Cooperative Extension Service agent or visit www.uaex.edu. Follow us on Twitter at @UAEX_edu.
The University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture offers all its Extension and Research programs to all eligible persons without discrimination.
— Ryan McGeeney is with the U of A System Division of Agriculture.

ARMM distributes P35-M equipment to corn, rice farmers

By Edwin Fernandez/PNA
FARM AID. One of the equipment handed over by agriculture officials to farmers in Maguindanao on Tuesday. (DAF-ARMM photo)
COTABATO CITY — The Department of Agriculture and Fisheries in the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao (DAF-ARMM) has conducted the mass distribution of PHP35-million worth of farming machinery in Maguindanao on Tuesday.
DAF-ARMM Secretary Alexander Alonto Jr. led the distribution of the equipment at the DAF-ARMM Integrated Agricultural Research Center (IARC) compound in Barangay Simuay, Sultan Kudarat, Maguindanao.
“The DAF interventions were composed of 80 units of rice and corn farm machinery given to 18 legitimate cooperatives in the province of Maguindanao,” Alonto said.
Edna Bajao, the regional rice alternate focal person, said the rice farm machinery was composed of several hand tractors, a thresher machine, a floating tiller, a transplanter, a portable irrigation system open source (PISOS) reaper, and a combine harvester.
The corn farm equipment, meanwhile, consisted of an electrical corn mill, a corn sheller, a cassava grater and another potable PISOS reaper, according to regional corn coordinator Dr. Albert Usman.
Alonto said his office also distributed 1,600 liters of insecticides, 1,600 kg. of fungicide and 550 sachets of rodenticides to the farming cooperatives.
Sittie Anida Tomawis Limbona, DAF-ARMM administration and finance chief, said of the total PHP35-million assistance, PHP22 million was allocated for rice farmers while the remaining PHP13 million was for corn farmers.
She said the assistance was funded by the Department of Agriculture.

ARMM distributes P35-M equipment to corn, rice farmers
By Edwin Fernandez  February 13, 2019, 10:01 pm
Description: http://files.pna.gov.ph/category-list/2019/02/13/agri-equpment.png
FARM AID. One of the equipment handed over by agriculture officials to farmers in Maguindanao on Tuesday. (DAF-ARMM photo)
 COTABATO CITY -- The Department of Agriculture and Fisheries in the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao (DAF-ARMM) has conducted the mass distribution of PHP35-million worth of farming machinery in Maguindanao on Tuesday.

DAF-ARMM Secretary Alexander Alonto Jr. led the distribution of the equipment at the DAF-ARMM Integrated Agricultural Research Center (IARC) compound in Barangay Simuay, Sultan Kudarat, Maguindanao.

“The DAF interventions were composed of 80 units of rice and corn farm machinery given to 18 legitimate cooperatives in the province of Maguindanao,” Alonto said.

Edna Bajao, the regional rice alternate focal person, said the rice farm machinery was composed of several hand tractors, a thresher machine, a floating tiller, a transplanter, a portable irrigation system open source (PISOS) reaper, and a combine harvester.

The corn farm equipment, meanwhile, consisted of an electrical corn mill, a corn sheller, a cassava grater and another potable PISOS reaper, according to regional corn coordinator Dr. Albert Usman.

Alonto said his office also distributed 1,600 liters of insecticides, 1,600 kg. of fungicide and 550 sachets of rodenticides to the farming cooperatives.

Sittie Anida Tomawis Limbona, DAF-ARMM administration and finance chief, said of the total PHP35-million assistance, PHP22 million was allocated for rice farmers while the remaining PHP13 million was for corn farmers.

She said the assistance was funded by the Department of Agriculture. (PNA)

Pakistan-Malaysia business relationship: an overview

Pak-Malaysia Business Council is playing a vital role in facilitating the business between the two countries. Pakistan and Malaysia have strong business relationship since 1970 when Pakistan imported palm oil from Malaysia for the first time.

Malaysia entered into joint ventures in Pakistan in the field of power, telecommunication, oil exploration, edible oil refinery, dedicated jetty and the largest bulking storage facility at Port Qasim. Dr Mahathir Bin Mohammad, the then Prime Minister of Malaysia, initiated in the year 1993, three Joint Venture Projects with three Malaysian Palm Oil giants, namely FELDA, K. L. Kepong & IOI with Pakistan's Westbury Group of Companies. By the grace of Allah, all the three joint ventures of Pakistan with Malaysia have performed very well.

The Pak-Malaysia Business Council welcomes the forthcoming visit of Dr Mahathir bin Mohammad to Pakistan next month. Dr Mahathir is a visionary person and has a huge following in Pakistan. The following table will reflect export to and import from Malaysia (mainly Palm Oil):-







===============================================



                    (Million US$)



===============================================



Year    Export from   Import from       Balance



          Pakistan      Malaysia       of Trade



===============================================



2012        252.4       1,855.9       (1,603.5)



2013        219.0       1,653.6       (1,434.7)



2014        227.4       1,215.7         (988.3)



2015        229.0       1,058.1         (829.0)



2016        171.6       1,170.2         (998.6)



2017        167.4       1,176.8       (1,009.3)



===============================================



In this connection, I must state that Palm Oil is the cheapest edible oil in the world and Pakistan is benefited by this oil imported from Malaysia and Indonesia.

Pakistan imports of Palm Oil are continuously increasing. It was about 2.57 million tons in the year 2016, which increased to 3.14 Million tons in 2018.

Malaysia has consistently been the top exporters of palm oil to Pakistan during past three decades. However, from 2014, Malaysian share is continuously declining while Indonesian share is increasing, as would appear from the following statistics:-







==============================================================================



Calendar               Total         Share of Malaysia      Share of Indonesia



Year                 Imports



              (Million/Tons)          (Million/Tons)            (Million/Tons)



                                                %age                      %age



==============================================================================



2014                   2.321   0.637         (27.5%)     1.684         (72.5%)



2015                   1.569   0.349           (22%)     1.220           (78%)



2016                   2.410   0.443           (18%)     1.968           (82%)



2017                   2.829   0.577           (20%)     2.252           (80%)



2018 (Jan-Sep)         2.083   0.601           (29%)     1.482           (71%)



==============================================================================


The main reason is due to aggressive Indonesian sales in the Pakistani market after G2G Preferred Trade Agreement (PTA) with Indonesia.

The exports from Malaysia have decreased viz-a-viz Indonesia for various reasons, including more competitive prices by Indonesia and aggressive sales policy from Indonesian sellers, GAPKI.

Pakistan has established many edible oil refineries mostly at Port Qasim, with a view to converting crude palm oil into refined oil (called RBD Palm Oil).

The Malaysian government has levied Export Duty on Crude Palm Oil (CPO) at certain level of prices (at above RM 2,250), which also discourage export of CPO. Therefore, for increase in export of Palm Oil from Malaysia, Export Duty on CPO needs to be removed/rationalized by Malaysian Government, which will increase the sale of Malaysian Palm Oil by at least 20 percent.

Indonesia also discourages sale of crude palm oil to Pakistan.

Pak-Malaysia Business Council has noted that Prime Minister Imran Khan recently visited Malaysia and had meetings with the Prime Minister of Malaysia, Dr Mahathir, who is always a well-wisher and friend of Pakistan. The Advisor of Prime Minister for Commerce, Textile, Industry and Investment, Abdul Razzak Dawood accompanied the Prime Minister along with the Finance Minister and others.

In view of the trade deficit, they urged the Malaysian government to review the trade imbalance with a view to taking all necessary steps to improve the position.

Pakistan is a big supplier of IRRI and Basmati rice and the Malaysian requirement is of 1,000,000 M.Tons annually for domestic consumption. The share of Pakistan is not more than 200,000 Tons. We would request the Malaysian government to enhance the quota of Pakistani rice export to Malaysia, at competitive prices.

Pakistan also has keen interest to export Halal food, fruits, mango and mandarin, vegetable, etc. Incidentally, Malaysia has imposed 5 to 7% duties on import of mango and mandarin, which need to be reviewed.

Pakistan welcomes Joint Ventures in Malaysia, apart from additional industry like:

-- Edible Oil,

-- Halal Food,

-- Infrastructure Development,

-- Telecommunication,

-- Palm Oil Plantation

The investment policy of Pakistan is most attractive and foreigner can invest 100% in most industries, except infrastructure.

Pakistan High Commission in Malaysia has played a vital role in establishing Malaysia-Pakistan Business Council which is headed by Dato' Seri Nazir Merselam. The Pak-Malaysia Business Council of Federation of Pakistan Chambers of Commerce & Industry has invited a delegation from Malaysia in the 2nd half of this year, mainly to enhance possibility of export goods from Pakistan.

Pak-Malaysia Business intends to hold a one-country exhibition and an investment conference in Kuala Lumpur to boost joint ventures between the two brotherly countries.

Pak-Malaysia Business Council shall endeavour to make its best towards enhancing bilateral, economic and trade relations between Pakistan and Malaysia.

(The writer is Chairman, Pak-Malaysia Business Council of Federation of Pakistan Chambers of Commerce & Industry)

Pakistan to seek preferential trade agreement with Saudi Arabia during Crown Prince Salman's visit

World Press Trust of India 

Islamabad: Pakistan will propose to Saudi Arabia for initiation of a dialogue on a preferential trade agreement (PTA) to balance bilateral trade and promote investment during Saudi Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman's visit here, according to a media report on Thursday.
The Crown Prince accompanied by a high-powered business delegation will arrive in Pakistan on Saturday on his two-day visit to promote economic ties.
The preferential treaty will cover tariff and non-tariff barriers (NTBs) which will help diversify Pakistan's export basket to the kingdom, official sources told Dawn.
Since 2006, there is a complete deadlock in negotiations on the proposed free trade agreement (FTA) with the Gulf Cooperation Council. So far only two rounds of negotiations have been held on it. Officials said that this issue will be raised during the crown prince's visit.
Description: File image of Pakistan prime minister Imran Khan. Reuters
File image of Pakistan prime minister Imran Khan. Reuters
Pakistan's bilateral trade with Saudi Arabia has posted a consistent decline, dropping by a half to USD 2.5 billion in 2016-17 from USD 5.08 billion in 2013-14. One reason behind this is the falling value of petroleum products which constitute 50 percent of total imports.
The country's exports to the kingdom are decreasing as well mainly due to a drop in proceeds of rice, fruits, vegetable preparations, apparel and clothing and made-up articles of textile material.
Rice is one of the major export items to Saudi Arabia but now the commodity's market is being captured by other countries, particularly India.
If an agreement is reached on the PTA, Saudi Arabia will become the second country after Iran with which Pakistan will have a bilateral preferential arrangement, the report said.
Other issues that will be discussed include easing of procedures for business visa which currently involves multiple departments and takes at least six weeks.
Saudi Arabia has also increased the business visa fee to Rs 74,000 per person for attending any business activity in the kingdom and Pakistan will be looking for a fee waiver.
Pakistan is likely to raise the issue of removing ban on its shrimp exports to Saudi Arabia as well as seeking licence for State Life Insurance to do business in the kingdom, besides holding single-country exhibitions to promote market access for its products.
Possible areas for investment with Saudi Arabia include the halal food sector, cattle farming, milk, fisheries and other agro industry projects.
For resolving the NTB, two important issues will be discussed; mutual recognition agreement to avoid delay in customs and clearance of Pakistan's export shipments at the kingdom's ports and quality assurance certificates to be recognised by Saudi Food and Drug Authority, the report said.
Firstpost is now on WhatsApp. For the latest analysis, commentary and news updates, sign up for our WhatsApp services. Just go to Firstpost.com/Whatsapp and hit the Subscribe button.
Updated Date: Feb 14, 2019 14:33:00 IST

Kothagudem Police nab rice pulling gang

THE HANS INDIA |    Feb 14,2019 , 01:16 AM IST Description: Kothgudem DSP SM Ali addressing a press conference on Wednesday
      
Kothgudem DSP SM Ali addressing a press conference on Wednesday
Kothagudem: The police have arrested a rice pulling gang here on Wednesday. Kothagudem Deputy Superintendent of Police SM Ali, addressing a press conference at Laxmidevipalli police station, said that they have seized a brass vessel, Rs 1.95 lakh cash and some rice from the accused.

He said the accused Bhim Raju and Krishna of Medar Basti in Kothagudem have made the rice pulling equipment using brass vessel. They covered with a layer of magnet to attract rice grains and inserted small iron pieces into the grains.

Their friends Srinu and Sunder have helped them to make it. The accused tried to dupe innocent victims claiming that it had mystical powers and was worth crores of rupees in the market.

With the help of a person called Vankudoth Venkat Ramulu of Tekulapalli mandal in the district, the gang has trapped a person from Vijayawada, Lanka Govindarajulu to sell the piece they made.

The police who learnt about this have taken the accused into custody, the DSP said. He appreciated CI Karunakar, SI Varun Prasad and constables Ravi and Kannaiah for nabbing the gang members.
https://www.thehansindia.com/posts/index/Telangana/2019-02-14/Kothagudem-Police-nab-rice-pulling-gang/494451